<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone reading: pro and con views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/06/iphone-reading-pro-and-con-views/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/06/iphone-reading-pro-and-con-views/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:05:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary Frost</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/06/iphone-reading-pro-and-con-views/comment-page-1/#comment-998475</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2009/01/06/iphone-reading-pro-and-con-views/#comment-998475</guid>
		<description>With a paper book the reader is the interface. This economy of navigation has a number of attributes and legibility is one of them. To begin there is nothing more illegible than a black screen. This level of illegibility is disturbing as the reader must consider battery life, the instability of a life of e-reading and the uncertainties of navigation back for re-reading years later. Another economy of navigation is the two page spread in paper format; you don&#039;t need to change the view for every page. Also you can easily cross reference between various paper books.  Also the navigation is quicker in paper for transition between storage, selection, opening and delivery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a paper book the reader is the interface. This economy of navigation has a number of attributes and legibility is one of them. To begin there is nothing more illegible than a black screen. This level of illegibility is disturbing as the reader must consider battery life, the instability of a life of e-reading and the uncertainties of navigation back for re-reading years later. Another economy of navigation is the two page spread in paper format; you don&#8217;t need to change the view for every page. Also you can easily cross reference between various paper books.  Also the navigation is quicker in paper for transition between storage, selection, opening and delivery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Pollock</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/06/iphone-reading-pro-and-con-views/comment-page-1/#comment-998444</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Pollock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2009/01/06/iphone-reading-pro-and-con-views/#comment-998444</guid>
		<description>One argument for p-books instead of e-books is the publishers currently don&#039;t release new books in both formats on the same day.  So far I have watched several authors books be released and be available in all the &quot;big-box&quot; stores up to and including a week before it becomes available at Fictionwise.  In one case it was over a month before the e-book became available after the original publication release date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One argument for p-books instead of e-books is the publishers currently don&#8217;t release new books in both formats on the same day.  So far I have watched several authors books be released and be available in all the &#8220;big-box&#8221; stores up to and including a week before it becomes available at Fictionwise.  In one case it was over a month before the e-book became available after the original publication release date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
