TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home

News & views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics
May 22nd, 2008

Why NYT’s David Pogue distrusts E

By David Rothman

image "Unfortunately, I’ve had terrible experiences releasing my books in electronic form. Twice in my career, ‘blind’ people e-mailed me, requesting a PDF of one of my books. Both times, I sent one over––and both times, it was all over the piracy sites within 48 hours, free for anyone to download." - David Pogue, New York Times columnist, on copyright issues.

The TeleRead take: OK, gang, how would you respond?

Related: No Free Lunch Department: U.K. novelist Richard Herley takes shareware book site down.

Digg us! Slashdot us! Share the news.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Netvouz
  • YahooMyWeb

6 Responses to “Why NYT’s David Pogue distrusts E”

  1. I think this speaks high of Pogue as he was desiring to assist people with special needs. On the other hand, wouldn’t it make sense to sell a digital edition where their personal information was required for the transaction (I’m thinking Paypal type account that requires authentication of a person’s identity through bank verification, etc.). At least this way he would have someone to hold responsible for the unapproved distribution.

    Of course, incorporating a social DRM type solution would be worth exploring. And perhaps a regular DRM solution for the short term (though obviously less desirable).

    I’m sure others might mention that having an electronic edition may actually increase exposure and also increase pbook sales. Anyway, I think characterizing an entire industry based upon what happened in these circumstances is less than fair. Certainly he had good intentions. But he should have considered the possible problems with releasing a “naked” file before actually doing it. Perhaps his opinion would be radically different if he had made it available in a DRMed (social or otherwise) format.

  2. We’ve covered this territory before, of course.

    I believe that most people are honest. If you make it easy to purchase an ebook at a reasonable price, people will do that.

    Of the smaller percentage of folks who use pirate sites, torrents, usenet:

    (1) how many of them would have purchased the book otherwise?

    (2) how many of them will seek out other works by the author after being introduced to his or her work via the “dark side”?

    I do understand the pain that is caused to authors when their works are illegally shared. But the alternative of treating all of us as potential pirates is simply not the answer.

    I don’t grab pirated works…but I also will not purchase ebooks, music or other media that are burdened with DRM. I’ve been burned in the past, and will not be again.

  3. He’s lumped everyone in together as pirates which isn’t fair.

    However, he also brought up valid points about how giving stuff (in this case e-books) away for free doesn’t work either.

    Folks may not like it, but, if the old adage of “you get what you pay for” is true, exactly what is the value of “free” again?

    We’ve already seen this whole “pay what you feel it is worth AFTER you’ve already downloaded (whatever)” doesn’t work.

    But to write off all e-books because some unscrupulous individuals played on Pogue’s sympathy (he was trying to do the right thing) isn’t fair.

  4. gnawingonfoot Says:
    May 23rd, 2008 at 7:22 am

    My response would be:

    “Hello Mr. Pogue. I, the rightful prince of Southern Nigeria, am a recent heir to a sum of $26,000,000. My father was recently assassinated, and in the resulting political turmoil, I was sent into exodus. I need YOUR HELP to smuggle this money out of the country. All I need from you is…”

    That and I’ll tell him that PDF is a shlock ebook format. I don’t know why the pirates would even want anything in it.

  5. I agree with Don’s first sentence. This speaks very highly of Mr. Pogue. That said, the correct response is that this is, alas, inevitable. Pretty much any book of interest is available on warez sites or newsgroups regardless of whether or not it has ever been released in e format. Scanners are dirt cheap these days, and it’s not a big deal to scan an entire book into PDF and OCR it. Is the result as good as the sort of PDF edition that Pogue is likely to have? No. Is it good enough? Yes.

    Other than that, Pogue’s article seems to be a rehashing of Steven Poole’s arguments based on Trigger Happy, which I’ve railed against here, but consider this cluelessness re RadioHead:

    “As Mr. Poole points out, that’s fine if you’re already an established name: “If there’s been a comparable success by a band that hasn’t already gained its cultural capital and name-recognition through the evils of copyright and corporate promotion, I’d like to know about it.””

    No there isn’t a Radiohead indie story out there, but there are a lot of bands that I listen to and have actually paid for their music who essentially started by largely giving their music away, and working hard to build a community around their music.

    Again, look at Cory Doctorow. Why can Cory give his books away and still report his publishers see very good sales. Is Doctorow uber-famous like Radiohead? No. But he is very well known to the group most likely to be interested in the sort of novels he writes and he has worked his ass off the past decade building up a community around him (and not just in some lame marketing shlock way).

    Instead of talking to Steve Pool about why his experiment failed (and, frankly, it was inevitable that it would), Pogue would be better served by talking to John Scalzi and Cory Doctorow or the folks at Baen about how they’ve been able to achieve good sales figures even though so much of what they have in print is available for free on the intertubes. Seriously, if Pogue was correct then Baen should have been out of business years ago since you can download every single novel they’ve ever sold from one warez site or another. The second it comes out in non-DRMed form, someone uploads it.

    The problem seems to be, IMO, that Pogue and others are treating the Internet like a bookstore. When I walk into Borders they give favorable display space to some books and others I come across, so to some extent just being there on the shelves is a great inducement for a sale. Just having the electronic version of your book available for sale somewhere on the Internet, however, pretty much doesn’t mean squat and isn’t going to get you anywhere saleswise.

  6. I leave Pogue alone and go after someone he cited: Poole.

    Really, twice within the span of a week?

    http://mikecane2008.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/writer-steven-poole-gets-bad-news-too/

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting