<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would you pay $250 for book annotations? Why the IDPF needs a standard for shared annotations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/19/would-you-pay-250-for-book-annotations-why-the-idpf-needs-a-standard-for-shared-annotations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/19/would-you-pay-250-for-book-annotations-why-the-idpf-needs-a-standard-for-shared-annotations/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:40:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garson O'Toole</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/19/would-you-pay-250-for-book-annotations-why-the-idpf-needs-a-standard-for-shared-annotations/comment-page-1/#comment-1086687</link>
		<dc:creator>Garson O'Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/19/would-you-pay-250-for-book-annotations-why-the-idpf-needs-a-standard-for-shared-annotations/#comment-1086687</guid>
		<description>Many thanks to Larry for providing the good news that an updated version of &quot;Lexicon Urthus&quot; is available.

Since I wrote the article above the billionaire author &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/nyregion/09potter.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;J. K. Rowling successfully sued&lt;/A&gt; the publisher who attempted to print the “Harry Potter Lexicon”. In a high-profile case with ramifications for all the creators of unauthorized guidebooks the judge asserted:&lt;blockquote&gt;Plaintiffs have shown that the lexicon copies a sufficient quantity of the Harry Potter series to support a finding of substantial similarity between the Lexicon and Rowling’s novels.&lt;/blockquote&gt;E-books with annotations would definitely help to solve this type of conflict. Electronic pointers can highlight specific sections within Rowling’s works without endangering her copyrights. A proper standard for annotations and commentary would enable digital overlays that are ideal for guidebooks.

The lexicon was later modified, shortened, and expurgated &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/05/author-says-harry-potter-lexicon-will-be-published/?pagemode=print&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;to conform to the judge’s edicts&lt;/A&gt; and published as “The Lexicon: An Unauthorized Guide to Harry Potter Fiction and Related Materials”.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks to Larry for providing the good news that an updated version of &#8220;Lexicon Urthus&#8221; is available.</p>
<p>Since I wrote the article above the billionaire author <a HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/09/nyregion/09potter.html" rel="nofollow">J. K. Rowling successfully sued</a> the publisher who attempted to print the “Harry Potter Lexicon”. In a high-profile case with ramifications for all the creators of unauthorized guidebooks the judge asserted:<br />
<blockquote>Plaintiffs have shown that the lexicon copies a sufficient quantity of the Harry Potter series to support a finding of substantial similarity between the Lexicon and Rowling’s novels.</p></blockquote>
<p>E-books with annotations would definitely help to solve this type of conflict. Electronic pointers can highlight specific sections within Rowling’s works without endangering her copyrights. A proper standard for annotations and commentary would enable digital overlays that are ideal for guidebooks.</p>
<p>The lexicon was later modified, shortened, and expurgated <a HREF="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/05/author-says-harry-potter-lexicon-will-be-published/?pagemode=print" rel="nofollow">to conform to the judge’s edicts</a> and published as “The Lexicon: An Unauthorized Guide to Harry Potter Fiction and Related Materials”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/19/would-you-pay-250-for-book-annotations-why-the-idpf-needs-a-standard-for-shared-annotations/comment-page-1/#comment-1084880</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/19/would-you-pay-250-for-book-annotations-why-the-idpf-needs-a-standard-for-shared-annotations/#comment-1084880</guid>
		<description>The second edition of this book is available on Amazon in paperback (less than $14) and for the kindle (9.99).  A hardcover of the second edition can also be ordered online for $25.00.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second edition of this book is available on Amazon in paperback (less than $14) and for the kindle (9.99).  A hardcover of the second edition can also be ordered online for $25.00.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl&#8217;s Mewsings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Annotated eBooks?</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/19/would-you-pay-250-for-book-annotations-why-the-idpf-needs-a-standard-for-shared-annotations/comment-page-1/#comment-666398</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl&#8217;s Mewsings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Annotated eBooks?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/19/would-you-pay-250-for-book-annotations-why-the-idpf-needs-a-standard-for-shared-annotations/#comment-666398</guid>
		<description>[...] regular Google Alert for major SF awards has turned up an interesting post on a blog dedicated to eBooks. The post starts by noting that Michael Andre-Driussi&#8217;s Lexicon Urthus is currently going for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] regular Google Alert for major SF awards has turned up an interesting post on a blog dedicated to eBooks. The post starts by noting that Michael Andre-Driussi&#8217;s Lexicon Urthus is currently going for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary M</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2007/12/19/would-you-pay-250-for-book-annotations-why-the-idpf-needs-a-standard-for-shared-annotations/comment-page-1/#comment-664924</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/12/19/would-you-pay-250-for-book-annotations-why-the-idpf-needs-a-standard-for-shared-annotations/#comment-664924</guid>
		<description>I discovered the hard way that annotations on Kindle books are very skittish.  If you move a book from Kindle memory to an SD card or anywhere else, you look bookmarks, highlights, and annotations. They may remain in a clippings text file, but they&#039;re permanently divested from the book. I confirmed that sad fact with Kindle customer service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discovered the hard way that annotations on Kindle books are very skittish.  If you move a book from Kindle memory to an SD card or anywhere else, you look bookmarks, highlights, and annotations. They may remain in a clippings text file, but they&#8217;re permanently divested from the book. I confirmed that sad fact with Kindle customer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
