Myths and Facts about School Textbook Prices
By Robert Nagle

Myth: When a company wants to undermine consumer-based research about the high price of textbooks, the most effective way to do so is to portray the findings as a bunch of myths.
Fact: The research they are trying to debunk comes from surveys of readers and consumers. Although the data may have methodological shortcomings, they nonetheless represent the voice of the people who feel the brunt of textbook prices.
Admittedly, it looks like the Make Textbooks Affordable coalition had a point they intended to prove. That said, some of the results are staggering to ponder if true:
- Price Awareness:
For professors who meet with sales representatives to research textbooks: 77% told us that sales representatives rarely or never volunteer the price. And even when professors directly asked for the price during a sales meeting, only 38% reported that the sales representative would always disclose the price.
- On bundled course material:
Only 50% of the professors who told us that they assigned a bundled book last semester said that they used the additional materials often. One-third said that they either could not assign the book they chose without the bundle or did not know if that option was available. This finding stands in contrast to the claims of many in the publishing industry that most of their books are available unbundled.
- Unnecessary New Editions: Over 700 physics and math professors have written to Thompson Learning asking them to stop issuing new editions of textbooks.. From the Make Textbooks Affordable summary sheet:
Of the professors we surveyed, 71% said that new editions of textbooks in their field are justified only ‘sometimes’ or ‘rarely’, confirming earlier PIRG research. Since new editions are on average 12% more expensive than the previous edition, students are spending a lot of money for little educational gain.
In the response from the publishing houses, a rather amazing figure is thrown out:
Developing a new textbook and accompanying learning tools can cost more than $1 million. The largest portion of this cost is the time and work of authors, experts, editors, researchers, reviewers and designers. Other factors also contribute to the final retail price of textbooks, including:
- inflation, which is running at an annual rate of 4.8 percent for 2006 (according to the U.S. Department of Laborís Bureau of Labor Statistics), accounts for more than 77 percent of the increase in textbook prices
- book store mark-ups, which are determined by the bookstore and affected by a number of factors, such as staff and operations costs, which vary from store to store;
- paper, which is driven by the cost of raw materials;
- layout, typesetting and printing, which are driven by labor costs;
- freight and transportation, which are driven by fuel costs;
- federal, state and local taxes
There is an unnamed comment on a higher education blog by a textbook editor that rings true to me. (NO Permalink; see “Book Editor” May 25 comment). Lots of insights:
- Amazon vs. BN.com
The price listed on Amazon.com for a new copy of any college textbook is almost NEVER correct. Amazon is geared almost entirely to *trade* book sales, and almost always screws up the markup on ’short discount’ books (i.e., textbooks and university-press monographs). If you’re attempting to find a more accurate *new* book price for a text you’re considering, go to bn.com. Because they run some of the nation’s college bookstores, they generally know what a ‘net’ price is, and mark up textbooks at a rate within the range listed above.
- Kickbacks for Profs
It is a well-known yet little-discussed fact in college publishing that “committee decisions”—in which a select number of faculty members in a large department convene to choose a text for all sections of a course—frequently end in the faculty committees demanding considerable incentives, kickbacks, freebies, and commitments to underwrite specific campus events. This wheeling and dealing has become standard practice among faculty who supervise text selection for large survey courses, and very few of them show any compunction about it.
(The most egregious, and ridiculous, example I have heard of is a quid-pro-quo acquisition by a publisher of a golf-cart for an English department at a state university in the southwest in exchange for a very large textbook adoption.)
- Selling vs. Reselling
Each copy of a text is sold by the publisher exactly once. A well-managed college bookstore will sell that same copy at least 3 or 4 additional times as a used book, at a much higher profit margin (for the bookstore) than the new book.
- Ebooks vs. Print Runs
As the sales curve for new copies of a book asymptotically approaches zero, the per-book cost to the publisher to print and bind the new copies rises considerably. Small print runs=high unit costs=very low profit.
—Every major college publisher offers low-cost options in most subject areas, and ebook versions are widely available across the curriculum.
—Despite the availability of these options, and the aggressive publicity campaigns to promote them, very few professors choose to assign an ebook, almost no students buy them, and most low-cost print editions significantly undersell their full-featured, full-price cousins.




























May 31st, 2007 at 7:28 pm
I don’t understand how the “fact” is supposed to contradict the “myth”?
June 1st, 2007 at 2:28 pm
The textbook business is more like a racket than a business. The changing of a few words and page numbers, to make a “new edition” is a farce. Very little or no new content is added. This is done to kill the sale of used textbooks and force the student to buy a new book at an unjustifiably high price. In most academic subjects, there really isn’t a need to have a new edition every year.
I am currently taking three classes (Summer session) and I purchased the required textbooks online for about $200 (with shipping). If I had purchased these same textbooks at the university bookstore, the price would have been double. I’m sure the online sellers are making a good profit, so the university pricing is pure price gouging of a captive market.
Some years ago, I took a course where the required textbook was written by the instructor. Not only was the textbook pure crap, but it was outragiously priced. And it was a medium-sized paperback.
If textbooks had to compete for sales like other books, none of this would be happening. However, the collusion between the publishers, the universities and the professors, keep this extortion racket going.
The only recourse that the student has is to see if he can find the textbooks online. Even there, he usually has to buy the expensive “new edition”, rather than a perfectly good used book.
Our governments investigate businesses like Microsoft, phone companies and satellite radio companies over concerns about monopolistic practices, price fixing and dirty deals. What about taking a look at the textbook industry?
June 1st, 2007 at 2:39 pm
One more comment about textbooks, this time from the ebook angle.
For the courses that I am currently taking, I specifically tried to find ebook editions for all six of them. I only found one and it was a novel. One of the textbooks was supposedly available as an ebook, as I found an ISBN for it. However, I could not find anywhere to buy it. I even emailed the publisher, but never got a response.
The reason I wanted ebook editions is that I have a tablet PC and find it much easier to annotate and highlight an ebook on the tablet. It is also easier to copy text passages to use for study notes. Besides, I hate marking up a p-book.
Perhaps that is one reason why I couldn’t find ebook editions. If I have to markup a p-book, I can’t sell it as a used book. This means fewer used books on the market and more sales of “new” books.
June 2nd, 2007 at 3:07 am
Annotations are really important! I find it hard to understand why devices like Sony Reader have really limited support for that. I personally don’t like reading on a laptop, but it would be nice to have the ability to make annotations on the actual text.
February 22nd, 2008 at 1:06 pm
The U.S. Department of Laborís Bureau of Labor Statistics cited in this article doesn’t exist.
They didn’t give a citation and it seems they were trying to invoke use of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics
April 13th, 2008 at 3:21 pm
Whoever is in charge of this, can you give me more information. I’m doing research on this topic, and I’m getting it, but some stuff still seems unclear. Can you tell me what can a student do in a private university to help reduce the cost of textbooks locally in their university, like the steps? And what are your arguments and your counter arguments concerning this using facts? Please respond, since I’m very anxious about this topic and finding new ways to reduce costs, something practical that we can do to lower prices in our school. Please email me at juanitojr13@hotmail.com.
June 22nd, 2008 at 8:48 pm
[...] have realized that this unorganized sector is eating up their profits. Publishers have found ways to counter this issue. They release new editions of the textbook with a little change and [...]