<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Kindle as a pirate gizmo&#8212;plus Vanity Fair says, &#8216;Gadget makers want you to steal&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:42:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-646059</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-646059</guid>
		<description>Joanna wrote: &quot;Where I think the ‘industry’ gets into trouble is this whole obsession they have with ‘monetizing’ every byte of data in the world, like that guy posted today who thought people would pay $10 to read his blog. That kind of attitude makes people resentful and does not encourage repeat buying&quot;

Exactly.

You know an hidden assumption in the music/book/movie complaints about piracy is that they assume piracy is free. But finding, downloading, transferring, and then using pirated materials has very real actual and opportunity costs. The only reason large numbers of people pirate music and movies is that the costs imposed by the producers are often significantly higher than the opportunity and actual costs of downloading from a filesharing network.

For example, say I want album X in MP3 format. Finding album X in the format I want at the bit rate I want is nontrivial. Downloading it and organizing it (since so much music offered on filesharing networks has non-existent metadata) is an additional cost.

If I could download the album for $5, the costs of downloading would be significantly higher than going out and stealing it. But once the album costs me $20,  the situation is reversed.

That&#039;s the real secret behind Baen&#039;s success IMO. The low cost plus lack of DRM means, frankly, it is cheaper for me to buy it from Baen than look for those books on some filesharing network. Moreover I have that positive experience I have with Baen makes me feel less like some point on a spreadsheet at some megacorp and more like buying a book at a traditional bookstore or con, which I almost never feel buying ebooks anywhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joanna wrote: &#8220;Where I think the ‘industry’ gets into trouble is this whole obsession they have with ‘monetizing’ every byte of data in the world, like that guy posted today who thought people would pay $10 to read his blog. That kind of attitude makes people resentful and does not encourage repeat buying&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly.</p>
<p>You know an hidden assumption in the music/book/movie complaints about piracy is that they assume piracy is free. But finding, downloading, transferring, and then using pirated materials has very real actual and opportunity costs. The only reason large numbers of people pirate music and movies is that the costs imposed by the producers are often significantly higher than the opportunity and actual costs of downloading from a filesharing network.</p>
<p>For example, say I want album X in MP3 format. Finding album X in the format I want at the bit rate I want is nontrivial. Downloading it and organizing it (since so much music offered on filesharing networks has non-existent metadata) is an additional cost.</p>
<p>If I could download the album for $5, the costs of downloading would be significantly higher than going out and stealing it. But once the album costs me $20,  the situation is reversed.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the real secret behind Baen&#8217;s success IMO. The low cost plus lack of DRM means, frankly, it is cheaper for me to buy it from Baen than look for those books on some filesharing network. Moreover I have that positive experience I have with Baen makes me feel less like some point on a spreadsheet at some megacorp and more like buying a book at a traditional bookstore or con, which I almost never feel buying ebooks anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanna</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-646019</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-646019</guid>
		<description>I think the indie crowd, both in music (Jane Sibbery and her &#039;pay what you think it is worth&#039; system, where less than 20% paid nothing and of the 80+% who paid, more than half chose to pay more than the suggested price) and books (Jim Munroe, Cory Doctorow et al) have proven that people WILL pay a reasonable price for content they appreciate. Where I think the &#039;industry&#039; gets into trouble is this whole obsession they have with &#039;monetizing&#039; every byte of data in the world, like that guy posted today who thought people would pay $10 to read his blog. That kind of attitude makes people resentful and does not encourage repeat buying. If I paid for it once, I should own it. I may pay extra for a print copy of an e-book I enjoyed, but I certainly will not pay a second time for a Kindle version if I already have a Rocketbook version or some nonsense like that. And if you tell me I have to? Yeah, I may look for techie ways around that :) 

Bottom-line dollar is not the deal-breaker for most people. I think the issue is &#039;how easy and pleasant are you making it for me to get what I want at a price that is reasonable to both of us?&#039; My Mac is the single most expensive item I own, but I would do it again in a minute even though there are cheaper options, because I liked the user experience. I also bought my Doctorow print books in part because I respected what the author was doing in the e-world and wanted to show my support. If the author in question was a total jerk who made me pay 5 cents every time I visited his website, I certainly wouldn&#039;t be supporting such a business model. Better for the author to gain a fan base, even if that means judicious use of a freebie or two, and make people feel like part of a community they want to participate in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the indie crowd, both in music (Jane Sibbery and her &#8216;pay what you think it is worth&#8217; system, where less than 20% paid nothing and of the 80+% who paid, more than half chose to pay more than the suggested price) and books (Jim Munroe, Cory Doctorow et al) have proven that people WILL pay a reasonable price for content they appreciate. Where I think the &#8216;industry&#8217; gets into trouble is this whole obsession they have with &#8216;monetizing&#8217; every byte of data in the world, like that guy posted today who thought people would pay $10 to read his blog. That kind of attitude makes people resentful and does not encourage repeat buying. If I paid for it once, I should own it. I may pay extra for a print copy of an e-book I enjoyed, but I certainly will not pay a second time for a Kindle version if I already have a Rocketbook version or some nonsense like that. And if you tell me I have to? Yeah, I may look for techie ways around that <img src='http://www.teleread.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Bottom-line dollar is not the deal-breaker for most people. I think the issue is &#8216;how easy and pleasant are you making it for me to get what I want at a price that is reasonable to both of us?&#8217; My Mac is the single most expensive item I own, but I would do it again in a minute even though there are cheaper options, because I liked the user experience. I also bought my Doctorow print books in part because I respected what the author was doing in the e-world and wanted to show my support. If the author in question was a total jerk who made me pay 5 cents every time I visited his website, I certainly wouldn&#8217;t be supporting such a business model. Better for the author to gain a fan base, even if that means judicious use of a freebie or two, and make people feel like part of a community they want to participate in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-646018</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-646018</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;Yeah, god forbid a device let me take a public domain book like the Bible and read it on an ebook reader without giving some publisher somewhere a cut.

That would be the royalty called a tithe.  (Satan get behind me!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Yeah, god forbid a device let me take a public domain book like the Bible and read it on an ebook reader without giving some publisher somewhere a cut.</p>
<p>That would be the royalty called a tithe.  (Satan get behind me!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-645970</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-645970</guid>
		<description>Yeah, god forbid a device let me take a public domain book like the Bible and read it on an ebook reader without giving some publisher somewhere a cut.

The thing about pirated ebook is they&#039;re not as reliable as other forms of pirated media. Many are, in fact, simply OCRed scans that have varying degrees of accuracy (I&#039;m just speaking hypothetically of course! I assume that this is the case.)

Books-for-a-buck is a great idea...hell, Baen&#039;s pricing model is excellent. For everyone else, the cost of finding the book in an acceptable format and then paying for it is typically higher than just finding someone who is filesharing the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, god forbid a device let me take a public domain book like the Bible and read it on an ebook reader without giving some publisher somewhere a cut.</p>
<p>The thing about pirated ebook is they&#8217;re not as reliable as other forms of pirated media. Many are, in fact, simply OCRed scans that have varying degrees of accuracy (I&#8217;m just speaking hypothetically of course! I assume that this is the case.)</p>
<p>Books-for-a-buck is a great idea&#8230;hell, Baen&#8217;s pricing model is excellent. For everyone else, the cost of finding the book in an acceptable format and then paying for it is typically higher than just finding someone who is filesharing the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-645927</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-645927</guid>
		<description>Wolff is a very strange guy to pontificate about ethics.  You must read his book about how he sold the &quot;Internet&quot; and made his fortune, Burn Rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolff is a very strange guy to pontificate about ethics.  You must read his book about how he sold the &#8220;Internet&#8221; and made his fortune, Burn Rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-645338</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-645338</guid>
		<description>Lawrence Lessig has a good discussion of the different kinds of filesharing / filecopying in his book _Free Culture_. He talks about 4 kinds, Ive used his kinds but added my comments:

A - &#039;substitutes for purchasing&#039; - classic piracy; addressable through existing law (e.g. allofmp3) for commercial piracy, addressable though DMCA take downs for YouTube style collaborative sharing. These steps break fragment piracy and should greatly stunt it. This should leave something like the &#039;lend the book you liked to your father&#039; sharing, technically here you are left with a copy and thus violate copyright law - but the economic effect is probably similar to lending it.

B - &#039;sample before buying&#039; - maybe this is even a benefit, from studies it seems the jury is still out here.

C - &#039;hard to find / out of print&#039; - as paper is taken out of the equation this should naturally disappear, converting to A or B.

D - &#039;free (libre) content&#039; - applying DRM to public domain works - is that a kind of piracy? locking people out of their own property?

We should in general be careful about letting computer code manage law - how often does tech go wrong? In the US Fair Use is some complex 3 (or 4) aspect &#039;test&#039;, there is no way code can do that so DRM says &#039;no fair use&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawrence Lessig has a good discussion of the different kinds of filesharing / filecopying in his book _Free Culture_. He talks about 4 kinds, Ive used his kinds but added my comments:</p>
<p>A &#8211; &#8217;substitutes for purchasing&#8217; &#8211; classic piracy; addressable through existing law (e.g. allofmp3) for commercial piracy, addressable though DMCA take downs for YouTube style collaborative sharing. These steps break fragment piracy and should greatly stunt it. This should leave something like the &#8216;lend the book you liked to your father&#8217; sharing, technically here you are left with a copy and thus violate copyright law &#8211; but the economic effect is probably similar to lending it.</p>
<p>B &#8211; &#8217;sample before buying&#8217; &#8211; maybe this is even a benefit, from studies it seems the jury is still out here.</p>
<p>C &#8211; &#8216;hard to find / out of print&#8217; &#8211; as paper is taken out of the equation this should naturally disappear, converting to A or B.</p>
<p>D &#8211; &#8216;free (libre) content&#8217; &#8211; applying DRM to public domain works &#8211; is that a kind of piracy? locking people out of their own property?</p>
<p>We should in general be careful about letting computer code manage law &#8211; how often does tech go wrong? In the US Fair Use is some complex 3 (or 4) aspect &#8216;test&#8217;, there is no way code can do that so DRM says &#8216;no fair use&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadrien GARDEUR</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-645180</link>
		<dc:creator>Hadrien GARDEUR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-645180</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve added a few comments on Techcrunch...

One of the comment is actually quite interesting:
&quot;What idiot thinks Kindle doesn’t support ebook standards?

Mobipocket and Kindle support OPS 1.0, the official ebook standard since 2000. It will also support OPS 2.0, the official ebook standard since 2007. OPS 1.0 is a standard for files to be converted into ebooks using Dublin Metacore data, an XML schema, and so forth.

It also supports conversion from Word, RTF, Simple HTML, and PDF (beta) but you’re saying Amazon should sell devices that it’s not easy to convert things into?

That worked so well for Sony…&quot;

I answered to this person (it&#039;s signed &quot;Some guy&quot;) that the Kindle cannot be considered like a device that support current e-book standards. But don&#039;t you think that this comment sound like someone from Amazon (or Lab126) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve added a few comments on Techcrunch&#8230;</p>
<p>One of the comment is actually quite interesting:<br />
&#8220;What idiot thinks Kindle doesn’t support ebook standards?</p>
<p>Mobipocket and Kindle support OPS 1.0, the official ebook standard since 2000. It will also support OPS 2.0, the official ebook standard since 2007. OPS 1.0 is a standard for files to be converted into ebooks using Dublin Metacore data, an XML schema, and so forth.</p>
<p>It also supports conversion from Word, RTF, Simple HTML, and PDF (beta) but you’re saying Amazon should sell devices that it’s not easy to convert things into?</p>
<p>That worked so well for Sony…&#8221;</p>
<p>I answered to this person (it&#8217;s signed &#8220;Some guy&#8221;) that the Kindle cannot be considered like a device that support current e-book standards. But don&#8217;t you think that this comment sound like someone from Amazon (or Lab126) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-645167</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-645167</guid>
		<description>Rob, thanks for your thoughts. Pirates are like cockroaches--they&#039;ll  steal from anything: printed books (via OCR), non-DRMed for sale books (obvious) and ad-supported books (as you&#039;ve described). But without DRM, &lt;em&gt;legal&lt;/em&gt; books are easier to use. The best DRM-proofing is low prices, and I really like your biz model. We need all kinds of models available, and advertising happens to be one. Really enjoyed the newspaper example, Rob; thanks! Just perfect. Happy holidays! - David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, thanks for your thoughts. Pirates are like cockroaches&#8211;they&#8217;ll  steal from anything: printed books (via OCR), non-DRMed for sale books (obvious) and ad-supported books (as you&#8217;ve described). But without DRM, <em>legal</em> books are easier to use. The best DRM-proofing is low prices, and I really like your biz model. We need all kinds of models available, and advertising happens to be one. Really enjoyed the newspaper example, Rob; thanks! Just perfect. Happy holidays! &#8211; David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BooksForABuck</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-645155</link>
		<dc:creator>BooksForABuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-645155</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s certainly possible that a lot of good things will happen when the price of music (and books) falls to zero. There are also some bad things that will happen. For example, David, your ad-supported model depends on users not stripping out the ads and &#039;pirating&#039; ad-stripped content. Of course, my already-underpaid authors (and underpaid editors and artists) won&#039;t consider a zero price that much of a good thing.

I established my business on the theory that books should be sold at an affordable price and that eBook technology offers significant savings that can be passed to readers. But affordable shouldn&#039;t have to mean completely free.

As you know, and as Apple is trying to show, lack of DRM doesn&#039;t have to mean free content. DRM is designed as a mechanism to enforce, through technology, copyright law (at least that&#039;s its ideal form). I&#039;ve used the newspaper analogy before but I&#039;ll trot it out again. In the old days, before technology, newspapers used to sell in open machines. You&#039;d put in your dime and take a paper. Some were stolen but most people paid for what they took. I like to think we can move there with eBooks, too.

Rob Preece
Publisher, www.BooksForABuck.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s certainly possible that a lot of good things will happen when the price of music (and books) falls to zero. There are also some bad things that will happen. For example, David, your ad-supported model depends on users not stripping out the ads and &#8216;pirating&#8217; ad-stripped content. Of course, my already-underpaid authors (and underpaid editors and artists) won&#8217;t consider a zero price that much of a good thing.</p>
<p>I established my business on the theory that books should be sold at an affordable price and that eBook technology offers significant savings that can be passed to readers. But affordable shouldn&#8217;t have to mean completely free.</p>
<p>As you know, and as Apple is trying to show, lack of DRM doesn&#8217;t have to mean free content. DRM is designed as a mechanism to enforce, through technology, copyright law (at least that&#8217;s its ideal form). I&#8217;ve used the newspaper analogy before but I&#8217;ll trot it out again. In the old days, before technology, newspapers used to sell in open machines. You&#8217;d put in your dime and take a paper. Some were stolen but most people paid for what they took. I like to think we can move there with eBooks, too.</p>
<p>Rob Preece<br />
Publisher, <a href="http://www.BooksForABuck.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.BooksForABuck.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-645058</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-645058</guid>
		<description>Helpful link, Garson, thanks. Glad to see confirmation that Arrington is pointing out the futility of DRM, as I hoped he was doing. Of course, as his commenters unwittingly show, he could have been clearer. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helpful link, Garson, thanks. Glad to see confirmation that Arrington is pointing out the futility of DRM, as I hoped he was doing. Of course, as his commenters unwittingly show, he could have been clearer. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garson O'Toole</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-645042</link>
		<dc:creator>Garson O'Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/03/the-kindle-as-a-pirate-gizmo-plus-vanity-fair-says-gadget-makers-want-you-to-steal/#comment-645042</guid>
		<description>David Rothman questions the rationale for an article posted by the commentator Michael Arrington of TechCrunch, “Seriously, guys, what’s the point of running both the item and the pirate graphic”? To understand the radical attitude of the influential Arrington I suggest reading the article &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/the-inevitable-march-of-recorded-music-towards-free/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Inevitable March of Recorded Music Towards Free&lt;/A&gt; that Arrington posted on his blog earlier. Below are some excerpts: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;The economics of recorded music are fairly simple. Marginal production costs are zero: Like software, it doesn’t cost anything to produce another digital copy that is just as good as the original as soon as the first copy exists, and anyone can create those copies (meaning there is perfect competition and zero barriers to entry). Unless effective legal (copyright), technical (DRM) or other artificial impediments to production can be created, simple economic theory dictates that the price of music, like its marginal cost, must also fall to zero as more “competitors” (in this case, listeners who copy) enter the market. …

Eventually, unless governments are willing to take drastic measures to protect the industry (such as a mandatory music tax), economic theory will win out and the price of music will fall towards zero. …

When the industry finally capitulates and realizes that they can no longer charge a meaningful amount of money for digital recorded music, a lot of good things can happen.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Although Arrington’s comments are about the music industry, I think that he would perform a similar analysis and make similar claims about the market for e-books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Rothman questions the rationale for an article posted by the commentator Michael Arrington of TechCrunch, “Seriously, guys, what’s the point of running both the item and the pirate graphic”? To understand the radical attitude of the influential Arrington I suggest reading the article <a HREF="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/the-inevitable-march-of-recorded-music-towards-free/" rel="nofollow">The Inevitable March of Recorded Music Towards Free</a> that Arrington posted on his blog earlier. Below are some excerpts: </p>
<blockquote><p>The economics of recorded music are fairly simple. Marginal production costs are zero: Like software, it doesn’t cost anything to produce another digital copy that is just as good as the original as soon as the first copy exists, and anyone can create those copies (meaning there is perfect competition and zero barriers to entry). Unless effective legal (copyright), technical (DRM) or other artificial impediments to production can be created, simple economic theory dictates that the price of music, like its marginal cost, must also fall to zero as more “competitors” (in this case, listeners who copy) enter the market. …</p>
<p>Eventually, unless governments are willing to take drastic measures to protect the industry (such as a mandatory music tax), economic theory will win out and the price of music will fall towards zero. …</p>
<p>When the industry finally capitulates and realizes that they can no longer charge a meaningful amount of money for digital recorded music, a lot of good things can happen.</p></blockquote>
<p> Although Arrington’s comments are about the music industry, I think that he would perform a similar analysis and make similar claims about the market for e-books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
