<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tor&#8217;s e-book giveaway: Someone is WRONG on the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: spooky</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-884415</link>
		<dc:creator>spooky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-884415</guid>
		<description>Point made.  I started to post this (different words then) several HOURS ago and did a bit of research to make sure I wasn&#039;t wrong and then just got back and realized...

Someone is WRONG on the internet.

Yeah--point made big time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point made.  I started to post this (different words then) several HOURS ago and did a bit of research to make sure I wasn&#8217;t wrong and then just got back and realized&#8230;</p>
<p>Someone is WRONG on the internet.</p>
<p>Yeah&#8211;point made big time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMcCunney</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-882600</link>
		<dc:creator>DMcCunney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-882600</guid>
		<description>@MoJo
&lt;i&gt;I read you to mean that it was difficult and expensive, and that was THE major stumbling block for major publishers to get on board.&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;Difficult and expensive&quot; are also relative.  Agreed, InDesign is a sunk cost.  Most outfits of any size already have it (or Quark eXpress, but my impression is that Quark shops are moving to Indesign), so it&#039;s already a part of the work flow.

The pieces that aren&#039;t in place are the conversion routines to take an ePub file and turn it into a different ebook format, and the automation to turn the process into a pipeline, so it all happens automatically once the ePub file exists.  

That will take some doing, and have costs.  The software that does it may be free, but the time and expertise of those doing it is not.  It will be a fairly significant development effort with attendant costs, and not without political obstacles in larger organizations.

But I hardly think it&#039;s the biggest and most important roadblock to ebooks.  I&#039;d call that simply recognizing that there &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a market for ebooks, with money to be made in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MoJo<br />
<i>I read you to mean that it was difficult and expensive, and that was THE major stumbling block for major publishers to get on board.</i></p>
<p>&#8220;Difficult and expensive&#8221; are also relative.  Agreed, InDesign is a sunk cost.  Most outfits of any size already have it (or Quark eXpress, but my impression is that Quark shops are moving to Indesign), so it&#8217;s already a part of the work flow.</p>
<p>The pieces that aren&#8217;t in place are the conversion routines to take an ePub file and turn it into a different ebook format, and the automation to turn the process into a pipeline, so it all happens automatically once the ePub file exists.  </p>
<p>That will take some doing, and have costs.  The software that does it may be free, but the time and expertise of those doing it is not.  It will be a fairly significant development effort with attendant costs, and not without political obstacles in larger organizations.</p>
<p>But I hardly think it&#8217;s the biggest and most important roadblock to ebooks.  I&#8217;d call that simply recognizing that there <i>is</i> a market for ebooks, with money to be made in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoJo</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-882568</link>
		<dc:creator>MoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-882568</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;InDesign is neither free not dirt cheap, but if you’re a major publisher, that’s not a huge consideration, and it’s the major publishers that need to get on board.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

InDesign is a sunk cost for major (and some minor) publishers, so I was assuming that in my comment.  I do agree with you, though.

I read you to mean that it was difficult and expensive, and that was THE major stumbling block for major publishers to get on board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>InDesign is neither free not dirt cheap, but if you’re a major publisher, that’s not a huge consideration, and it’s the major publishers that need to get on board.</p></blockquote>
<p>InDesign is a sunk cost for major (and some minor) publishers, so I was assuming that in my comment.  I do agree with you, though.</p>
<p>I read you to mean that it was difficult and expensive, and that was THE major stumbling block for major publishers to get on board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newjerseybadger</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-882567</link>
		<dc:creator>newjerseybadger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-882567</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just stunned at the combination of savvy and naivete (sorry, don&#039;t know how to put the accents in the right places for that with ascii) displayed by Tor.  
*  Give away free books to hook people on new Tor authors, check.  
*  Generate huge wave of publicity, check.  
*  Be ready to receive money and distribute product when publicity and interest causes wallets to open.... oops.

This is a huge lost opportunity for Tor. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s an exaggeration to say that potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars of sales (with minimal fixed and practically no unit costs to reduce revenue) are involved.  I hope they get their act together.

I became a Baen Webscriptions fan by browsing the Samples (1/4 of each book) they post online, and making my buying decisions based on that.  I&#039;ve read most of the Free Library and I now buy several more authors because of that (and the Baen Webscriptions).

It&#039;s gotten so that I hardly buy fiction from unknowns anywhere else, just because I can&#039;t determine whether I like someone new without at least a sample of his work.  I&#039;d like to have the chance to do the same with Tor; I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a lot more good fic waiting to be read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just stunned at the combination of savvy and naivete (sorry, don&#8217;t know how to put the accents in the right places for that with ascii) displayed by Tor.<br />
*  Give away free books to hook people on new Tor authors, check.<br />
*  Generate huge wave of publicity, check.<br />
*  Be ready to receive money and distribute product when publicity and interest causes wallets to open&#8230;. oops.</p>
<p>This is a huge lost opportunity for Tor. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s an exaggeration to say that potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars of sales (with minimal fixed and practically no unit costs to reduce revenue) are involved.  I hope they get their act together.</p>
<p>I became a Baen Webscriptions fan by browsing the Samples (1/4 of each book) they post online, and making my buying decisions based on that.  I&#8217;ve read most of the Free Library and I now buy several more authors because of that (and the Baen Webscriptions).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s gotten so that I hardly buy fiction from unknowns anywhere else, just because I can&#8217;t determine whether I like someone new without at least a sample of his work.  I&#8217;d like to have the chance to do the same with Tor; I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a lot more good fic waiting to be read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links of Interest (July 18th 2008 through August 21st 2008) &#124; All the Billion Other Moments (Jason Penney)</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-882382</link>
		<dc:creator>Links of Interest (July 18th 2008 through August 21st 2008) &#124; All the Billion Other Moments (Jason Penney)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-882382</guid>
		<description>[...] of Interest (July 18th 2008 Through August 21st 2008)  Tor&#8217;s e-book giveaway: Someone is WRONG on the InternetTor books recencly gave away a batch of free e-books as publicity for the new Tor.com. Many of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Interest (July 18th 2008 Through August 21st 2008)  Tor&#8217;s e-book giveaway: Someone is WRONG on the InternetTor books recencly gave away a batch of free e-books as publicity for the new Tor.com. Many of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMcCunney</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-882215</link>
		<dc:creator>DMcCunney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-882215</guid>
		<description>@Moriah Jovan
Poke around a bit on MobileRead and you&#039;ll find me, and discover I have some acquaintance with the technology and the issues. I also have a fair bit of the software required installed here. &quot;It&#039;s not hard&quot; is relative.

My vision of the future uses ePub as the intermediate format, as ePub is a format that can be created with InDesign, and many publishers use InDesign to do the markup and typesetting, generating the PDFs that that will go the printer&#039;s prepress department and be fed to imagesetters to make plates.

ePub isn&#039;t widely supported on devices the reader will use yet, but it contains all of the elements needed, so you should be able to take an ePub file and convert it to MobiPocket, Sony LRF, eReader or whatever other format the end user&#039;s device &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; support.  And more important, it should be possible to &lt;i&gt;automate&lt;/i&gt; that process, so that once the ePub file is created, the rest can happen untouched by human hands.

InDesign is neither free not dirt cheap, but if you&#039;re a major publisher, that&#039;s not a huge consideration, and it&#039;s the major publishers that need to get on board.  Anything that can make the production of ebooks an automatic part of the process will be a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Moriah Jovan<br />
Poke around a bit on MobileRead and you&#8217;ll find me, and discover I have some acquaintance with the technology and the issues. I also have a fair bit of the software required installed here. &#8220;It&#8217;s not hard&#8221; is relative.</p>
<p>My vision of the future uses ePub as the intermediate format, as ePub is a format that can be created with InDesign, and many publishers use InDesign to do the markup and typesetting, generating the PDFs that that will go the printer&#8217;s prepress department and be fed to imagesetters to make plates.</p>
<p>ePub isn&#8217;t widely supported on devices the reader will use yet, but it contains all of the elements needed, so you should be able to take an ePub file and convert it to MobiPocket, Sony LRF, eReader or whatever other format the end user&#8217;s device <i>does</i> support.  And more important, it should be possible to <i>automate</i> that process, so that once the ePub file is created, the rest can happen untouched by human hands.</p>
<p>InDesign is neither free not dirt cheap, but if you&#8217;re a major publisher, that&#8217;s not a huge consideration, and it&#8217;s the major publishers that need to get on board.  Anything that can make the production of ebooks an automatic part of the process will be a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moriah Jovan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-882196</link>
		<dc:creator>Moriah Jovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-882196</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Production of an ebook requires a step between either the Word -&gt; markup/typesetting or markup/typesetting -&gt; pre-press operations to generate properly formatted ebook files. That takes software and expertise to do it I suspect many publishers don’t have.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Trust me.  It&#039;s not hard and the software is dirt cheap, free, or already on the publisher&#039;s servers.  A wander through &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mobileread.com/forums/index.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the MobileRead forum&lt;/a&gt; will make that crystal clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Production of an ebook requires a step between either the Word -&gt; markup/typesetting or markup/typesetting -&gt; pre-press operations to generate properly formatted ebook files. That takes software and expertise to do it I suspect many publishers don’t have.</p></blockquote>
<p>Trust me.  It&#8217;s not hard and the software is dirt cheap, free, or already on the publisher&#8217;s servers.  A wander through <a href="http://www.mobileread.com/forums/index.php" rel="nofollow">the MobileRead forum</a> will make that crystal clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-881778</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-881778</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;writing lengthy defenestrations

Uh, what?!!?

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/defenestration</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;writing lengthy defenestrations</p>
<p>Uh, what?!!?</p>
<p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/defenestration" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/defenestration</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ficbot</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-881297</link>
		<dc:creator>ficbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-881297</guid>
		<description>I guess we have been spoiled, perhaps, by the indie authors who make it seem like it can&#039;t be THAT hard :) I mean, Cory Doctorow had an e-version of Little Brother available on his website the day after it was out, in print, in the stores (and I think it might even be a Tor book!) The availability of the download helped his sales (I myself read it for free and plan to purchase it in print as a gift for my own little brother, so mission accomplished). And authors like Ed Heldershot will sell you their whole library, for a small price, directly from his website (as well as DRM-free Fictionwise titles, at a slightly higher price). So perhaps readers feel, rightly or wrongly, that it can&#039;t be THAT hard, so why won&#039;t they do it? If it were me, I know how hard it is to find an audience in this day and age, and I would be making my stuff available in every format under the sun. If the Japanese reader with some obscure device I have never heard of was interested enough in my book, I would email him an ASCII text file myself. So why do publishers make it so DIFFICULT for people who actually WANT to read the books? Shouldn&#039;t they be giving them every help in the world? I mean, how hard IS it? And if it really is that hard, why do indie authors seem to get it done just fine? I think the publishers need to just stop over-thinking things and move with the modern times here. They are so worried about piracy (which imho is a problem much blown out of proportion, especially as far as ebooks go) and more about finding readers in the first place and getting books into their hands in whichever format the reader prefers. And yeah, a standard would be nice. I suspect, personally, that it&#039;ll be iphone, Palm or Kindle who wins that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we have been spoiled, perhaps, by the indie authors who make it seem like it can&#8217;t be THAT hard <img src='http://www.teleread.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I mean, Cory Doctorow had an e-version of Little Brother available on his website the day after it was out, in print, in the stores (and I think it might even be a Tor book!) The availability of the download helped his sales (I myself read it for free and plan to purchase it in print as a gift for my own little brother, so mission accomplished). And authors like Ed Heldershot will sell you their whole library, for a small price, directly from his website (as well as DRM-free Fictionwise titles, at a slightly higher price). So perhaps readers feel, rightly or wrongly, that it can&#8217;t be THAT hard, so why won&#8217;t they do it? If it were me, I know how hard it is to find an audience in this day and age, and I would be making my stuff available in every format under the sun. If the Japanese reader with some obscure device I have never heard of was interested enough in my book, I would email him an ASCII text file myself. So why do publishers make it so DIFFICULT for people who actually WANT to read the books? Shouldn&#8217;t they be giving them every help in the world? I mean, how hard IS it? And if it really is that hard, why do indie authors seem to get it done just fine? I think the publishers need to just stop over-thinking things and move with the modern times here. They are so worried about piracy (which imho is a problem much blown out of proportion, especially as far as ebooks go) and more about finding readers in the first place and getting books into their hands in whichever format the reader prefers. And yeah, a standard would be nice. I suspect, personally, that it&#8217;ll be iphone, Palm or Kindle who wins that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick B</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-881279</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-881279</guid>
		<description>Well, my 0.02$, the free ebooks were a very good marketing ploy.  They would have been a better marketing ploy if the lawyers had been beaten into submission first, as I understand the &quot;technical problems&quot; have nothing to do with &quot;technology&quot; and everything to do with lawyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my 0.02$, the free ebooks were a very good marketing ploy.  They would have been a better marketing ploy if the lawyers had been beaten into submission first, as I understand the &#8220;technical problems&#8221; have nothing to do with &#8220;technology&#8221; and everything to do with lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMcCunney</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-881206</link>
		<dc:creator>DMcCunney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-881206</guid>
		<description>@Chris Meadows
&lt;i&gt;To be honest, I’m not sure they really do know now how many people want e-books only. I want e-books as much as the next guy, but I don’t think that the self-selected sample of people who post angry comments to a blog post can be taken as anything like representative of the audience as a whole.&lt;/i&gt;

I agree, and that&#039;s part of the problem.

Some years back, I attended a talk given by Beth Meachum, Tor&#039;s Editor In Chief, at a local SF fan group meeting.  One of the points Beth made was that SF fans were an important group, but &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; necessarily representative of the SF market.  If Tor published only the stuff folks in that group liked, they&#039;d go out of business.  So they did things like publish the latest Piers Anthony Xanth novel (&quot;Don&#039;t groan, people. That stuff &lt;i&gt;sells!&lt;/i&gt;&quot;) because they had the broader market to be concerned with.

And people need to remember that Tor doesn&#039;t just publish SF.  Tor is also responsible for the Forge imprint, which publishes a lot of other things.  Anybody care to take a guess at who Forge&#039;s readership is and where they stand on ebooks?  I wouldn&#039;t.

Frankly, I think the really vocal folks criticizing Tor are a tiny minority, and not necessarily representative of the broader ebook market.  I want ebooks as much as the next guy, too, but I&#039;m patient.  I&#039;m simply happy to see Tor recognizing that there &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; an ebook market and moving to address it. 

I&#039;m just curious about the &lt;i&gt;level&lt;/i&gt; of anger I see from some of the more vocal protesters.  If they get that upset over not immediately having the rest of a series available in electronic format, I wonder how they react to &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; important things, like potential threats to their life, health, or livelihood.

Meanwhile, I think Tor will &lt;i&gt;find out&lt;/i&gt; how many people want ebooks only, once they have more of their catalog available in ebook form, and offered for sale.  While we can probably assume that some folks might grab both editions, I think most will grab one or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris Meadows<br />
<i>To be honest, I’m not sure they really do know now how many people want e-books only. I want e-books as much as the next guy, but I don’t think that the self-selected sample of people who post angry comments to a blog post can be taken as anything like representative of the audience as a whole.</i></p>
<p>I agree, and that&#8217;s part of the problem.</p>
<p>Some years back, I attended a talk given by Beth Meachum, Tor&#8217;s Editor In Chief, at a local SF fan group meeting.  One of the points Beth made was that SF fans were an important group, but <i>not</i> necessarily representative of the SF market.  If Tor published only the stuff folks in that group liked, they&#8217;d go out of business.  So they did things like publish the latest Piers Anthony Xanth novel (&#8221;Don&#8217;t groan, people. That stuff <i>sells!</i>&#8220;) because they had the broader market to be concerned with.</p>
<p>And people need to remember that Tor doesn&#8217;t just publish SF.  Tor is also responsible for the Forge imprint, which publishes a lot of other things.  Anybody care to take a guess at who Forge&#8217;s readership is and where they stand on ebooks?  I wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Frankly, I think the really vocal folks criticizing Tor are a tiny minority, and not necessarily representative of the broader ebook market.  I want ebooks as much as the next guy, too, but I&#8217;m patient.  I&#8217;m simply happy to see Tor recognizing that there <i>is</i> an ebook market and moving to address it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just curious about the <i>level</i> of anger I see from some of the more vocal protesters.  If they get that upset over not immediately having the rest of a series available in electronic format, I wonder how they react to <i>really</i> important things, like potential threats to their life, health, or livelihood.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I think Tor will <i>find out</i> how many people want ebooks only, once they have more of their catalog available in ebook form, and offered for sale.  While we can probably assume that some folks might grab both editions, I think most will grab one or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-881176</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-881176</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I&#039;m not sure they really &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; know now how many people want e-books only. I want e-books as much as the next guy, but I don&#039;t think that the self-selected sample of people who post angry comments to a blog post can be taken as anything like representative of the audience as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I&#8217;m not sure they really <i>do</i> know now how many people want e-books only. I want e-books as much as the next guy, but I don&#8217;t think that the self-selected sample of people who post angry comments to a blog post can be taken as anything like representative of the audience as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMcCunney</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-881170</link>
		<dc:creator>DMcCunney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-881170</guid>
		<description>Oh, I agree with your feelings.  But see my comment to Chris previously, about the original purpose of the Baen Free Library.  Whether an author had works in the Library, and which and how many, was a matter of agreement between Baen and the author.  Some folks like David Weber cheerfully released &lt;i&gt;everything&lt;/i&gt; as a Library versions.  Others, like Elizabeth Moon, released one book, and if you wanted the rest of the series you had to buy it.  Back when the Library started, Baen didn&#039;t have its entire catalog available as ebooks, so if you wanted to buy other books, you bought the paper copies.

Tor is in part taking a leaf from Baen&#039;s book, and promoting their paper books as well as their website.  There are losts of folks delighted with what they have who have indicated intent to read other books by those authors, which was kind of the point.

And Tor recognizes there is a market for ebooks.  If they didn&#039;t, they wouldn&#039;t have tried to do the deal with Baen to offer Tor content through Webscriptions.

Yes, it would have made sense for Tor to have the other books in series where they gave away the first also available in ebook form, (though there&#039;s the question of how they would sell them,) and I think it was a tactical misstep on their part to not have done so.  But while I think Tor is aware there is a market for ebooks, I don&#039;t think they realized exactly how many highly vocal folks wanted &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; ebooks, and were enraged at the idea of being expected to buy paper volumes.

Well, they know now.  The next questions are how long it will take before they remedy the lack, and how they will sell them when they do.

I expect we will see those books in electronic editions in the not all that distant future.  I am not the only person who popped up on their new site and said they really needed to offer the other books as ebooks as well.  pnh stated that Macmillan was in the process of digitizing Tor&#039;s catalog and more would be forthcoming.

The next questions are when and how they will be made available. It&#039;s a good question.  Should Tor attempt to develop the capacity to sell direct to the mass market, or should they sell through established retailers like Amazon and Fictionwise?  Or should they restart their aborted deal with Baen and sell through Webscriptions? 

I assume we&#039;ll see, soon enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I agree with your feelings.  But see my comment to Chris previously, about the original purpose of the Baen Free Library.  Whether an author had works in the Library, and which and how many, was a matter of agreement between Baen and the author.  Some folks like David Weber cheerfully released <i>everything</i> as a Library versions.  Others, like Elizabeth Moon, released one book, and if you wanted the rest of the series you had to buy it.  Back when the Library started, Baen didn&#8217;t have its entire catalog available as ebooks, so if you wanted to buy other books, you bought the paper copies.</p>
<p>Tor is in part taking a leaf from Baen&#8217;s book, and promoting their paper books as well as their website.  There are losts of folks delighted with what they have who have indicated intent to read other books by those authors, which was kind of the point.</p>
<p>And Tor recognizes there is a market for ebooks.  If they didn&#8217;t, they wouldn&#8217;t have tried to do the deal with Baen to offer Tor content through Webscriptions.</p>
<p>Yes, it would have made sense for Tor to have the other books in series where they gave away the first also available in ebook form, (though there&#8217;s the question of how they would sell them,) and I think it was a tactical misstep on their part to not have done so.  But while I think Tor is aware there is a market for ebooks, I don&#8217;t think they realized exactly how many highly vocal folks wanted <i>only</i> ebooks, and were enraged at the idea of being expected to buy paper volumes.</p>
<p>Well, they know now.  The next questions are how long it will take before they remedy the lack, and how they will sell them when they do.</p>
<p>I expect we will see those books in electronic editions in the not all that distant future.  I am not the only person who popped up on their new site and said they really needed to offer the other books as ebooks as well.  pnh stated that Macmillan was in the process of digitizing Tor&#8217;s catalog and more would be forthcoming.</p>
<p>The next questions are when and how they will be made available. It&#8217;s a good question.  Should Tor attempt to develop the capacity to sell direct to the mass market, or should they sell through established retailers like Amazon and Fictionwise?  Or should they restart their aborted deal with Baen and sell through Webscriptions? </p>
<p>I assume we&#8217;ll see, soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ficbot</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-881125</link>
		<dc:creator>ficbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-881125</guid>
		<description>DM, you raise some very good points, some of which I had not thought of. I guess what continues to baffle me are examples like the Tor series books and the Pocket Books novel I mentioned. Clearly, they &#039;get it&#039; on some level, or they would not have offered book 1 of the series. Why, then, do they not offer book two as well? They lost a sale with me when I finished reading the e-book, went to look up book 2 and did not find it waiting for me. Instead I found a print copy at the public library---months later---and read it, for free, that way. Sale lost forever. Now, you might say that&#039;s only one book, one sale. But seriously, how many people would download book 1, read it, and then think to themselves &#039;now I must get myself to a bookstore so I can get my hands on a paper copy of book 2&#039; Does that make sense? And of course, there is the Harry Potter argument. Of course people aren&#039;t buying it. You aren&#039;t selling it, are you? So, how can they buy it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DM, you raise some very good points, some of which I had not thought of. I guess what continues to baffle me are examples like the Tor series books and the Pocket Books novel I mentioned. Clearly, they &#8216;get it&#8217; on some level, or they would not have offered book 1 of the series. Why, then, do they not offer book two as well? They lost a sale with me when I finished reading the e-book, went to look up book 2 and did not find it waiting for me. Instead I found a print copy at the public library&#8212;months later&#8212;and read it, for free, that way. Sale lost forever. Now, you might say that&#8217;s only one book, one sale. But seriously, how many people would download book 1, read it, and then think to themselves &#8216;now I must get myself to a bookstore so I can get my hands on a paper copy of book 2&#8242; Does that make sense? And of course, there is the Harry Potter argument. Of course people aren&#8217;t buying it. You aren&#8217;t selling it, are you? So, how can they buy it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMcCunney</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/08/19/tors_e-book_giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-881079</link>
		<dc:creator>DMcCunney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 22:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=11856#comment-881079</guid>
		<description>@ficbot
They may not care.  Or they may care in a different manner than you think.

A publisher may realize there is a market for ebooks, but realizing it and and addressing it are different matters.

First, electronic publishing is in many respects a different business model.  No one sensible changes their business model without clearly understanding they are doing so, and what the implications are.  You can assume some publishers are still groping toward a coherent digital strategy.

Second, before you can &lt;i&gt;sell&lt;/i&gt; ebooks, you must &lt;i&gt;produce&lt;/i&gt; them.  The current work flow is essentially Word document -&gt; markup/typesetting -&gt; pre-press operation to generate plates for printing -&gt; printing and binding of finished book.

Production of an ebook requires a step between either the Word -&gt; markup/typesetting or markup/typesetting -&gt; pre-press operations to generate properly formatted ebook files.  That takes software and expertise to do it I suspect many publishers don&#039;t have.

Third, you have the question of how you sell them.  Publishers traditionally have been manufacturers, selling to wholesalers and large retail chains, not directly to the reader.  Most of them aren&#039;t set up to do large scale direct to the reader sales.

This is where someone like Amazon can step in.  They already sell books, and lots of other things directly to consumers, and have the infrastructure in place.  In essence, they&#039;re a catalog retailer doing mail-order fulfillment.  They can take the heavy lifting of selling ebooks off the publisher&#039;s hands.

Fourth, most of the major publishers are owned by conglomerates with fingers in other media pies, like movies and music.  The corporate assumption will be &quot;Electronic content will be &lt;i&gt;pirated&lt;/i&gt;, and we must Take Measures to prevent it!&quot;, resulting in an assortment of DRM schemes, which are at best a PITA for the consumer.

Finally, you have the question of what the reader will use to display the ebook, and what format you you issue in.  Adobe PDF?  Mobipocket?  Sony LRF? eReader PML? ePub?  Failure to adopt a standard across the industry is an impediment to ebook adoption.  I want to download an ebook &lt;i&gt;once&lt;/i&gt;, and read it on whatever I happen to have handy, which might be a PC, Mac, PDA, smartphone, or Blackberry.  We are getting closer, but not there yet.

And even if all of the above are addressed, I think many publishers don&#039;t understand the number of ebook converts who will now &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; read an electronic edition, and refuse to buy a paper book.  Getting &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; across may take some doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ficbot<br />
They may not care.  Or they may care in a different manner than you think.</p>
<p>A publisher may realize there is a market for ebooks, but realizing it and and addressing it are different matters.</p>
<p>First, electronic publishing is in many respects a different business model.  No one sensible changes their business model without clearly understanding they are doing so, and what the implications are.  You can assume some publishers are still groping toward a coherent digital strategy.</p>
<p>Second, before you can <i>sell</i> ebooks, you must <i>produce</i> them.  The current work flow is essentially Word document -&gt; markup/typesetting -&gt; pre-press operation to generate plates for printing -&gt; printing and binding of finished book.</p>
<p>Production of an ebook requires a step between either the Word -&gt; markup/typesetting or markup/typesetting -&gt; pre-press operations to generate properly formatted ebook files.  That takes software and expertise to do it I suspect many publishers don&#8217;t have.</p>
<p>Third, you have the question of how you sell them.  Publishers traditionally have been manufacturers, selling to wholesalers and large retail chains, not directly to the reader.  Most of them aren&#8217;t set up to do large scale direct to the reader sales.</p>
<p>This is where someone like Amazon can step in.  They already sell books, and lots of other things directly to consumers, and have the infrastructure in place.  In essence, they&#8217;re a catalog retailer doing mail-order fulfillment.  They can take the heavy lifting of selling ebooks off the publisher&#8217;s hands.</p>
<p>Fourth, most of the major publishers are owned by conglomerates with fingers in other media pies, like movies and music.  The corporate assumption will be &#8220;Electronic content will be <i>pirated</i>, and we must Take Measures to prevent it!&#8221;, resulting in an assortment of DRM schemes, which are at best a PITA for the consumer.</p>
<p>Finally, you have the question of what the reader will use to display the ebook, and what format you you issue in.  Adobe PDF?  Mobipocket?  Sony LRF? eReader PML? ePub?  Failure to adopt a standard across the industry is an impediment to ebook adoption.  I want to download an ebook <i>once</i>, and read it on whatever I happen to have handy, which might be a PC, Mac, PDA, smartphone, or Blackberry.  We are getting closer, but not there yet.</p>
<p>And even if all of the above are addressed, I think many publishers don&#8217;t understand the number of ebook converts who will now <i>only</i> read an electronic edition, and refuse to buy a paper book.  Getting <i>that</i> across may take some doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
