<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Read an E-Book Week, March 9-15</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:49:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacob LaCivita</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/comment-page-1/#comment-724677</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob LaCivita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/#comment-724677</guid>
		<description>Is is March 9-15 or March 2-8?  I&#039;m finding conflicting reports online (imagine that...), but the news release you link to at the top says March 2-8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is is March 9-15 or March 2-8?  I&#8217;m finding conflicting reports online (imagine that&#8230;), but the news release you link to at the top says March 2-8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/comment-page-1/#comment-718746</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/#comment-718746</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see, if I read 120 books per year and the Kindle lasts for even 5 years that is a device smaller than a book to replace 600 books in land fill.  Pretty good trade off I would say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see, if I read 120 books per year and the Kindle lasts for even 5 years that is a device smaller than a book to replace 600 books in land fill.  Pretty good trade off I would say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/comment-page-1/#comment-718745</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/#comment-718745</guid>
		<description>Many books are now published in the far east, and the issues of environmental damage to Asian forests are non-trivial--something the book industry is (perhaps belatedly) concerning itself with. Many of the inks used in printing also include toxic elements.

Shipping paper books from Asia to American warehouses, to retail establishments or retail through UPS to individual homes adds to the environmental cost of paper. 

I certainly agree, however, that we as eBook readers and vendors, need to be aware of our own environmental footprint. I hope that Sony, Amazon, and eBookWise will all actively pursue recycling strategies (I also hope Palm, HP, and other PDA makers will do the same). 

As I&#039;ve mentioned before, one of the little-considered environmental costs of paper books is the need for huge environmentally controlled storage areas for owned books. What percentage of your home is devoted to books rather than people? 

Rob Preece
Publisher, www.BooksForABuck.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many books are now published in the far east, and the issues of environmental damage to Asian forests are non-trivial&#8211;something the book industry is (perhaps belatedly) concerning itself with. Many of the inks used in printing also include toxic elements.</p>
<p>Shipping paper books from Asia to American warehouses, to retail establishments or retail through UPS to individual homes adds to the environmental cost of paper. </p>
<p>I certainly agree, however, that we as eBook readers and vendors, need to be aware of our own environmental footprint. I hope that Sony, Amazon, and eBookWise will all actively pursue recycling strategies (I also hope Palm, HP, and other PDA makers will do the same). </p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve mentioned before, one of the little-considered environmental costs of paper books is the need for huge environmentally controlled storage areas for owned books. What percentage of your home is devoted to books rather than people? </p>
<p>Rob Preece<br />
Publisher, <a href="http://www.BooksForABuck.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.BooksForABuck.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Martinengo</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/comment-page-1/#comment-718667</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Martinengo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/#comment-718667</guid>
		<description>Consider also that current ebook reading devices, manufactured with plenty of non-renewable and toxic materials, will end up in landfill in a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider also that current ebook reading devices, manufactured with plenty of non-renewable and toxic materials, will end up in landfill in a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Monks</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/comment-page-1/#comment-718578</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Monks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/02/17/read-an-e-book-week-march-9-15/#comment-718578</guid>
		<description>Oh puhlease... almost all trees harvested for paper are from fast-growing sustainable sources. It&#039;s hardwoods that are under threat. Despite this, I broadly agree with the sentiment that there&#039;s an environmental impact (primarily in bleaching the paper, I think, not to mention transporting tons of it all over the world.) with p-books but I don&#039;t think there&#039;s much to fear from a sudden book-buying craze taking my breath away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh puhlease&#8230; almost all trees harvested for paper are from fast-growing sustainable sources. It&#8217;s hardwoods that are under threat. Despite this, I broadly agree with the sentiment that there&#8217;s an environmental impact (primarily in bleaching the paper, I think, not to mention transporting tons of it all over the world.) with p-books but I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s much to fear from a sudden book-buying craze taking my breath away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
