<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minus Apple and Disney and others, a new DRM group starts up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/09/15/minus-apple-and-disney-and-others-a-new-drm-group-starts-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/09/15/minus-apple-and-disney-and-others-a-new-drm-group-starts-up/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Herley</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/09/15/minus-apple-and-disney-and-others-a-new-drm-group-starts-up/comment-page-1/#comment-906324</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Herley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/09/15/minus-apple-and-disney-and-others-a-new-drm-group-starts-up/#comment-906324</guid>
		<description>&quot; ... we’ll have a DRM-less world eventually.&quot;

I hope so, if only because it doesn&#039;t work! It penalizes the honest user and is easily circumvented by the pirates, so what&#039;s the point, other than providing a comforter to paranoid execs? This argument has been rehearsed so many times I&#039;m amazed that Jobs&#039;s viewpoint is not more widely shared.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; &#8230; we’ll have a DRM-less world eventually.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope so, if only because it doesn&#8217;t work! It penalizes the honest user and is easily circumvented by the pirates, so what&#8217;s the point, other than providing a comforter to paranoid execs? This argument has been rehearsed so many times I&#8217;m amazed that Jobs&#8217;s viewpoint is not more widely shared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Scott Andersen</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/09/15/minus-apple-and-disney-and-others-a-new-drm-group-starts-up/comment-page-1/#comment-906286</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Scott Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/09/15/minus-apple-and-disney-and-others-a-new-drm-group-starts-up/#comment-906286</guid>
		<description>Here is Steve Jobs&#039; view of DRM:

http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/

&quot;Why would the big four music companies agree to let Apple and others distribute their music without using DRM systems to protect it? The simplest answer is because DRMs haven’t worked, and may never work, to halt music piracy.&quot; 

and

&quot;So if the music companies are selling over 90 percent of their music DRM-free, what benefits do they get from selling the remaining small percentage of their music encumbered with a DRM system? There appear to be none. If anything, the technical expertise and overhead required to create, operate and update a DRM system has limited the number of participants selling DRM protected music. If such requirements were removed, the music industry might experience an influx of new companies willing to invest in innovative new stores and players. This can only be seen as a positive by the music companies.&quot;

There is evidence Apple &#039;gets it&#039;. There is also some evidence that Apple is working behind the scenes to free DRM from the music business. We can then hope the publishing business learns from this and comes to their senses quicker than their musical counterparts.

Unlike Disney, Apple does not own the copyright on the materials being distributed. Apple has to convince those copyright holders of the logic Jobs cites in message in order to for the world to change. 

Though many would like to place Apple on the &quot;naughty&quot; side of the naughty/nice list, I believe iTunes and the general movement towards electronic distribution of music may provide a proving ground for DRM-less content and ultimately help usher in a DRM-less marketplace for other materials such as books, magazines, and even games. It took a long time to get to this point. The next steps will not be easy. But, if CEOs ultimately succumb to the logic of this we&#039;ll have a DRM-less world eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is Steve Jobs&#8217; view of DRM:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Why would the big four music companies agree to let Apple and others distribute their music without using DRM systems to protect it? The simplest answer is because DRMs haven’t worked, and may never work, to halt music piracy.&#8221; </p>
<p>and</p>
<p>&#8220;So if the music companies are selling over 90 percent of their music DRM-free, what benefits do they get from selling the remaining small percentage of their music encumbered with a DRM system? There appear to be none. If anything, the technical expertise and overhead required to create, operate and update a DRM system has limited the number of participants selling DRM protected music. If such requirements were removed, the music industry might experience an influx of new companies willing to invest in innovative new stores and players. This can only be seen as a positive by the music companies.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is evidence Apple &#8216;gets it&#8217;. There is also some evidence that Apple is working behind the scenes to free DRM from the music business. We can then hope the publishing business learns from this and comes to their senses quicker than their musical counterparts.</p>
<p>Unlike Disney, Apple does not own the copyright on the materials being distributed. Apple has to convince those copyright holders of the logic Jobs cites in message in order to for the world to change. </p>
<p>Though many would like to place Apple on the &#8220;naughty&#8221; side of the naughty/nice list, I believe iTunes and the general movement towards electronic distribution of music may provide a proving ground for DRM-less content and ultimately help usher in a DRM-less marketplace for other materials such as books, magazines, and even games. It took a long time to get to this point. The next steps will not be easy. But, if CEOs ultimately succumb to the logic of this we&#8217;ll have a DRM-less world eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/09/15/minus-apple-and-disney-and-others-a-new-drm-group-starts-up/comment-page-1/#comment-906233</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 18:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/09/15/minus-apple-and-disney-and-others-a-new-drm-group-starts-up/#comment-906233</guid>
		<description>They should have stuck &quot;Universal&quot; in the middle of the name.

Then at least it would acronym to DEUCE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have stuck &#8220;Universal&#8221; in the middle of the name.</p>
<p>Then at least it would acronym to DEUCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
