<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heating up: Fuss over Kindle vs. iPhone for e-reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kindle For iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-1017220</link>
		<dc:creator>Kindle For iPhone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/#comment-1017220</guid>
		<description>Amazon has just released a Kindle app for iPhone. So it&#039;s no longer Kindle vs. iPhone but Kindle for iPhone :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon has just released a Kindle app for iPhone. So it&#8217;s no longer Kindle vs. iPhone but Kindle for iPhone <img src='http://www.teleread.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of iPhones and e-books &#171; Surf&#8217;s Up</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-846426</link>
		<dc:creator>Of iPhones and e-books &#171; Surf&#8217;s Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 02:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/#comment-846426</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/" rel="nofollow">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Kindle &#183; Sunday Night Links #10: 29 June 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-837629</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Kindle &#183; Sunday Night Links #10: 29 June 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/#comment-837629</guid>
		<description>[...] Heating up: Fuss over Kindle vs. iPhone for e-reading - TeleRead [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Heating up: Fuss over Kindle vs. iPhone for e-reading &#8211; TeleRead [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-834972</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/#comment-834972</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;the iPhone text is too small

Huh?

Did you see this?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=9I9UpmWasxY

Is that &quot;small&quot; to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;the iPhone text is too small</p>
<p>Huh?</p>
<p>Did you see this?</p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=9I9UpmWasxY" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=9I9UpmWasxY</a></p>
<p>Is that &#8220;small&#8221; to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-834962</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/#comment-834962</guid>
		<description>Last night Karen and I visited the local Apple store to study the current iPhone and consider if we would be willing to replace our Verizon phones with, um, AT&amp;T.

I verified that using iPhone on Project Gutenberg files in HTML or Text was disfunctional. However, properly formatted or flowable text should be readable--at least by young whippersnappers with young eyeballs.

The Apple salesman couldn&#039;t tell me anything about potential e-book software coming through the third-party program. Perhaps on July 11 we will learn everything we need to know.

Meanwhile, as a certifiably Old guy, I have to agree that the iPhone text is too small; but I&#039;m hoping that flowable, size-changeable text will be usable, with or without reading glasses or the old hold-it-up-right next-to-your-immensely-nearsighted-eyes trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night Karen and I visited the local Apple store to study the current iPhone and consider if we would be willing to replace our Verizon phones with, um, AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>I verified that using iPhone on Project Gutenberg files in HTML or Text was disfunctional. However, properly formatted or flowable text should be readable&#8211;at least by young whippersnappers with young eyeballs.</p>
<p>The Apple salesman couldn&#8217;t tell me anything about potential e-book software coming through the third-party program. Perhaps on July 11 we will learn everything we need to know.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, as a certifiably Old guy, I have to agree that the iPhone text is too small; but I&#8217;m hoping that flowable, size-changeable text will be usable, with or without reading glasses or the old hold-it-up-right next-to-your-immensely-nearsighted-eyes trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Ballard</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-834883</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Ballard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/#comment-834883</guid>
		<description>The best solution would be a technology that would permit all of us to see like twenty year olds.

Kindles Rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best solution would be a technology that would permit all of us to see like twenty year olds.</p>
<p>Kindles Rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-834667</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/#comment-834667</guid>
		<description>Hey, Debra, thanks for your thoughtful comments, especially the &quot;in the beholder&quot; one. Not scientifically, just informally, I&#039;ve reached the conclusion that older people as a group may have more problems with E Ink&#039;s contrast or lack thereof. But there&#039;d be many departures from the norm as I perceive it. Furthermore, we know that E Ink contrast is going to get &lt;em&gt;much&lt;/em&gt; better. As for what features and how many features on future cellphones/readers, let&#039;s hope that many choices will be available! Thanks. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Debra, thanks for your thoughtful comments, especially the &#8220;in the beholder&#8221; one. Not scientifically, just informally, I&#8217;ve reached the conclusion that older people as a group may have more problems with E Ink&#8217;s contrast or lack thereof. But there&#8217;d be many departures from the norm as I perceive it. Furthermore, we know that E Ink contrast is going to get <em>much</em> better. As for what features and how many features on future cellphones/readers, let&#8217;s hope that many choices will be available! Thanks. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra Hyde</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-834634</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra Hyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/#comment-834634</guid>
		<description>My aging eyes need E-Ink while my husband&#039;s far less compromised eyes are perfectly happy with his PDA.  So maybe, as you suggest, e-reading avenues are in the eye of the beholder.

I can easily understand the desire for gadget consolidation, but my Sony Reader fits into my small purse just fine.  And, given the choice, I&#039;d rather have a small cell phone in my handbag than a larger, multi-functioned phone.  It really comes down to priorities, I suppose, and my reader&#039;s far more beloved than my cell phone.

That said, I&#039;m certainly open to your vision of a future cell phone that incorporates e-ink into its mix.  But I gotta tell ya, the purchase price will have to be low because the device will have to chance my perspective on the cell phone.  Which is what?  That it&#039;s just a basic necessity, no bells and whistles needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My aging eyes need E-Ink while my husband&#8217;s far less compromised eyes are perfectly happy with his PDA.  So maybe, as you suggest, e-reading avenues are in the eye of the beholder.</p>
<p>I can easily understand the desire for gadget consolidation, but my Sony Reader fits into my small purse just fine.  And, given the choice, I&#8217;d rather have a small cell phone in my handbag than a larger, multi-functioned phone.  It really comes down to priorities, I suppose, and my reader&#8217;s far more beloved than my cell phone.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m certainly open to your vision of a future cell phone that incorporates e-ink into its mix.  But I gotta tell ya, the purchase price will have to be low because the device will have to chance my perspective on the cell phone.  Which is what?  That it&#8217;s just a basic necessity, no bells and whistles needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoda47</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/comment-page-1/#comment-834614</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoda47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/25/heating-up-fuss-over-kindle-vs-iphone-for-e-reading/#comment-834614</guid>
		<description>Gee, if only there was some kind of standard format, so we could buy a ebook and read it on whatever hardware we wanted....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, if only there was some kind of standard format, so we could buy a ebook and read it on whatever hardware we wanted&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
