<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top ten self-publishing myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-1028883</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-1028883</guid>
		<description>Debra
I wonder if being illiterate has anything to do with not being able to &quot;pull the wool&quot; over Oprah&#039;s eyes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debra<br />
I wonder if being illiterate has anything to do with not being able to &#8220;pull the wool&#8221; over Oprah&#8217;s eyes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debra</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-1020436</link>
		<dc:creator>Debra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-1020436</guid>
		<description>Junior high, high school, college and other coursework: all have said throughout &quot;you&#039;re a natural.&quot;  Well, &quot; natural UNKNOWN!&quot; 
I am finding nothing but vanity and self-publishers out &quot;there&quot; for a compilation of self-made poetry, prose and essay.  Everyone want 1900 - 3500 bucks to put me into print and then wants me to peddle it!
Hmmmmmm.......any hope for anyone who can&#039;t pull the wool over Oprah&#039;s eyes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Junior high, high school, college and other coursework: all have said throughout &#8220;you&#8217;re a natural.&#8221;  Well, &#8221; natural UNKNOWN!&#8221;<br />
I am finding nothing but vanity and self-publishers out &#8220;there&#8221; for a compilation of self-made poetry, prose and essay.  Everyone want 1900 &#8211; 3500 bucks to put me into print and then wants me to peddle it!<br />
Hmmmmmm&#8230;&#8230;.any hope for anyone who can&#8217;t pull the wool over Oprah&#8217;s eyes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-1013348</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-1013348</guid>
		<description>There are so many people publishing but the supply of readers is dwindling if we are to believe current news reports. Here is a website devoted to covers. Knowing what you like and what your competition is doing can be helpful. http://www.bookcoverarchive.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many people publishing but the supply of readers is dwindling if we are to believe current news reports. Here is a website devoted to covers. Knowing what you like and what your competition is doing can be helpful. <a href="http://www.bookcoverarchive.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookcoverarchive.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah Z</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-1009859</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-1009859</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent Sampson, the CEO of Outskirts Press, wrote an article in response to this NY Times, and it’s here: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/am8qu4" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/am8qu4</a></p>
<p>Leah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April L. Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-955387</link>
		<dc:creator>April L. Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-955387</guid>
		<description>Rostaria -
Good for you!  Things ARE changing out there, and you can rest assured that as an indie author, you&#039;re part of a growing minority---a minority that&#039;s being met with increasing acceptance. I&#039;m currently blogging my how-to book in serialized form here:
http://aprillhamilton.blogspot.com

Also, you may find some resources and links of interest on my website:
http://www.aprillhamilton.com

Blue skies!  =&#039;D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rostaria -<br />
Good for you!  Things ARE changing out there, and you can rest assured that as an indie author, you&#8217;re part of a growing minority&#8212;a minority that&#8217;s being met with increasing acceptance. I&#8217;m currently blogging my how-to book in serialized form here:<br />
<a href="http://aprillhamilton.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://aprillhamilton.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>Also, you may find some resources and links of interest on my website:<br />
<a href="http://www.aprillhamilton.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.aprillhamilton.com</a></p>
<p>Blue skies!  =&#8217;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rostaria B Orion</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-953181</link>
		<dc:creator>Rostaria B Orion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-953181</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this blog, I read it with interest and fasination. I have sold 124 copies of my first novel, I am Print-on-demand. Intend to release its sequel next year.
you begin to relise that you are in a dog eat dog world when it comes to publishing, wether its Mainstream or the like. It is a bit of a shame that PODs get looked down upon, until u start selling loads of copies, my friend took six of my books to a fair and sold them all in 1 hour, he would sold more if it wasnt for the fact that I was running short on copies.
Everything you have said is true, thanks
Ros</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this blog, I read it with interest and fasination. I have sold 124 copies of my first novel, I am Print-on-demand. Intend to release its sequel next year.<br />
you begin to relise that you are in a dog eat dog world when it comes to publishing, wether its Mainstream or the like. It is a bit of a shame that PODs get looked down upon, until u start selling loads of copies, my friend took six of my books to a fair and sold them all in 1 hour, he would sold more if it wasnt for the fact that I was running short on copies.<br />
Everything you have said is true, thanks<br />
Ros</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April L. Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-951708</link>
		<dc:creator>April L. Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-951708</guid>
		<description>Kate-

There&#039;s only so much one can fit into a single article, which is why I&#039;ve written an entire, how-to reference book on indie authorship. I will never understand why someone will assume that just because I haven&#039;t explicitly said this or that specific thing in a single, specific article, I must be unaware of that thing or advocating against that thing.  

OF COURSE an indie author must put considerable effort into marketing and promotion; I never proposed that they should just get the book out there and wait for the royalties to roll in.

OF COURSE an indie author must do everything in his or her power to create a quality product that can stand toe-to-toe against a mainstream-published book.

OF COURSE there are indie author success stories among both POD and minimum-print-run indie authors.  Personally, I feel POD is the better way to go nowadays because it&#039;s far less expensive for the author, it&#039;s far more &#039;green&#039; (less waste from manufacture &amp; shipping, no remaindered cartons of books to be shipped back to manufacturer and destroyed), and doesn&#039;t require the author to either store large quantities of books or hand-sell them. I&#039;m a big advocate of ebooks, as well.

If you&#039;re truly interested in ALL I have to say on the subject of indie authorship, I suggest you pick up a copy of The IndieAuthor Guide on Amazon --- which was published via POD, of course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate-</p>
<p>There&#8217;s only so much one can fit into a single article, which is why I&#8217;ve written an entire, how-to reference book on indie authorship. I will never understand why someone will assume that just because I haven&#8217;t explicitly said this or that specific thing in a single, specific article, I must be unaware of that thing or advocating against that thing.  </p>
<p>OF COURSE an indie author must put considerable effort into marketing and promotion; I never proposed that they should just get the book out there and wait for the royalties to roll in.</p>
<p>OF COURSE an indie author must do everything in his or her power to create a quality product that can stand toe-to-toe against a mainstream-published book.</p>
<p>OF COURSE there are indie author success stories among both POD and minimum-print-run indie authors.  Personally, I feel POD is the better way to go nowadays because it&#8217;s far less expensive for the author, it&#8217;s far more &#8216;green&#8217; (less waste from manufacture &amp; shipping, no remaindered cartons of books to be shipped back to manufacturer and destroyed), and doesn&#8217;t require the author to either store large quantities of books or hand-sell them. I&#8217;m a big advocate of ebooks, as well.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re truly interested in ALL I have to say on the subject of indie authorship, I suggest you pick up a copy of The IndieAuthor Guide on Amazon &#8212; which was published via POD, of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe Winters</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-951662</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe Winters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-951662</guid>
		<description>Oh and I forgot Pamela Aidan.  I&#039;m fairly certain she used offset press, though I&#039;m not sure.  But I think it&#039;s important to note, she published her Mr. Darcy novels on her own, because she believed it was a better business decision than seeking a publisher.

It took three offers from Simon and Schuster before she accepted a contract.  She wasn&#039;t too quick to jump at a contract, so obviously she was doing just fine on her own.  In fact the reason she was offered one is because her sales were impressive.  They approached her.

How can one have impressive sales on their own if it&#039;s impossible to do anything without a NY publisher?

Clearly if a major publisher offers a really good deal, most authors will take it, but the kind of success most of the self published books that got picked up experienced, are far above and beyond the success level of most traditionally published books.

Plenty of books published by NY houses make very little money for the authors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and I forgot Pamela Aidan.  I&#8217;m fairly certain she used offset press, though I&#8217;m not sure.  But I think it&#8217;s important to note, she published her Mr. Darcy novels on her own, because she believed it was a better business decision than seeking a publisher.</p>
<p>It took three offers from Simon and Schuster before she accepted a contract.  She wasn&#8217;t too quick to jump at a contract, so obviously she was doing just fine on her own.  In fact the reason she was offered one is because her sales were impressive.  They approached her.</p>
<p>How can one have impressive sales on their own if it&#8217;s impossible to do anything without a NY publisher?</p>
<p>Clearly if a major publisher offers a really good deal, most authors will take it, but the kind of success most of the self published books that got picked up experienced, are far above and beyond the success level of most traditionally published books.</p>
<p>Plenty of books published by NY houses make very little money for the authors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe Winters</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-951656</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe Winters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-951656</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure anyone said that Garamond was breaking the rules of publishing, but a lot of people IN publishing don&#039;t care for Garamond.  it&#039;s one of those: &quot;It&#039;s technically okay, but we don&#039;t like it&quot; fonts.

While the examples she used were not self publishing success stories that used print-on-demand technology, someone should point out that there have been POD success stories.

Jeremy Robinson has gotten a 3 book deal from a division of St. Martin&#039;s Press, which happened after he published a book with POD, and got James Rollins to blurb it, and got an agent.  None of that would have happened had he not put his own book out.

And he wouldn&#039;t have been able to put his own book out if it weren&#039;t for POD.

But others have followed that trend.

And it hasn&#039;t just been POD.  It&#039;s been ebooks and podcasts as well.  There is a big wide world out there of formats to put your work in and ways to get it into people&#039;s hands.

There is nothing &quot;magic&quot; about offset printing.  Many large publishers use POD through Lightning Source for their backlist.  POD is a technology and nothing more.

Connie Shelton is an author who started her own imprint with the purpose of publishing her own books.  Intrigue Press.  Later she branched out to publish other authors, but not because she had to, because she kept getting submissions and found worthy books.

She continues to publish her own books.  So obviously it&#039;s a good business model for some people.  Though yes, she uses offset printing.  But Samhain a major romance epub uses POD for their print books.  And they aren&#039;t even self published.

It also depends on how you define &quot;success.&quot;  Since an indie, even using POD technology can end up making 4 times as much per book as a trad published author, then they obviously have to sell 1/4th the same number a trad published author would for the same amount of money.

I agree that professional design is important.

I don&#039;t agree that offset print runs are necessary.

I don&#039;t think you need &quot;contacts&quot; unless you use them instead of glasses.

No one has just stuck a book anywhere and made much money off it.  Marketing is a big part of the picture.  But with the internet, it&#039;s not nearly as hard to reach potential readers as it once was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure anyone said that Garamond was breaking the rules of publishing, but a lot of people IN publishing don&#8217;t care for Garamond.  it&#8217;s one of those: &#8220;It&#8217;s technically okay, but we don&#8217;t like it&#8221; fonts.</p>
<p>While the examples she used were not self publishing success stories that used print-on-demand technology, someone should point out that there have been POD success stories.</p>
<p>Jeremy Robinson has gotten a 3 book deal from a division of St. Martin&#8217;s Press, which happened after he published a book with POD, and got James Rollins to blurb it, and got an agent.  None of that would have happened had he not put his own book out.</p>
<p>And he wouldn&#8217;t have been able to put his own book out if it weren&#8217;t for POD.</p>
<p>But others have followed that trend.</p>
<p>And it hasn&#8217;t just been POD.  It&#8217;s been ebooks and podcasts as well.  There is a big wide world out there of formats to put your work in and ways to get it into people&#8217;s hands.</p>
<p>There is nothing &#8220;magic&#8221; about offset printing.  Many large publishers use POD through Lightning Source for their backlist.  POD is a technology and nothing more.</p>
<p>Connie Shelton is an author who started her own imprint with the purpose of publishing her own books.  Intrigue Press.  Later she branched out to publish other authors, but not because she had to, because she kept getting submissions and found worthy books.</p>
<p>She continues to publish her own books.  So obviously it&#8217;s a good business model for some people.  Though yes, she uses offset printing.  But Samhain a major romance epub uses POD for their print books.  And they aren&#8217;t even self published.</p>
<p>It also depends on how you define &#8220;success.&#8221;  Since an indie, even using POD technology can end up making 4 times as much per book as a trad published author, then they obviously have to sell 1/4th the same number a trad published author would for the same amount of money.</p>
<p>I agree that professional design is important.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree that offset print runs are necessary.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you need &#8220;contacts&#8221; unless you use them instead of glasses.</p>
<p>No one has just stuck a book anywhere and made much money off it.  Marketing is a big part of the picture.  But with the internet, it&#8217;s not nearly as hard to reach potential readers as it once was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-927169</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-927169</guid>
		<description>Garamond is breaking rules of publishing? It&#039;s a very common typeface used in books. Some printings of the Harry Potter series were set in Adobe Garamond. The best seller Three Cups of Tea uses another version of Garamond.

I&#039;d also like to point out that the examples of self-publishing success stories you used, did not employ print-on-demand (POD).

The Celestine Prophecy was printed before POD was even available.

If you think Mama Paolini didn&#039;t market the heck out of Eragon on behalf of her son, you need to go back and read the numerous writer&#039;s forums (AbsoluteWrite.com, for instance) and publishing sites she posted on before she went to press. Also, the book was not a success until it was picked up by a traditional publisher, which happened in what seems like 15-minutes.

Diary of a Wimpy Kid was published online as blog entries. It was never POD. Harry N. Abrams made the author a deal to publish a series under the Amulet imprint.

Self-publishing and POD are great things, for sure. But you need to be realistic. If you want to earn money from your book, it needs to be treated like a business and the first step is to check out how every self-published book became successful.

1. Professional design??

2. Offset press runs, with plenty of ARCs sent out?

3. Previous contacts in the industry?

No one has ever just stuck a book on Amazon and made much money off of it. It&#039;s a lot of work, a lot of marketing. Very few actually make money off self-published books, quite often they are successful only after being picked up by a bigger publisher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garamond is breaking rules of publishing? It&#8217;s a very common typeface used in books. Some printings of the Harry Potter series were set in Adobe Garamond. The best seller Three Cups of Tea uses another version of Garamond.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to point out that the examples of self-publishing success stories you used, did not employ print-on-demand (POD).</p>
<p>The Celestine Prophecy was printed before POD was even available.</p>
<p>If you think Mama Paolini didn&#8217;t market the heck out of Eragon on behalf of her son, you need to go back and read the numerous writer&#8217;s forums (AbsoluteWrite.com, for instance) and publishing sites she posted on before she went to press. Also, the book was not a success until it was picked up by a traditional publisher, which happened in what seems like 15-minutes.</p>
<p>Diary of a Wimpy Kid was published online as blog entries. It was never POD. Harry N. Abrams made the author a deal to publish a series under the Amulet imprint.</p>
<p>Self-publishing and POD are great things, for sure. But you need to be realistic. If you want to earn money from your book, it needs to be treated like a business and the first step is to check out how every self-published book became successful.</p>
<p>1. Professional design??</p>
<p>2. Offset press runs, with plenty of ARCs sent out?</p>
<p>3. Previous contacts in the industry?</p>
<p>No one has ever just stuck a book on Amazon and made much money off of it. It&#8217;s a lot of work, a lot of marketing. Very few actually make money off self-published books, quite often they are successful only after being picked up by a bigger publisher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Jackson if you&#8217;re nasty &#124; Moriah Jovan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-864119</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Jackson if you&#8217;re nasty &#124; Moriah Jovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-864119</guid>
		<description>[...] (I know I read it the other day and I&#8217;ll address that in a future post), I found this gem: Top Ten Self-Publishing Myths. It&#8217;s all relevant to me, but I&#8217;m not going to post it all here. Copyright, you know. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (I know I read it the other day and I&#8217;ll address that in a future post), I found this gem: Top Ten Self-Publishing Myths. It&#8217;s all relevant to me, but I&#8217;m not going to post it all here. Copyright, you know. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-861263</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-861263</guid>
		<description>April,

Thank you.  I feel like crying.  My wife and I have written twenty children&#039;s books.  We sent them to an agent four weeks ago.  She said that if we don&#039;t here from her for eight weeks, then she&#039;s not interested.  We&#039;ve been wringing our hands for a month now.  The thing is, not to sound cocky, these stories are fantastic.  They&#039;re all done in rhythm, rhyme, and repetition, with an unforgiving vocabulary.  We run a preschool and read them to children all day long.  Even without the pictures, they are often the preferred stories.  They&#039;re not really like anything else in the bookstore.  Which we know might be the problem.  Today,  we thought, why not just contact an artist and get some help with the illustrations.  So I went online to research self-publishing.  After an hour, I found your site.  Thank you so much, your words meant a lot to me today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April,</p>
<p>Thank you.  I feel like crying.  My wife and I have written twenty children&#8217;s books.  We sent them to an agent four weeks ago.  She said that if we don&#8217;t here from her for eight weeks, then she&#8217;s not interested.  We&#8217;ve been wringing our hands for a month now.  The thing is, not to sound cocky, these stories are fantastic.  They&#8217;re all done in rhythm, rhyme, and repetition, with an unforgiving vocabulary.  We run a preschool and read them to children all day long.  Even without the pictures, they are often the preferred stories.  They&#8217;re not really like anything else in the bookstore.  Which we know might be the problem.  Today,  we thought, why not just contact an artist and get some help with the illustrations.  So I went online to research self-publishing.  After an hour, I found your site.  Thank you so much, your words meant a lot to me today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Moriarty</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-848968</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Moriarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-848968</guid>
		<description>I just finished off a battle with testicular cancer where the chemotherapy absolutely kicked my butt for a few months. Having worked as a reporter for a smalltown daily newspaper in Central Massachusetts, I provided myself with a little mental therapy throughout the battle by writing a column about the experience. The column was quite popular and a few people told me I should write a book about everything.
I&#039;ve had family and friends tell me for the last few years that I should write some sort of book and I decided, &quot;Eh, what the hell!&quot;

I&#039;m about halfway through what I expect to write (although we&#039;ll see where the pen takes me) and just started looking into self-publishing and what it involves. This page was certainly beneficial. Thank you very much for the insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished off a battle with testicular cancer where the chemotherapy absolutely kicked my butt for a few months. Having worked as a reporter for a smalltown daily newspaper in Central Massachusetts, I provided myself with a little mental therapy throughout the battle by writing a column about the experience. The column was quite popular and a few people told me I should write a book about everything.<br />
I&#8217;ve had family and friends tell me for the last few years that I should write some sort of book and I decided, &#8220;Eh, what the hell!&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m about halfway through what I expect to write (although we&#8217;ll see where the pen takes me) and just started looking into self-publishing and what it involves. This page was certainly beneficial. Thank you very much for the insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaden @ Screenwriting for Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-844291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaden @ Screenwriting for Hollywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-844291</guid>
		<description>Excellent post. From what I know, I agree. 

I do hope that novels become like music today, where the public can find what they like online (self-published novels included) and not just be sold the mainstream push.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post. From what I know, I agree. </p>
<p>I do hope that novels become like music today, where the public can find what they like online (self-published novels included) and not just be sold the mainstream push.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob land</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/06/26/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/comment-page-1/#comment-837361</link>
		<dc:creator>bob land</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 05:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/06/18/top-ten-self-publishing-myths/#comment-837361</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the good information you are posting about self-publishing. As a professional in the publishing business (copyediting, proofreading, indexing) with almost 30 years of experience, I can say that the world of self-publishing has made great strides in even just the last few years. With the proper vendors (everything from cover design to editing) -- or even without, as you point out -- there is nothing that keeps a self-publisher from putting out a product that looks even better than those of the biggest publishing houses in the world, for whom quality seems to be lagging more and more each day. Many self-publishers in the realm of nonfiction forget about indexes, when really thereâ€™s little more than can add value to (or detract value from) a nonfiction book. Iâ€™ve worked on quite a few indexes for indie authors as well as major presses, and if youâ€™d like to know more (or about copyediting or proofreading in the publishing industry), please visit my own blog: boblandedits.blogspot.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the good information you are posting about self-publishing. As a professional in the publishing business (copyediting, proofreading, indexing) with almost 30 years of experience, I can say that the world of self-publishing has made great strides in even just the last few years. With the proper vendors (everything from cover design to editing) &#8212; or even without, as you point out &#8212; there is nothing that keeps a self-publisher from putting out a product that looks even better than those of the biggest publishing houses in the world, for whom quality seems to be lagging more and more each day. Many self-publishers in the realm of nonfiction forget about indexes, when really thereâ€™s little more than can add value to (or detract value from) a nonfiction book. Iâ€™ve worked on quite a few indexes for indie authors as well as major presses, and if youâ€™d like to know more (or about copyediting or proofreading in the publishing industry), please visit my own blog: boblandedits.blogspot.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
