<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert Nagle: Geek conference notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2006/03/23/robert-nagle-geek-conference-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2006/03/23/robert-nagle-geek-conference-notes/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:34:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2006/03/23/robert-nagle-geek-conference-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-52628</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4527#comment-52628</guid>
		<description>“Now that I have a large number of portable devices, will the industry start to standardize the types of batteries and rechargers?”

And almost to the point, will they make then user-replaceable?

Companies don&#039;t really give a thought to what we&#039;ll do with the device we buy today three years down the line, because they really want us buying a new device in three years time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Now that I have a large number of portable devices, will the industry start to standardize the types of batteries and rechargers?”</p>
<p>And almost to the point, will they make then user-replaceable?</p>
<p>Companies don&#8217;t really give a thought to what we&#8217;ll do with the device we buy today three years down the line, because they really want us buying a new device in three years time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2006/03/23/robert-nagle-geek-conference-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-52621</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4527#comment-52621</guid>
		<description>robert said:
&gt;   (That’s one advantage to signing with a major publisher, apparently).

actually, it&#039;s more an advantage of doing a large press run.

and yes, you also have to be smart enough to know that
giving away those copies will &quot;prime the pump&quot; for sales.
but it&#039;s a lot easier to &quot;receive&quot; that enlightenment when
your per-book cost is twenty cents instead of two dollars.

dan poynter has been telling self-publishers for years that 
they absolutely must do a large press run out of the gate,
and go the p.o.d. route only _after_ that first run (if then),
so their unit-cost is low enough that they&#039;ll seed reviewers...

-bowerbird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>robert said:<br />
&gt;   (That’s one advantage to signing with a major publisher, apparently).</p>
<p>actually, it&#8217;s more an advantage of doing a large press run.</p>
<p>and yes, you also have to be smart enough to know that<br />
giving away those copies will &#8220;prime the pump&#8221; for sales.<br />
but it&#8217;s a lot easier to &#8220;receive&#8221; that enlightenment when<br />
your per-book cost is twenty cents instead of two dollars.</p>
<p>dan poynter has been telling self-publishers for years that<br />
they absolutely must do a large press run out of the gate,<br />
and go the p.o.d. route only _after_ that first run (if then),<br />
so their unit-cost is low enough that they&#8217;ll seed reviewers&#8230;</p>
<p>-bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
