<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tiny, cheap and kinda fit for e-books: List of Liliputers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/04/27/tiny-cheap-and-kinda-fit-for-e-books-list-of-liliputers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/04/27/tiny-cheap-and-kinda-fit-for-e-books-list-of-liliputers/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:49:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/04/27/tiny-cheap-and-kinda-fit-for-e-books-list-of-liliputers/comment-page-1/#comment-777169</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/27/tiny-cheap-and-kinda-fit-for-e-books-list-of-liliputers/#comment-777169</guid>
		<description>LOL. Just a few days ago, another guy was complaining res wasn&#039;t good enough. Hey, Nate, let&#039;s hope most folks agree with you. 

Thanks,
David (who actually can recall reading off monitors much worse than VGA)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. Just a few days ago, another guy was complaining res wasn&#8217;t good enough. Hey, Nate, let&#8217;s hope most folks agree with you. </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David (who actually can recall reading off monitors much worse than VGA)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate the great</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/04/27/tiny-cheap-and-kinda-fit-for-e-books-list-of-liliputers/comment-page-1/#comment-777166</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate the great</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/27/tiny-cheap-and-kinda-fit-for-e-books-list-of-liliputers/#comment-777166</guid>
		<description>&quot;Downside is that the resolution on the seven inch screen could be better for e-reading—it’s 800 x 480 pixel.&quot;

 My first computer had a 12&quot; monitor with VGA resolution. I read on that just fine. I&#039;m sure you had a similar screen back in the day. Any screen that has a higher DPI is just gravy. Stop whining you big baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Downside is that the resolution on the seven inch screen could be better for e-reading—it’s 800 x 480 pixel.&#8221;</p>
<p> My first computer had a 12&#8243; monitor with VGA resolution. I read on that just fine. I&#8217;m sure you had a similar screen back in the day. Any screen that has a higher DPI is just gravy. Stop whining you big baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
