<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My visit to E Ink</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/19/my-visit-to-e-ink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/19/my-visit-to-e-ink/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:12:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Wikert</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/19/my-visit-to-e-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-1041118</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Wikert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=20593#comment-1041118</guid>
		<description>Vicki, as I&#039;ve said before, there&#039;s no reason there can&#039;t be two pricing levels for content.  One would be the higher-priced version without ads that we see today. The other would be a lower-priced version with ads.  Customers could choose, so you could pay more for ad-free and I can pay less and live with some ads.  What&#039;s the harm in offering this choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vicki, as I&#8217;ve said before, there&#8217;s no reason there can&#8217;t be two pricing levels for content.  One would be the higher-priced version without ads that we see today. The other would be a lower-priced version with ads.  Customers could choose, so you could pay more for ad-free and I can pay less and live with some ads.  What&#8217;s the harm in offering this choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garson O'Toole</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/19/my-visit-to-e-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-1040859</link>
		<dc:creator>Garson O'Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=20593#comment-1040859</guid>
		<description>Joe Wikert said “I’m here to tell you I’ve seen a color display and it was very attractive. The colors were a little washed out but the clarity was excellent.”

An April 17th article at Engadget discusses &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/17/bridgestones-13-inch-color-e-paper-display-handles-pen-input-h/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bridgestone&#039;s new 13-inch color e-paper display prototype that handles pen input&lt;/A&gt;. The unit is based on a technology identified as QR-LPD (Quick Response Liquid Powder Display). The article includes pictures and a video of the color display but the depiction is not flattering or well illuminated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Wikert said “I’m here to tell you I’ve seen a color display and it was very attractive. The colors were a little washed out but the clarity was excellent.”</p>
<p>An April 17th article at Engadget discusses <a HREF="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/17/bridgestones-13-inch-color-e-paper-display-handles-pen-input-h/" rel="nofollow">Bridgestone&#8217;s new 13-inch color e-paper display prototype that handles pen input</a>. The unit is based on a technology identified as QR-LPD (Quick Response Liquid Powder Display). The article includes pictures and a video of the color display but the depiction is not flattering or well illuminated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/19/my-visit-to-e-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-1040597</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=20593#comment-1040597</guid>
		<description>&gt;  I’d like to see Amazon enable ad support so that
&gt;  publishers/authors will have a new way to monetize
&gt;  their content.

Publishers and (some) authors will love it. Clearly it hasn&#039;t occured to him that ~readers~ won&#039;t love it.

He may not mind reading a book with a flashing animated ad on every page.  Me? Not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;  I’d like to see Amazon enable ad support so that<br />
&gt;  publishers/authors will have a new way to monetize<br />
&gt;  their content.</p>
<p>Publishers and (some) authors will love it. Clearly it hasn&#8217;t occured to him that ~readers~ won&#8217;t love it.</p>
<p>He may not mind reading a book with a flashing animated ad on every page.  Me? Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
