<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iRex&#8217;s green stats for the iLiad e-reader vs. a printout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/04/17/irexs-green-stats-for-the-iliad-e-reader-vs-a-printout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/04/17/irexs-green-stats-for-the-iliad-e-reader-vs-a-printout/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:23:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/04/17/irexs-green-stats-for-the-iliad-e-reader-vs-a-printout/comment-page-1/#comment-766681</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/17/irexs-green-stats-for-the-iliad-e-reader-vs-a-printout/#comment-766681</guid>
		<description>If you have to buy fewer printers and print cartridges, you&#039;ll offset the manufacturing issues with the reader.

I&#039;m glad to see reader makers pushing this angle. Chopping down trees, grinding them up, hauling the resulting pulp around in trains and trucks, and finally driving down to pick up a ream or case at the local office supply store is resource-intensive. I read that paper consumption is finally falling--we&#039;re a long way from the paperless office but reading on the computer rather than paper generation on the computer is an increasing thing.

Rob Preece
Publisher, www.BooksForABuck.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have to buy fewer printers and print cartridges, you&#8217;ll offset the manufacturing issues with the reader.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to see reader makers pushing this angle. Chopping down trees, grinding them up, hauling the resulting pulp around in trains and trucks, and finally driving down to pick up a ream or case at the local office supply store is resource-intensive. I read that paper consumption is finally falling&#8211;we&#8217;re a long way from the paperless office but reading on the computer rather than paper generation on the computer is an increasing thing.</p>
<p>Rob Preece<br />
Publisher, <a href="http://www.BooksForABuck.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.BooksForABuck.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
