<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LCDs would be easier to read in the sunlight if this new breakthrough works out: E Ink alternative, too, eventually?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:36:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Sundman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/comment-page-1/#comment-966066</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Sundman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/#comment-966066</guid>
		<description>Well, mW sounds more like it. Normal transflective LCDs consume 1-2 mW/(cm*cm) (which means this new display would be 10 times as efficient, not 100 times, as the article claims).
With this new display an A4 (630 cm*cm) would consume 100-130 mW, so if you drive this (5V?) display with 4 AAA batteries storing 800 mAh you have almost 4000 mWh (4*1.2V*800mAh), which translates to 30-40 hours. Hmm.. shouldn&#039;t it be more, considering I used to have these small LCD pocket games that ran with tiny batteries for months? What am I missing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, mW sounds more like it. Normal transflective LCDs consume 1-2 mW/(cm*cm) (which means this new display would be 10 times as efficient, not 100 times, as the article claims).<br />
With this new display an A4 (630 cm*cm) would consume 100-130 mW, so if you drive this (5V?) display with 4 AAA batteries storing 800 mAh you have almost 4000 mWh (4*1.2V*800mAh), which translates to 30-40 hours. Hmm.. shouldn&#8217;t it be more, considering I used to have these small LCD pocket games that ran with tiny batteries for months? What am I missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/comment-page-1/#comment-966046</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/#comment-966046</guid>
		<description>LOL. &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milliwatt#Milliwatt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mW&lt;/a&gt;, perhaps? Small m? &lt;em&gt;Milli&lt;/em&gt;watts? Good catch, Marcus, thanks. I&#039;ve fixed the item. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milliwatt#Milliwatt" rel="nofollow">mW</a>, perhaps? Small m? <em>Milli</em>watts? Good catch, Marcus, thanks. I&#8217;ve fixed the item. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Sundman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/comment-page-1/#comment-965975</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Sundman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/#comment-965975</guid>
		<description>I guess we&#039;ll have to wait for official spec sheets before we can say anything about the downsides of this particular technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we&#8217;ll have to wait for official spec sheets before we can say anything about the downsides of this particular technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Sundman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/comment-page-1/#comment-965971</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Sundman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/#comment-965971</guid>
		<description>0.16MW, or 160kW, or 160,000W, is insanely much energy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0.16MW, or 160kW, or 160,000W, is insanely much energy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real BillC</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/comment-page-1/#comment-965689</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real BillC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/11/19/lcds-would-be-easier-to-read-in-the-sunlight-if-this-new-breakthrough-works-out-e-ink-alternative-too-eventually/#comment-965689</guid>
		<description>Wake me when he has a prototype device, pricing &amp; software. By next Summer the playing field should be even more crowded than it is now. Plastic Logic and Astak should both have touch screen offerings out and the 9 inch e-ink devices will go on sale. It&#039;s going to be an interesting year for display technology. Will this be anything more than an also ran...who knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake me when he has a prototype device, pricing &amp; software. By next Summer the playing field should be even more crowded than it is now. Plastic Logic and Astak should both have touch screen offerings out and the 9 inch e-ink devices will go on sale. It&#8217;s going to be an interesting year for display technology. Will this be anything more than an also ran&#8230;who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
