<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free romance e-books&#8212;and a publishing insider&#8217;s candid thoughts on romance fiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Regina Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-195378</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6076#comment-195378</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

Yes, that would be David Hilzenrath, an investigative reporter for the Washington Post who has published his book with Lulu. I think it&#039;s great, and it definitely says something for Lulu and the quality of their offerings. And yes, I feel vidicated, (and I&#039;m glad you do too!) it&#039;s nice to see Lulu get kudos.

Regina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>Yes, that would be David Hilzenrath, an investigative reporter for the Washington Post who has published his book with Lulu. I think it&#8217;s great, and it definitely says something for Lulu and the quality of their offerings. And yes, I feel vidicated, (and I&#8217;m glad you do too!) it&#8217;s nice to see Lulu get kudos.</p>
<p>Regina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-195073</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6076#comment-195073</guid>
		<description>&quot;I also suggest to beginning writers who cannot afford the cost to become part of a critique group.&quot;

Another excellent suggestion, Regina.

&quot;It’s great if you can afford to hire a professional editor to edit your book, but they can be costly.&quot;

If I were devoting hundreds of hours to book for POD, I would aim for input from both a professional copy editor and friends. I&#039;m not swimming in cash, but given the time needed to write a good book, yes, I would probably invest in a professional if I wanted the book to be reviewed.

In the end this is a &quot;depends&quot; issue. If I were to throw together a collection of tweaked TeleBlog postings and not be terribly ambitious about the project, I&#039;d put less money into it. Even then, however, I&#039;d take proofing most seriously. 

To return to an earlier point, just to show that POD does not mean just self-publishing, I notice that none other than the Washington Post will use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lulu.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lulu&lt;/a&gt; for a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6078&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;book project&lt;/a&gt;. Given the nice words I&#039;ve written about Lulu, I feel a bit vindicated. You should, too, Regina, as a Lulu user.

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I also suggest to beginning writers who cannot afford the cost to become part of a critique group.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another excellent suggestion, Regina.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s great if you can afford to hire a professional editor to edit your book, but they can be costly.&#8221;</p>
<p>If I were devoting hundreds of hours to book for POD, I would aim for input from both a professional copy editor and friends. I&#8217;m not swimming in cash, but given the time needed to write a good book, yes, I would probably invest in a professional if I wanted the book to be reviewed.</p>
<p>In the end this is a &#8220;depends&#8221; issue. If I were to throw together a collection of tweaked TeleBlog postings and not be terribly ambitious about the project, I&#8217;d put less money into it. Even then, however, I&#8217;d take proofing most seriously. </p>
<p>To return to an earlier point, just to show that POD does not mean just self-publishing, I notice that none other than the Washington Post will use <a href="http://www.lulu.com" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">Lulu</a> for a <a href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6078" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">book project</a>. Given the nice words I&#8217;ve written about Lulu, I feel a bit vindicated. You should, too, Regina, as a Lulu user.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-194848</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 06:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6076#comment-194848</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

It&#039;s great if you can afford to hire a professional editor to edit your book, but they can be costly. I also suggest to beginning writers who cannot afford the cost to become part of a critique group. That way you can get several opinions at once, and there is usually one eagle-eyed individual who is good with grammar, punctuation and so on.

I hear you on the fact of a sharp eyed reader catching edits that need to be made. I actually tell people I want them to let me know if they see something in my books or on my website that needs to be fixed, those extra eagle eyes really help!

The Chicago Manual of Style is great, although I can never remember all the rules either. My personal favorite for the rules, because it is the quick and dirty version is Strunk and White&#039;s The Elements of Style.  It&#039;s less than a 100 pages and you can find what you need relatively quickly.

Regina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great if you can afford to hire a professional editor to edit your book, but they can be costly. I also suggest to beginning writers who cannot afford the cost to become part of a critique group. That way you can get several opinions at once, and there is usually one eagle-eyed individual who is good with grammar, punctuation and so on.</p>
<p>I hear you on the fact of a sharp eyed reader catching edits that need to be made. I actually tell people I want them to let me know if they see something in my books or on my website that needs to be fixed, those extra eagle eyes really help!</p>
<p>The Chicago Manual of Style is great, although I can never remember all the rules either. My personal favorite for the rules, because it is the quick and dirty version is Strunk and White&#8217;s The Elements of Style.  It&#8217;s less than a 100 pages and you can find what you need relatively quickly.</p>
<p>Regina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-194845</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6076#comment-194845</guid>
		<description>Great advice on proofing, Regina. The more times you read a manuscript, the better. In fact, the most serious POD folks would do well to hire professionals. 

I&#039;m hardly a stellar proofer myself, but at times the TeleBlog benefits from a very sharp-eyed volunteer, to whom I&#039;m immensely grateful. 

In a related vein, here&#039;s a reminder for people to acquaint themselves with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Chicago Manual of Style&lt;/a&gt;.  At least that&#039;s the most common manual in use here in the States.

Most writers will never be able to memorize all the rules there or follow all the advice---I sin constantly---but it&#039;s a start.

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great advice on proofing, Regina. The more times you read a manuscript, the better. In fact, the most serious POD folks would do well to hire professionals. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m hardly a stellar proofer myself, but at times the TeleBlog benefits from a very sharp-eyed volunteer, to whom I&#8217;m immensely grateful. </p>
<p>In a related vein, here&#8217;s a reminder for people to acquaint themselves with <a href="http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/home.html" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">The Chicago Manual of Style</a>.  At least that&#8217;s the most common manual in use here in the States.</p>
<p>Most writers will never be able to memorize all the rules there or follow all the advice&#8212;I sin constantly&#8212;but it&#8217;s a start.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-194798</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 05:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6076#comment-194798</guid>
		<description>Hey David,

Yup, I&#039;m hooked now, you&#039;re stuck with me.  I&#039;ll be checking back often to comment and to read other&#039;s comments.

As to taking the article in the right spirit, of course, that goes without saying. And you&#039;re correct POD and self-published aren&#039;t always the same, some traditional e-pubs do POD for their print books. This is just my preference for terminology. 

Having someone help you edit is absolutely crucial when self-publishing. I had a couple of other people read my book Getting Out Alive, and I read it an additional time after that before sending it in to the publisher. It&#039;s still possible to miss things, but you will have a much better chance than if you try and edit it totally by yourself, this is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey David,</p>
<p>Yup, I&#8217;m hooked now, you&#8217;re stuck with me.  I&#8217;ll be checking back often to comment and to read other&#8217;s comments.</p>
<p>As to taking the article in the right spirit, of course, that goes without saying. And you&#8217;re correct POD and self-published aren&#8217;t always the same, some traditional e-pubs do POD for their print books. This is just my preference for terminology. </p>
<p>Having someone help you edit is absolutely crucial when self-publishing. I had a couple of other people read my book Getting Out Alive, and I read it an additional time after that before sending it in to the publisher. It&#8217;s still possible to miss things, but you will have a much better chance than if you try and edit it totally by yourself, this is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-193240</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6076#comment-193240</guid>
		<description>Nice hearing from you, Regina, and thanks for taking the item in the right spirit---and pointing romance fans to the link to Part II of the series. I hope you&#039;ll stick around the TeleBlog and tell others about it.

As for POD vs. self-published, one isn&#039;t always the same as another; so I&#039;ll stick with &quot;self published&quot; in many cases. As usual, I would encourage people to judge by the book rather than condemn all SP works or praise everything from big publishers.

What really counts, no matter what the category, is a good editor. Few people can write a book without others doing the copy editing at the very least.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice hearing from you, Regina, and thanks for taking the item in the right spirit&#8212;and pointing romance fans to the link to Part II of the series. I hope you&#8217;ll stick around the TeleBlog and tell others about it.</p>
<p>As for POD vs. self-published, one isn&#8217;t always the same as another; so I&#8217;ll stick with &#8220;self published&#8221; in many cases. As usual, I would encourage people to judge by the book rather than condemn all SP works or praise everything from big publishers.</p>
<p>What really counts, no matter what the category, is a good editor. Few people can write a book without others doing the copy editing at the very least.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regina Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-192859</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6076#comment-192859</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed reading your comments on the article I wrote Part 1: Where to Find 64 Romance E-books to Download. I was happy to see that I generated some discussion both about self-publishing, and romance books in general. While I hadn&#039;t thought of this happening when I originally wrote the article, I think it&#039;s a great side benefit. It&#039;s true some on the list are self-published, including myself, although I personally prefer the term POD published (Print On Demand for those who aren&#039;t familiar with the term). Not because I think there is anything wrong with self-publishing, but because the word itself conjures up notions of bad writing, and the idea that if someone self-publishes they are not &quot;good enough.&quot; While it is true there are some really awful self-published books out there, I&#039;ve also read some very good ones. I review, and edit for Coffee Time Romance in addition to being an author, and honestly I&#039;ve seen both self-published books and books from NY Times Bestselling authors with the same types of errors, like typos and horrible grammar. I even had one where whoever edited the book didn&#039;t catch that the main character&#039;s name had been changed in several places! Talk about confusing. 

Thanks again for commenting, and the second part is on my content producer page should anyone be interested. Where to Find Free Online Romance Reads Part II. You can find it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/117959/where_to_find_free_online_romance_reads.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading your comments on the article I wrote Part 1: Where to Find 64 Romance E-books to Download. I was happy to see that I generated some discussion both about self-publishing, and romance books in general. While I hadn&#8217;t thought of this happening when I originally wrote the article, I think it&#8217;s a great side benefit. It&#8217;s true some on the list are self-published, including myself, although I personally prefer the term POD published (Print On Demand for those who aren&#8217;t familiar with the term). Not because I think there is anything wrong with self-publishing, but because the word itself conjures up notions of bad writing, and the idea that if someone self-publishes they are not &#8220;good enough.&#8221; While it is true there are some really awful self-published books out there, I&#8217;ve also read some very good ones. I review, and edit for Coffee Time Romance in addition to being an author, and honestly I&#8217;ve seen both self-published books and books from NY Times Bestselling authors with the same types of errors, like typos and horrible grammar. I even had one where whoever edited the book didn&#8217;t catch that the main character&#8217;s name had been changed in several places! Talk about confusing. </p>
<p>Thanks again for commenting, and the second part is on my content producer page should anyone be interested. Where to Find Free Online Romance Reads Part II. You can find it <a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/117959/where_to_find_free_online_romance_reads.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-192617</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6076#comment-192617</guid>
		<description>Thanks for those recs,  Jane, and I hope you&#039;ll use this thread to point readers to other helpful details, whether at your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dearauthor.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DearAuthor.com&lt;/a&gt; or elsewhere. It&#039;s great to hear that, yes, the list does contain some good reads.  - David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for those recs,  Jane, and I hope you&#8217;ll use this thread to point readers to other helpful details, whether at your <a href="http://www.dearauthor.com" rel="nofollow">DearAuthor.com</a> or elsewhere. It&#8217;s great to hear that, yes, the list does contain some good reads.  &#8211; David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/01/18/free-romance-e-books-and-a-publishing-insiders-candid-thoughts-on-romance-fiction/comment-page-1/#comment-192510</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6076#comment-192510</guid>
		<description>Sasha White is a NY Published author.  Charlene Teglia wrote one of the best erotic romances called &quot;Yule Be Mine.&quot;  Raine Weaver is also very good.  I&#039;ve heard of about three others on the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sasha White is a NY Published author.  Charlene Teglia wrote one of the best erotic romances called &#8220;Yule Be Mine.&#8221;  Raine Weaver is also very good.  I&#8217;ve heard of about three others on the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
