<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Booklamp&#8217;s algorithms: A way to connect books with agents and publishers&#8212;and regular readers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/03/20/booklamps-algorithms-a-way-to-connect-books-with-agents-and-publishers-and-regular-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/03/20/booklamps-algorithms-a-way-to-connect-books-with-agents-and-publishers-and-regular-readers/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/03/20/booklamps-algorithms-a-way-to-connect-books-with-agents-and-publishers-and-regular-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-740815</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/03/20/booklamps-algorithms-a-way-to-connect-books-with-agents-and-publishers-and-regular-readers/#comment-740815</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;And, yes, Mike, I heartily dislike the idea of algorithms being the only way to determine what gets published.

Then just use them a frikkin twit screens.

This ms has X number of grammatical errors, X number of typos, first-grade level of vocabulary = FAIL.

I mean, if someone can&#039;t frikkin *write* to begin with, clear the decks for those who can!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;And, yes, Mike, I heartily dislike the idea of algorithms being the only way to determine what gets published.</p>
<p>Then just use them a frikkin twit screens.</p>
<p>This ms has X number of grammatical errors, X number of typos, first-grade level of vocabulary = FAIL.</p>
<p>I mean, if someone can&#8217;t frikkin *write* to begin with, clear the decks for those who can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garson O'Toole</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/03/20/booklamps-algorithms-a-way-to-connect-books-with-agents-and-publishers-and-regular-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-740762</link>
		<dc:creator>Garson O'Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/03/20/booklamps-algorithms-a-way-to-connect-books-with-agents-and-publishers-and-regular-readers/#comment-740762</guid>
		<description>BookLamp submits the full-text of novels to the analytical depredations of an algorithm. There is another odd service that algorithmically crunches only the book title. Lulu, the publishing company, operates a web page with “Titlescorer” which is a system that supposedly examines a book title to determine if “it has what it takes for bestseller success.” Here is what Lulu says:&lt;blockquote&gt;The &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.lulu.com/titlescorer/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lulu Titlescorer&lt;/A&gt; has been developed exclusively for Lulu by statisticians who studied the titles of 50 years&#039; worth of top bestsellers and identified which title attributes separated the bestsellers from the rest. We commissioned a research team to analyze the title of every novel to have topped the hardback fiction section of the New York Times Bestseller List during the half-century from 1955 to 2004 and then compare them with the titles of a control group of less successful novels by the same authors. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Titlescorer gives the petitioner a numerical score that represents the percent chance that the input title will become a bestseller. The values given are absurdly high. But it does provide encouragement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BookLamp submits the full-text of novels to the analytical depredations of an algorithm. There is another odd service that algorithmically crunches only the book title. Lulu, the publishing company, operates a web page with “Titlescorer” which is a system that supposedly examines a book title to determine if “it has what it takes for bestseller success.” Here is what Lulu says:<br />
<blockquote>The <a HREF="http://www.lulu.com/titlescorer/" rel="nofollow">Lulu Titlescorer</a> has been developed exclusively for Lulu by statisticians who studied the titles of 50 years&#8217; worth of top bestsellers and identified which title attributes separated the bestsellers from the rest. We commissioned a research team to analyze the title of every novel to have topped the hardback fiction section of the New York Times Bestseller List during the half-century from 1955 to 2004 and then compare them with the titles of a control group of less successful novels by the same authors. </p></blockquote>
<p>Titlescorer gives the petitioner a numerical score that represents the percent chance that the input title will become a bestseller. The values given are absurdly high. But it does provide encouragement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
