<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better e-reading ahead on new BlackBerries&#8212;with improved screen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/12/better-e-reading-ahead-on-new-blackberries-with-improved-screen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/12/better-e-reading-ahead-on-new-blackberries-with-improved-screen/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/12/better-e-reading-ahead-on-new-blackberries-with-improved-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-801773</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/12/better-e-reading-ahead-on-new-blackberries-with-improved-screen/#comment-801773</guid>
		<description>&quot;Agree, Brian–as noted in the copy&quot;

Oops..skimmed through that too quickly.

I&#039;d be interested to see a touch-screen Berry with a soft-keyboard like the iphone. Not sure if thats doable patent-wise, but the one thing i like about the Berry is the local file storage and the 3rd party apps both of which Apple seems to want to severely limit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Agree, Brian–as noted in the copy&#8221;</p>
<p>Oops..skimmed through that too quickly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see a touch-screen Berry with a soft-keyboard like the iphone. Not sure if thats doable patent-wise, but the one thing i like about the Berry is the local file storage and the 3rd party apps both of which Apple seems to want to severely limit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/12/better-e-reading-ahead-on-new-blackberries-with-improved-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-796611</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/12/better-e-reading-ahead-on-new-blackberries-with-improved-screen/#comment-796611</guid>
		<description>Agree, Brian--as noted in the copy. But other Blackberry models will be coming out, and I&#039;d hope that RIM would have the smarts to do one that was good for books, too, not just communications. There is a huge market for good all-in-one devices, just as there&#039;ll be a smaller one for book-optimized gizmos. Thanks. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, Brian&#8211;as noted in the copy. But other Blackberry models will be coming out, and I&#8217;d hope that RIM would have the smarts to do one that was good for books, too, not just communications. There is a huge market for good all-in-one devices, just as there&#8217;ll be a smaller one for book-optimized gizmos. Thanks. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/12/better-e-reading-ahead-on-new-blackberries-with-improved-screen/comment-page-1/#comment-796566</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/12/better-e-reading-ahead-on-new-blackberries-with-improved-screen/#comment-796566</guid>
		<description>I love my Blackberry, but for reading screen *size* is a bit more important than just absolute screen *resolution* and this still looks like a very small screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my Blackberry, but for reading screen *size* is a bit more important than just absolute screen *resolution* and this still looks like a very small screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
