<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How ePub beats obsolescence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/15/how-epub-beats-obsolescence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/15/how-epub-beats-obsolescence/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CircleReader</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/15/how-epub-beats-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-801500</link>
		<dc:creator>CircleReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/15/how-epub-beats-obsolescence/#comment-801500</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your thoughts, Jon! 

Breaking obsolescence into separate playback and fidelity components is helpful. The other point about the use of high-fidelity formats is that it lends itself to a LOCKSS* strategy that could keep individual works from becoming as scarce as your old 78 up there. If the publisher has the only high-definition copy, what happens if it gets lost, damaged, or intentionally destroyed?

When obsolescence is brought up, I always find myself thinking about the related problem of access, in the sense of open standards vs DRM, but also in the senses of &quot;I can afford access to this information with its associated technology, but you can&#039;t,&quot; and &quot;My human-readable physical photo albums are more accessible to my two-year-old and my non-computer-using mother than any digital format could be.&quot; So maybe there are some similar distinctions to be made in that realm....


*Lots Of Copies Keep Stuff Safe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughts, Jon! </p>
<p>Breaking obsolescence into separate playback and fidelity components is helpful. The other point about the use of high-fidelity formats is that it lends itself to a LOCKSS* strategy that could keep individual works from becoming as scarce as your old 78 up there. If the publisher has the only high-definition copy, what happens if it gets lost, damaged, or intentionally destroyed?</p>
<p>When obsolescence is brought up, I always find myself thinking about the related problem of access, in the sense of open standards vs DRM, but also in the senses of &#8220;I can afford access to this information with its associated technology, but you can&#8217;t,&#8221; and &#8220;My human-readable physical photo albums are more accessible to my two-year-old and my non-computer-using mother than any digital format could be.&#8221; So maybe there are some similar distinctions to be made in that realm&#8230;.</p>
<p>*Lots Of Copies Keep Stuff Safe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Noring</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/15/how-epub-beats-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-801473</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Noring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/15/how-epub-beats-obsolescence/#comment-801473</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Nick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Nick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/15/how-epub-beats-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-801319</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/15/how-epub-beats-obsolescence/#comment-801319</guid>
		<description>Excellent, well written and informative post. I&#039;d love to see more of these and a lot less &quot;can random device x be used as an ebook reader&quot;? And &quot;ebook perspective on random development x&quot; posts. I&#039;m sorry to say I frequently skip over your articles in my reader, and it would be a real shame to miss gems like this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, well written and informative post. I&#8217;d love to see more of these and a lot less &#8220;can random device x be used as an ebook reader&#8221;? And &#8220;ebook perspective on random development x&#8221; posts. I&#8217;m sorry to say I frequently skip over your articles in my reader, and it would be a real shame to miss gems like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Districts Entertainment Blog &#187; How ePub beats obsolescence</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/05/15/how-epub-beats-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-800564</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Districts Entertainment Blog &#187; How ePub beats obsolescence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/15/how-epub-beats-obsolescence/#comment-800564</guid>
		<description>[...] TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home created an interesting post today on How ePub beats obsolescenceHere&#8217;s a short outline [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home created an interesting post today on How ePub beats obsolescenceHere&#8217;s a short outline [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
