<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-books NOT a top app for iPhone&#8212;but they might still do well on the phone compared to other platforms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-878291</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/#comment-878291</guid>
		<description>Put it this way, Bill. If it isn&#039;t DRMed, I&#039;m flexible. I just wonder about treating books like apps. The real goal should be to make e-reader software and the rest easy enough so people can just guy the content files. As for Stanza, it&#039;s wonderful but is very much a work in progress, as Marc could be the first to admit. For a $0 program, we get a lot for our money ;-).  David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put it this way, Bill. If it isn&#8217;t DRMed, I&#8217;m flexible. I just wonder about treating books like apps. The real goal should be to make e-reader software and the rest easy enough so people can just guy the content files. As for Stanza, it&#8217;s wonderful but is very much a work in progress, as Marc could be the first to admit. For a $0 program, we get a lot for our money <img src='http://www.teleread.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Janssen</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-878011</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Janssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/#comment-878011</guid>
		<description>And there&#039;s a site packaging up lots of Project Gutenberg books as individual apps, at http://appengines.com/.  While I&#039;m happy with Stanza, I&#039;m guessing that the average consumer might like books packaged as individual apps better than buying it through a retailer app like FictionWise&#039;s eReader -- seems more like you &quot;own&quot; it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And there&#8217;s a site packaging up lots of Project Gutenberg books as individual apps, at <a href="http://appengines.com/" rel="nofollow">http://appengines.com/</a>.  While I&#8217;m happy with Stanza, I&#8217;m guessing that the average consumer might like books packaged as individual apps better than buying it through a retailer app like FictionWise&#8217;s eReader &#8212; seems more like you &#8220;own&#8221; it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-877638</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/#comment-877638</guid>
		<description>Hi, Jane. He could be talking about books in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zapptek.com/legends/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Legend format&lt;/a&gt;. - David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jane. He could be talking about books in the <a href="http://www.zapptek.com/legends/" rel="nofollow">Legend format</a>. &#8211; David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-877360</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/#comment-877360</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
But at least one author has indicated that his books are selling better for the iPhone than the Kindle.”
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s a curious statement because what books are specially formatted for the iPhone that have regular commercial appeal?  I.e., the books that are individual apps don&#039;t have a lot of commercial relevance, imo.  And the rest of the books that are frequently read on the iPhone, say via the ereader app, are ereader purchases, not special iPhone purchases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
But at least one author has indicated that his books are selling better for the iPhone than the Kindle.”
</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s a curious statement because what books are specially formatted for the iPhone that have regular commercial appeal?  I.e., the books that are individual apps don&#8217;t have a lot of commercial relevance, imo.  And the rest of the books that are frequently read on the iPhone, say via the ereader app, are ereader purchases, not special iPhone purchases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-877176</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/#comment-877176</guid>
		<description>&quot;Generally.&quot; That&#039;s the key word, Mike. As for eReader, just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/08/13/ereader-iphonetouch-app-after-a-month-on-130000-devices-with-35000-e-books-bought-for-that-platform/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;follow the link already given for info on the app&#039;s popularity&lt;/a&gt;. No dollars and cents figure. But it&#039;s obvious that the App Store has been good to eReader, and that this is just the start.

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Generally.&#8221; That&#8217;s the key word, Mike. As for eReader, just <a href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/08/13/ereader-iphonetouch-app-after-a-month-on-130000-devices-with-35000-e-books-bought-for-that-platform/" rel="nofollow">follow the link already given for info on the app&#8217;s popularity</a>. No dollars and cents figure. But it&#8217;s obvious that the App Store has been good to eReader, and that this is just the start.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/comment-page-1/#comment-877151</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/08/15/e-books-not-a-top-app-for-iphone-but-they-might-still-do-well-on-the-phone-compared-to-other-platforms/#comment-877151</guid>
		<description>False issue.

1) The books are generally public domain.

2) No &quot;brand names.&quot;

3) How can anyone tell what new business eReader might have gotten from their iPhone app?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>False issue.</p>
<p>1) The books are generally public domain.</p>
<p>2) No &#8220;brand names.&#8221;</p>
<p>3) How can anyone tell what new business eReader might have gotten from their iPhone app?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
