<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Kindle as censorship fodder: E more vulnerable to Big Bro than P?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:01:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/comment-page-1/#comment-1109003</link>
		<dc:creator>John Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-1109003</guid>
		<description>So, this morning (July 22, 2009)on MSNBC a reporter indicated that Kindle had pulled Orwell&#039;s Animal Farm.  Amazon went on to state that they had the right since a user did not purchase the book, but rather purchased the right to read it.  Even with a refund this sounds mighty &quot;Orwellian&quot;.  It is downright scary if true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, this morning (July 22, 2009)on MSNBC a reporter indicated that Kindle had pulled Orwell&#8217;s Animal Farm.  Amazon went on to state that they had the right since a user did not purchase the book, but rather purchased the right to read it.  Even with a refund this sounds mighty &#8220;Orwellian&#8221;.  It is downright scary if true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpiderMatt</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/comment-page-1/#comment-692683</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderMatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-692683</guid>
		<description>The Kindle has spyware?  Where did you read this?  Now I&#039;m curious as to how that works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kindle has spyware?  Where did you read this?  Now I&#8217;m curious as to how that works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/comment-page-1/#comment-691046</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-691046</guid>
		<description>Probably not very likely, but yet another reason to abolish the FCC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably not very likely, but yet another reason to abolish the FCC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/comment-page-1/#comment-691030</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-691030</guid>
		<description>Alas, Robert, D.C. might not just stop at wireless. Quite objectively, America is becoming more KGBish, as shown by increased surveillance going far beyond the understandable need to fight terrorism. Let&#039;s hope the country will change directions soon. As important as I believe is the issue of copyright, the First Amendment as a whole counts even more. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, Robert, D.C. might not just stop at wireless. Quite objectively, America is becoming more KGBish, as shown by increased surveillance going far beyond the understandable need to fight terrorism. Let&#8217;s hope the country will change directions soon. As important as I believe is the issue of copyright, the First Amendment as a whole counts even more. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/comment-page-1/#comment-690990</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-690990</guid>
		<description>The real issue as I see it is not censorship of content (although that probably is a concern) but state regulatory power  over methods to share infringing content.  Kindle is probably a special case because the seller/manufacturer is providing wireless access as part of the product. In this case, it concerns not merely state regulation but the ability of a product seller to limit the use of its network. (Presumably if consumers had the ability to download pirated content unencumbered, they would buy fewer Amazon ebooks). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real issue as I see it is not censorship of content (although that probably is a concern) but state regulatory power  over methods to share infringing content.  Kindle is probably a special case because the seller/manufacturer is providing wireless access as part of the product. In this case, it concerns not merely state regulation but the ability of a product seller to limit the use of its network. (Presumably if consumers had the ability to download pirated content unencumbered, they would buy fewer Amazon ebooks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
