<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-books and the cuddle myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:01:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-1007921</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/#comment-1007921</guid>
		<description>I &lt;i&gt;could&lt;/i&gt; read in the tub if I wanted to, thanks to the magic of the ziplock baggie + my iPod Touch.

But I generally take showers.

I must admit to having been rather surprised by the whole &quot;but I can&#039;t read it in the tub&quot; line of complaints. Not just because I&#039;d never even thought of reading in the tub before, but because their complaints are so counterintuitive.

Their line of reasoning seems to be that it&#039;s okay to read a print book but not an e-book in the tub, in case you drop it. But all the same, you&#039;ll end up getting water spots on your print book that way.

But if you read an e-book device inside a ziplock baggie, the danger from dropping it is vastly reduced and there are no water spots. Thus, an e-book device is &lt;i&gt;better&lt;/i&gt; for reading in the tub than a print book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <i>could</i> read in the tub if I wanted to, thanks to the magic of the ziplock baggie + my iPod Touch.</p>
<p>But I generally take showers.</p>
<p>I must admit to having been rather surprised by the whole &#8220;but I can&#8217;t read it in the tub&#8221; line of complaints. Not just because I&#8217;d never even thought of reading in the tub before, but because their complaints are so counterintuitive.</p>
<p>Their line of reasoning seems to be that it&#8217;s okay to read a print book but not an e-book in the tub, in case you drop it. But all the same, you&#8217;ll end up getting water spots on your print book that way.</p>
<p>But if you read an e-book device inside a ziplock baggie, the danger from dropping it is vastly reduced and there are no water spots. Thus, an e-book device is <i>better</i> for reading in the tub than a print book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen wester newton</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-1007712</link>
		<dc:creator>karen wester newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/#comment-1007712</guid>
		<description>I used to try to read in the bath tub, but book vs. e-reader aside, the water gets cold too fast to make it an issue. 

On the other hand, as far as reading while lying down goes, I find my Kindle easier to read than a print book.  I need bifocals and it&#039;s a pain to hold the book up to the correct place for the bifocals to kick in, but with Kindle I just make the font bigger and take off my glasses altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to try to read in the bath tub, but book vs. e-reader aside, the water gets cold too fast to make it an issue. </p>
<p>On the other hand, as far as reading while lying down goes, I find my Kindle easier to read than a print book.  I need bifocals and it&#8217;s a pain to hold the book up to the correct place for the bifocals to kick in, but with Kindle I just make the font bigger and take off my glasses altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoda47</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-1007702</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoda47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/#comment-1007702</guid>
		<description>Off the top of my head:

- Cuddling ruins paperback books. One good squeeze and the binding will never be the same.

- Why the bathtub comparison? Do people read in the tub? I try to keep my books far away from water. Best case scenario and even a drop can run the ink on a page (OK, so I buy cheap versions...), or if you drop the whole thing in it&#039;s done for. Sure, you&#039;re out more money losing the whole reading device, but why bring this argument up? Isn&#039;t this a bit like: &quot;Oh yeah, well, fire will ruin your Kindle!&quot; Both printed and eBooks are equally afraid of water (yeah, it&#039;s debatable if a dunking would really ruin a book reader, but...) so if you&#039;re a printed book lover who hates eBooks, why bring it up as if it&#039;s a fault of only eBook readers?

Also, I agree with Christo. My iPod Touch is MUCH nicer for reading in bed. Not only is the light out (so my wife can sleep while I read until the wee hours), but I can lay on my side and read without the binding getting in the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off the top of my head:</p>
<p>- Cuddling ruins paperback books. One good squeeze and the binding will never be the same.</p>
<p>- Why the bathtub comparison? Do people read in the tub? I try to keep my books far away from water. Best case scenario and even a drop can run the ink on a page (OK, so I buy cheap versions&#8230;), or if you drop the whole thing in it&#8217;s done for. Sure, you&#8217;re out more money losing the whole reading device, but why bring this argument up? Isn&#8217;t this a bit like: &#8220;Oh yeah, well, fire will ruin your Kindle!&#8221; Both printed and eBooks are equally afraid of water (yeah, it&#8217;s debatable if a dunking would really ruin a book reader, but&#8230;) so if you&#8217;re a printed book lover who hates eBooks, why bring it up as if it&#8217;s a fault of only eBook readers?</p>
<p>Also, I agree with Christo. My iPod Touch is MUCH nicer for reading in bed. Not only is the light out (so my wife can sleep while I read until the wee hours), but I can lay on my side and read without the binding getting in the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-1007679</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/#comment-1007679</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t own a Kindle, but I cuddle with my iPhone all the time! :-)

Seriously, I think this cuddle myth is more of an excuse than anything for some people who, for whatever reason, don&#039;t want to embrace e-books.

I also agree with what Christo said, about the immersion argument. Last August I spent a good chunk of a plane ride reading an ebook on my iPhone and I totally lost track of time. Had they not told me to turn off all electronic devices, I probably would have read right through the landing!

Great post! Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t own a Kindle, but I cuddle with my iPhone all the time! <img src='http://www.teleread.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, I think this cuddle myth is more of an excuse than anything for some people who, for whatever reason, don&#8217;t want to embrace e-books.</p>
<p>I also agree with what Christo said, about the immersion argument. Last August I spent a good chunk of a plane ride reading an ebook on my iPhone and I totally lost track of time. Had they not told me to turn off all electronic devices, I probably would have read right through the landing!</p>
<p>Great post! Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christo</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-1007626</link>
		<dc:creator>Christo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/#comment-1007626</guid>
		<description>It is far easier to read in bed with the iPhone than with a real book, especially a heavy one. Most of these reviews start with the words &quot;I can&#039;t imagine&quot;, which means they have never tried it!

The same applies to the immersion argument - i.e. you can&#039;t possibly immerse yourself in an ebook because of screen size, frequent page turning etc. If the book is good enough the mode of delivery is usually irrelevant. The other day I managed to exit from the tube (subway) navigate 2 crowded concourses, swipe ticket over a ticket barrier and scale 2 escalators while reading my book in eReader on iPhone. When I looked up I was startled to discover that I was out of the tube station, as I had no recollection of any of those actions - they took place automatically. That seems pretty immersive to me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is far easier to read in bed with the iPhone than with a real book, especially a heavy one. Most of these reviews start with the words &#8220;I can&#8217;t imagine&#8221;, which means they have never tried it!</p>
<p>The same applies to the immersion argument &#8211; i.e. you can&#8217;t possibly immerse yourself in an ebook because of screen size, frequent page turning etc. If the book is good enough the mode of delivery is usually irrelevant. The other day I managed to exit from the tube (subway) navigate 2 crowded concourses, swipe ticket over a ticket barrier and scale 2 escalators while reading my book in eReader on iPhone. When I looked up I was startled to discover that I was out of the tube station, as I had no recollection of any of those actions &#8211; they took place automatically. That seems pretty immersive to me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-1007582</link>
		<dc:creator>Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/01/27/e-books-and-the-cuddle-myth/#comment-1007582</guid>
		<description>The Kindle is also great for reading while eating.  Easy to prop up without having to keep pages open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kindle is also great for reading while eating.  Easy to prop up without having to keep pages open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
