<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Playboy archive preview: A gem&#8212;but better for gawkers than info-seekers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/03/21/free-playboy-archive-preview-a-gem-but-better-for-gawkers-than-info-seekers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/03/21/free-playboy-archive-preview-a-gem-but-better-for-gawkers-than-info-seekers/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:19:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/03/21/free-playboy-archive-preview-a-gem-but-better-for-gawkers-than-info-seekers/comment-page-1/#comment-1024452</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/03/21/free-playboy-archive-preview-a-gem-but-better-for-gawkers-than-info-seekers/#comment-1024452</guid>
		<description>This is a microsoft-backed project to get people to install silverlight.   They are scrambling to compete to with Adobe in this space, and they have a found a compelling content matter with which to wage their next battle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a microsoft-backed project to get people to install silverlight.   They are scrambling to compete to with Adobe in this space, and they have a found a compelling content matter with which to wage their next battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/03/21/free-playboy-archive-preview-a-gem-but-better-for-gawkers-than-info-seekers/comment-page-1/#comment-1024235</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/03/21/free-playboy-archive-preview-a-gem-but-better-for-gawkers-than-info-seekers/#comment-1024235</guid>
		<description>Requiring Flash for basic functionallity of a web site is stupid enough. If this site requires Silverlight (or any other Flash-type plugin), then the Playboy people are even more clueless.

Companies everywhere: If you must use these types of plugins, keep it limited to videos. Don&#039;t make your entire site dependent on it. HTML and CSS can do quite a lot of the fancy navigation and layout, and is supported in all modern browsers. Make your site too inaccessable to me (and others) and I won&#039;t use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Requiring Flash for basic functionallity of a web site is stupid enough. If this site requires Silverlight (or any other Flash-type plugin), then the Playboy people are even more clueless.</p>
<p>Companies everywhere: If you must use these types of plugins, keep it limited to videos. Don&#8217;t make your entire site dependent on it. HTML and CSS can do quite a lot of the fancy navigation and layout, and is supported in all modern browsers. Make your site too inaccessable to me (and others) and I won&#8217;t use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lo</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/03/21/free-playboy-archive-preview-a-gem-but-better-for-gawkers-than-info-seekers/comment-page-1/#comment-1024153</link>
		<dc:creator>lo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/03/21/free-playboy-archive-preview-a-gem-but-better-for-gawkers-than-info-seekers/#comment-1024153</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this site has a bad accessibility. When wieved in Windows.
But when viewed on linux, even if microsoft suggest installing novell s moonlight, it is impossible to go beyond the page suggesting silverlight.
So, there is NO accessibility for those running Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this site has a bad accessibility. When wieved in Windows.<br />
But when viewed on linux, even if microsoft suggest installing novell s moonlight, it is impossible to go beyond the page suggesting silverlight.<br />
So, there is NO accessibility for those running Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
