<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon&#8217;s Long Play</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/14/amazons-long-play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/14/amazons-long-play/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:19:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob stein</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/14/amazons-long-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1013594</link>
		<dc:creator>bob stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=16930#comment-1013594</guid>
		<description>thoughtful piece Aaron, thank you

b.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thoughtful piece Aaron, thank you</p>
<p>b.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamish MacEwan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/14/amazons-long-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1013578</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamish MacEwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=16930#comment-1013578</guid>
		<description>&gt; The free market doesn’t work so well for book publishing

Major understatement for an industry that spends as much time and energy braying that a State enforced monopoly (of ever increasing coverage, depth and duration) is absolutely necessary for their survival.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; The free market doesn’t work so well for book publishing</p>
<p>Major understatement for an industry that spends as much time and energy braying that a State enforced monopoly (of ever increasing coverage, depth and duration) is absolutely necessary for their survival.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle O'Hagan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/14/amazons-long-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1013557</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle O'Hagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=16930#comment-1013557</guid>
		<description>This post, and the comment above from Madison &quot;Girl Arsonist&quot; McGraw, are so interesting to me. I work in the custom publishing industry and it, too, is changing at blinding speed. Just five years ago, most of the custom content we produced for clients was &quot;print:&quot; magazines, newsletters, annual reports. Today, it is indeed a medium-agnostic world: content is content and it is delivered in the channel demanded by the reader (or user). It is as senseless to wax nostalgic about the death of independent bookstores as it is to bemoan the VCR player or the independent electronics stores that used to sell them. And there is good news, very good news, in the book publishing world: No longer does content need to be &quot;vetted&quot; by publishing houses in New York that may or may not have a clue about the author&#039;s intended audience. Today, an author can publish his or her own work (through companies like iUniverse or Lulu), and still get it sold on Amazon or BN.com, in order to reach his audience, even if that audience consists of only 100 people around the world. In other words, even the most niche content can find a reader! In the &quot;old&quot; publishing system, that scenario was not possible. Just as Detroit&#039;s auto manufacturers must change or die, so must the publishing world. And as always, each change will spawn fresh, new ideas from authors and booksellers that will make our world a more interesting place in which to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post, and the comment above from Madison &#8220;Girl Arsonist&#8221; McGraw, are so interesting to me. I work in the custom publishing industry and it, too, is changing at blinding speed. Just five years ago, most of the custom content we produced for clients was &#8220;print:&#8221; magazines, newsletters, annual reports. Today, it is indeed a medium-agnostic world: content is content and it is delivered in the channel demanded by the reader (or user). It is as senseless to wax nostalgic about the death of independent bookstores as it is to bemoan the VCR player or the independent electronics stores that used to sell them. And there is good news, very good news, in the book publishing world: No longer does content need to be &#8220;vetted&#8221; by publishing houses in New York that may or may not have a clue about the author&#8217;s intended audience. Today, an author can publish his or her own work (through companies like iUniverse or Lulu), and still get it sold on Amazon or BN.com, in order to reach his audience, even if that audience consists of only 100 people around the world. In other words, even the most niche content can find a reader! In the &#8220;old&#8221; publishing system, that scenario was not possible. Just as Detroit&#8217;s auto manufacturers must change or die, so must the publishing world. And as always, each change will spawn fresh, new ideas from authors and booksellers that will make our world a more interesting place in which to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron S. Miller, CTO of BookGlutton, a Web-based community of readers</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/14/amazons-long-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1013068</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron S. Miller, CTO of BookGlutton, a Web-based community of readers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=16930#comment-1013068</guid>
		<description>The free market doesn&#039;t work so well for book publishing, where the notion of quality still matters to (some) people more than brand loyalty. Take a look at Andre Schiffrin&#039;s &quot;The Business of Books&quot; sometime to see what I mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The free market doesn&#8217;t work so well for book publishing, where the notion of quality still matters to (some) people more than brand loyalty. Take a look at Andre Schiffrin&#8217;s &#8220;The Business of Books&#8221; sometime to see what I mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madison "Girl Arsonist" McGraw</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/14/amazons-long-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1012863</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison "Girl Arsonist" McGraw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=16930#comment-1012863</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really tired of attending the Independent Bookstores&#039; Pity Party. 
It&#039;s quite simple: change or die. Create and thrive or stick to what you know and beg for business. 
I love Amazon. I love, adore, and am devoted to my Kindle. 
Using my Kindle I read more than ever and I&#039;m buying more books; in the grocery store line, waiting for the train, on the train, and when I&#039;m stuck in traffic. 
It&#039;s not up to me (or you) to save Independent Book Stores. If they can&#039;t figure out a way to drive customers to their store and keep them coming back, then they don&#039;t deserve to be in business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really tired of attending the Independent Bookstores&#8217; Pity Party.<br />
It&#8217;s quite simple: change or die. Create and thrive or stick to what you know and beg for business.<br />
I love Amazon. I love, adore, and am devoted to my Kindle.<br />
Using my Kindle I read more than ever and I&#8217;m buying more books; in the grocery store line, waiting for the train, on the train, and when I&#8217;m stuck in traffic.<br />
It&#8217;s not up to me (or you) to save Independent Book Stores. If they can&#8217;t figure out a way to drive customers to their store and keep them coming back, then they don&#8217;t deserve to be in business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Adin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/14/amazons-long-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1012610</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Adin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=16930#comment-1012610</guid>
		<description>I make it a point not to buy from Amazon. I used to buy a lot of books through ABE Books, but that ended when Amazon bought them. The last thing I want to do is help Amazon be the last bookstore and publisher standing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I make it a point not to buy from Amazon. I used to buy a lot of books through ABE Books, but that ended when Amazon bought them. The last thing I want to do is help Amazon be the last bookstore and publisher standing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Frost</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/14/amazons-long-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1012567</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Frost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=16930#comment-1012567</guid>
		<description>I agree that Amazon has deliberately disguised Kindle as a book reader. The actual agenda is elsewhere as a connected fulfillment device. Here are three reasons: With Kindle as a book reader it projects Amazon as a Library without any of the educational mission or cultural commitment. It positions technical evolution of the hand-held reader in the challenging domain of book simulation just as the photocopier industry discovered. It disguises outright marketing to educated customers and keeps within the politically correct confines of literacy advocation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Amazon has deliberately disguised Kindle as a book reader. The actual agenda is elsewhere as a connected fulfillment device. Here are three reasons: With Kindle as a book reader it projects Amazon as a Library without any of the educational mission or cultural commitment. It positions technical evolution of the hand-held reader in the challenging domain of book simulation just as the photocopier industry discovered. It disguises outright marketing to educated customers and keeps within the politically correct confines of literacy advocation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
