<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google doubles book-scan publisher partners, has no plans for e-book reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-931198</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/#comment-931198</guid>
		<description>HP also announced it was going to do a touchscreen phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HP also announced it was going to do a touchscreen phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garson O'Toole</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-931187</link>
		<dc:creator>Garson O'Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/#comment-931187</guid>
		<description>Richard Herley mentions Google&#039;s focus on software, and Robert Nagle brings up Android. Google may not itself build an e-book hardware device, but its library of scanned books and maybe its software could become important. The  author of the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobile-and-Wireless/INSIDE-MOBILE-Why-eBooks-and-eBook-Readers-Will-Eventually-Succeed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eWeek article&lt;/A&gt;, “Why Ebooks and Ebook Readers Will Eventually Succeed“ that was linked on this blog earlier thinks that Google Android will be important for e-books. He discusses the need for a “great (natural) user interface” and says:&lt;blockquote&gt;Apple doesn’t need to distribute a user’s manual for the iPhone. You just pick it up, turn it on and it works the way you expect it to work. That’s the kind of UI that will be in our future eBook readers. Could it be based on the Apple iPhone operating system? Sure. But, most likely, it will be more of an open standard. And if I were betting, it would more likely be based on Android than the iPhone.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Of course the iPhone and iPod Touch can support open e-book standards. For example, the Stanza application can read multiple formats including epub and html as well as proprietary standards Mobipocket and Microsoft LIT (without DRM).

I think that the full success of cell phones as e-book readers hinges on larger displays. In fact multi-screen displays with concealed hinges would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Herley mentions Google&#8217;s focus on software, and Robert Nagle brings up Android. Google may not itself build an e-book hardware device, but its library of scanned books and maybe its software could become important. The  author of the <a HREF="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobile-and-Wireless/INSIDE-MOBILE-Why-eBooks-and-eBook-Readers-Will-Eventually-Succeed/" rel="nofollow">eWeek article</a>, “Why Ebooks and Ebook Readers Will Eventually Succeed“ that was linked on this blog earlier thinks that Google Android will be important for e-books. He discusses the need for a “great (natural) user interface” and says:<br />
<blockquote>Apple doesn’t need to distribute a user’s manual for the iPhone. You just pick it up, turn it on and it works the way you expect it to work. That’s the kind of UI that will be in our future eBook readers. Could it be based on the Apple iPhone operating system? Sure. But, most likely, it will be more of an open standard. And if I were betting, it would more likely be based on Android than the iPhone.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course the iPhone and iPod Touch can support open e-book standards. For example, the Stanza application can read multiple formats including epub and html as well as proprietary standards Mobipocket and Microsoft LIT (without DRM).</p>
<p>I think that the full success of cell phones as e-book readers hinges on larger displays. In fact multi-screen displays with concealed hinges would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-931177</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/#comment-931177</guid>
		<description>In other news, Tmobile announces its new android phone. Time will tell if any reading software will appear for that platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other news, Tmobile announces its new android phone. Time will tell if any reading software will appear for that platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Herley</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-931159</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Herley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/#comment-931159</guid>
		<description>Rumours of an entry-level Google PC came to nothing, and everything they do seems focused on software rather than hardware. I&#039;d be very surprised if Google produced their own device, though you never can tell. At their present rate of expansion, &quot;Google Earth&quot; soon won&#039;t just refer to their mapping service, but to the planet itself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumours of an entry-level Google PC came to nothing, and everything they do seems focused on software rather than hardware. I&#8217;d be very surprised if Google produced their own device, though you never can tell. At their present rate of expansion, &#8220;Google Earth&#8221; soon won&#8217;t just refer to their mapping service, but to the planet itself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Biba</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-931091</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Biba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/10/16/google-doubles-book-scan-publisher-partners-has-no-plans-for-e-book-reader/#comment-931091</guid>
		<description>Welcome back!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
