<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GalleyCat puts the case for galleys as ebooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/14/galleycat-puts-the-case-for-galleys-as-ebooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/14/galleycat-puts-the-case-for-galleys-as-ebooks/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:42:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/14/galleycat-puts-the-case-for-galleys-as-ebooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1038324</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=20390#comment-1038324</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;d give Gallycat the benefit of the doubt there and assume they just used the Kindle as an example. They did mention &quot;eReader&quot; generically also. Clearly sending out whichever reader supports the most formats would be best.

I do however think that there would be costs beyond the $400,000. It costs a fair bit to run servers that would distribute the eBooks. Still, a lot less than 1.5 mil.

I&#039;d guess no publisher wants to be the one who spends the 400k that saves all the other publishers 1.5 mil a year, not when all the reviewers will have eReaders they buy themselves in a couple of years anyway. It&#039;s about relative profit, not absolute profit :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;d give Gallycat the benefit of the doubt there and assume they just used the Kindle as an example. They did mention &#8220;eReader&#8221; generically also. Clearly sending out whichever reader supports the most formats would be best.</p>
<p>I do however think that there would be costs beyond the $400,000. It costs a fair bit to run servers that would distribute the eBooks. Still, a lot less than 1.5 mil.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d guess no publisher wants to be the one who spends the 400k that saves all the other publishers 1.5 mil a year, not when all the reviewers will have eReaders they buy themselves in a couple of years anyway. It&#8217;s about relative profit, not absolute profit <img src='http://www.teleread.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moriah Jovan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/14/galleycat-puts-the-case-for-galleys-as-ebooks/comment-page-1/#comment-1037833</link>
		<dc:creator>Moriah Jovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=20390#comment-1037833</guid>
		<description>Epic Fail. Amazon != EBOOKS. No mention of any other e-book reading device, particularly those which are less expensive *koffsonykoff*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epic Fail. Amazon != EBOOKS. No mention of any other e-book reading device, particularly those which are less expensive *koffsonykoff*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
