<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPUB as a path to visually rich books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:40:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1045487</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1045487</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;employed in resource-limited mobile devices

Well, hello, that&#039;s really a poor excuse.  What mobile device *isn&#039;t* resource-limited?

And listen, I use ADE on a frikkin *1.8GHz* desktop CPU and it&#039;s a horrible, rotten, full-of-friction experience.  What?  Now even *GHz*-level speeds are weak?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;employed in resource-limited mobile devices</p>
<p>Well, hello, that&#8217;s really a poor excuse.  What mobile device *isn&#8217;t* resource-limited?</p>
<p>And listen, I use ADE on a frikkin *1.8GHz* desktop CPU and it&#8217;s a horrible, rotten, full-of-friction experience.  What?  Now even *GHz*-level speeds are weak?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Udsen</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1045347</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Udsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1045347</guid>
		<description>What i mean with epub and adobe is mainly the drm part just about every epub ebook for comercial sale is packaged in adobe DRM(witch isnt an openstandard because that would declasify the DRM as effective copy prevention in the terms of the DMCA) the actual implenatation might at this point be acurately but ill bet anything that whatever quirks and bugs sneeks into adobe reader is going to set the standard for how epubs are made to a lot higher degree then the actual standard.

MS actually submitted every thing the changed in IE to the standard body and, you have a lot of examples of standards or standard addons that move though the motions of being certifed and never actually gain multi vendor support, theres a lot more to the practical world of compatability then getting the right stamps on your specifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What i mean with epub and adobe is mainly the drm part just about every epub ebook for comercial sale is packaged in adobe DRM(witch isnt an openstandard because that would declasify the DRM as effective copy prevention in the terms of the DMCA) the actual implenatation might at this point be acurately but ill bet anything that whatever quirks and bugs sneeks into adobe reader is going to set the standard for how epubs are made to a lot higher degree then the actual standard.</p>
<p>MS actually submitted every thing the changed in IE to the standard body and, you have a lot of examples of standards or standard addons that move though the motions of being certifed and never actually gain multi vendor support, theres a lot more to the practical world of compatability then getting the right stamps on your specifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1045081</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1045081</guid>
		<description>Daniel,

I agree that EPUB hasn&#039;t yet been implemented properly by many vendors (I exclude Adobe from this - more below). But one of the key points of EPUB is to provide a high degree of flexibility to implementors to render differently based on device constraints. I don&#039;t want to make excuses for a vendor that, say, doesn&#039;t handle the CSS cascade at all, but EPUB is about structured content not visual fidelity.  Since in some circumstances (read out loud) the rendition might not even be visual! I do agree we need more validation of content and implementation (after all Adobe developed and open sources the EPUB validator); but even with improved compliance in the future, trying to recreate what csszengarden did in EPUB would be to miss the point of what EPUB is all about. And anyway the CSS subset defined in EPUB is about entity-level styling, not geometric (page level) layout. As I said earlier in this comment thread: if you want to achieve a particular page layout, there&#039;s a perfectly good open standard for this: PDF, and all of Adobe&#039;s eBook solutions support both PDF and EPUB.

As far as EPUB not doing anything other formats don&#039;t do - the proprietary reflow-oriented eBook formats I&#039;m aware of do not support embedded font subsets, scalable vector graphics, or CSS styling. Most of them don&#039;t have structured table of contents support and other key features. If you are pessimistic about EPUB, then what eBook format(s) do you feel will succeed and why?

Re: the complexity of EPUB. Yeah, I wish it was simpler too.  A bit of this is historical - there were things about the preexisting OEBPS version that, in the opinion of most of the WG in the last cycle, made sense to retain for compatibility and this led to some overlap (e.g. between spine and TOC, between XHTML &amp; DTBook options). Yet, embedded fonts and SVG are inherently complex, Overall. I feel the complexity of EPUB is within what should be expected for an XML-based format delivering the functionality it has. 

As far as Adobe taking an &quot;embrace and redefine&quot; road, and not &quot;properly&quot; implementing EPUB,I think the facts speak for themselves. Adobe has been an active IDPF WG participant, and the compatibility of our rendering engine and authoring tools compare very well with other implementations. As I mentioned we ourselves initially developed the EPUB validator that is now an open source project being developed and used by many others. Adobe did implement two extensions to EPUB; these were done compatibly &amp; properly (e.g. not in IDPF namespace). They were extensions only because the IDPF WG had a full plate and chose not to expand its charter to work on them during the work that led to the most recent standard version in late 2007. IMO this was a sound decision since otherwise a delay would have resulted. One of these two extensions (obfuscating embedded font subsets) has already been adopted by IDPF via a tech note; the other (page-level templates, enabling things like headers &amp; footers) has been fully documented by Adobe and the subject of some IDPF WG discussion. Since AAP already urged IDPF to enhance the base EPUB standard in this area, I fully expect some mechanism for page templates to be adopted officially, and that Adobe will be compatible with it. 

Bottom line: if you honestly think Adobe has not properly implemented EPUB, please post or send me file(s) demonstrating this.  I&#039;m not saying we&#039;re perfect, and EPUB is still a relatively new standard, and thus so is our implementation. But to complain without any concrete examples is  just talking out of your hat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>I agree that EPUB hasn&#8217;t yet been implemented properly by many vendors (I exclude Adobe from this &#8211; more below). But one of the key points of EPUB is to provide a high degree of flexibility to implementors to render differently based on device constraints. I don&#8217;t want to make excuses for a vendor that, say, doesn&#8217;t handle the CSS cascade at all, but EPUB is about structured content not visual fidelity.  Since in some circumstances (read out loud) the rendition might not even be visual! I do agree we need more validation of content and implementation (after all Adobe developed and open sources the EPUB validator); but even with improved compliance in the future, trying to recreate what csszengarden did in EPUB would be to miss the point of what EPUB is all about. And anyway the CSS subset defined in EPUB is about entity-level styling, not geometric (page level) layout. As I said earlier in this comment thread: if you want to achieve a particular page layout, there&#8217;s a perfectly good open standard for this: PDF, and all of Adobe&#8217;s eBook solutions support both PDF and EPUB.</p>
<p>As far as EPUB not doing anything other formats don&#8217;t do &#8211; the proprietary reflow-oriented eBook formats I&#8217;m aware of do not support embedded font subsets, scalable vector graphics, or CSS styling. Most of them don&#8217;t have structured table of contents support and other key features. If you are pessimistic about EPUB, then what eBook format(s) do you feel will succeed and why?</p>
<p>Re: the complexity of EPUB. Yeah, I wish it was simpler too.  A bit of this is historical &#8211; there were things about the preexisting OEBPS version that, in the opinion of most of the WG in the last cycle, made sense to retain for compatibility and this led to some overlap (e.g. between spine and TOC, between XHTML &amp; DTBook options). Yet, embedded fonts and SVG are inherently complex, Overall. I feel the complexity of EPUB is within what should be expected for an XML-based format delivering the functionality it has. </p>
<p>As far as Adobe taking an &#8220;embrace and redefine&#8221; road, and not &#8220;properly&#8221; implementing EPUB,I think the facts speak for themselves. Adobe has been an active IDPF WG participant, and the compatibility of our rendering engine and authoring tools compare very well with other implementations. As I mentioned we ourselves initially developed the EPUB validator that is now an open source project being developed and used by many others. Adobe did implement two extensions to EPUB; these were done compatibly &amp; properly (e.g. not in IDPF namespace). They were extensions only because the IDPF WG had a full plate and chose not to expand its charter to work on them during the work that led to the most recent standard version in late 2007. IMO this was a sound decision since otherwise a delay would have resulted. One of these two extensions (obfuscating embedded font subsets) has already been adopted by IDPF via a tech note; the other (page-level templates, enabling things like headers &amp; footers) has been fully documented by Adobe and the subject of some IDPF WG discussion. Since AAP already urged IDPF to enhance the base EPUB standard in this area, I fully expect some mechanism for page templates to be adopted officially, and that Adobe will be compatible with it. </p>
<p>Bottom line: if you honestly think Adobe has not properly implemented EPUB, please post or send me file(s) demonstrating this.  I&#8217;m not saying we&#8217;re perfect, and EPUB is still a relatively new standard, and thus so is our implementation. But to complain without any concrete examples is  just talking out of your hat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Udsen</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1044382</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Udsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1044382</guid>
		<description>Epub supports just about anything but havent been implementet properly by anyone and probably wont, it&#039;s destined to live the death of ISO certified html and ECMAscript, it&#039;s too complicated it does nothing in it&#039;s domain existing formats dont do, the only established ebook player adobe is already so far down the embrace and redefine road that they cant really be said to support epub, and almost everyone else is relying on it being 110% compatible with xhtml.

In order to create what csszengarden did you would probably need your very own epub reader, since you got no chance of getting consistence witht the state the current readers are in if you actually try to do anything advanced with epub.

I still maintain that epub as anything but yet another export format automatic tools might support is a naive ivory tower project, atleast 10 year in the future and with the probablity that it can remain 10 years ahead of us for decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epub supports just about anything but havent been implementet properly by anyone and probably wont, it&#8217;s destined to live the death of ISO certified html and ECMAscript, it&#8217;s too complicated it does nothing in it&#8217;s domain existing formats dont do, the only established ebook player adobe is already so far down the embrace and redefine road that they cant really be said to support epub, and almost everyone else is relying on it being 110% compatible with xhtml.</p>
<p>In order to create what csszengarden did you would probably need your very own epub reader, since you got no chance of getting consistence witht the state the current readers are in if you actually try to do anything advanced with epub.</p>
<p>I still maintain that epub as anything but yet another export format automatic tools might support is a naive ivory tower project, atleast 10 year in the future and with the probablity that it can remain 10 years ahead of us for decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1044211</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1044211</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I&#039;m the first to admit that Adobe Digital Edition&#039;s underlying rendering engine will benefit from improvements in typographic capabilities. We are walking a fine line here since that engine also is employed in resource-limited mobile devices (Sony Reader etc.), but we certainly have lots of scope for improvement.

That being said EPUB is a reflow-centric format, designed to be used in situations where a particular typographic outcome is not the goal. The basic content types of EPUB (XHTML and DAISY DTBook) are not really designed for conveying such information. It is not entirely clear from your post what your expectations are. If they are primarily that Adobe Digital Editions should provide better table support, improved character set support, the option for hyphenation, etc. - well stay tuned. If your expectation is that you can use EPUB to achieve pages that look precisely the same as a printed version - I suggest you will be better off with PDF. We see EPUB complementing PDF, and of course Adobe DIgital Editions and compatible devices support both EPUB and PDF, so that&#039;s always an option if you require a high degree of print fidelity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m the first to admit that Adobe Digital Edition&#8217;s underlying rendering engine will benefit from improvements in typographic capabilities. We are walking a fine line here since that engine also is employed in resource-limited mobile devices (Sony Reader etc.), but we certainly have lots of scope for improvement.</p>
<p>That being said EPUB is a reflow-centric format, designed to be used in situations where a particular typographic outcome is not the goal. The basic content types of EPUB (XHTML and DAISY DTBook) are not really designed for conveying such information. It is not entirely clear from your post what your expectations are. If they are primarily that Adobe Digital Editions should provide better table support, improved character set support, the option for hyphenation, etc. &#8211; well stay tuned. If your expectation is that you can use EPUB to achieve pages that look precisely the same as a printed version &#8211; I suggest you will be better off with PDF. We see EPUB complementing PDF, and of course Adobe DIgital Editions and compatible devices support both EPUB and PDF, so that&#8217;s always an option if you require a high degree of print fidelity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1044203</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 06:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1044203</guid>
		<description>As Jon says, PDF publications are &quot;typeset at the factory&quot;.  My original post was primarily to point out that with SVG supported in EPUB, chunks of content within an EPUB publication can be, where appropriate, also &quot;typeset at the factory&quot; - including, yes, vertical text. EPUB even provides a mechanism so that pure-text alternatives can be provided for accessibility. 

Theoretically one could even make an EPUB comprised of a sequence of SVG page images. This would be a very close analog to PDF (Adobe has even proposed an XML serialization of PDF, &quot;Project Mars&quot; that uses SVG for the page descriptions). Of course since we already have PDF as a widely adopted ISO standard, there is no reason to perform unnatural acts with EPUB . I feel that SVG in EPUB should be used sparingly, and primarily for info graphics or other scenarios where a bitmap image would otherwise need to be employed. Anything that CAN be reflowable text in an EPUB, SHOULD be reflowable text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Jon says, PDF publications are &#8220;typeset at the factory&#8221;.  My original post was primarily to point out that with SVG supported in EPUB, chunks of content within an EPUB publication can be, where appropriate, also &#8220;typeset at the factory&#8221; &#8211; including, yes, vertical text. EPUB even provides a mechanism so that pure-text alternatives can be provided for accessibility. </p>
<p>Theoretically one could even make an EPUB comprised of a sequence of SVG page images. This would be a very close analog to PDF (Adobe has even proposed an XML serialization of PDF, &#8220;Project Mars&#8221; that uses SVG for the page descriptions). Of course since we already have PDF as a widely adopted ISO standard, there is no reason to perform unnatural acts with EPUB . I feel that SVG in EPUB should be used sparingly, and primarily for info graphics or other scenarios where a bitmap image would otherwise need to be employed. Anything that CAN be reflowable text in an EPUB, SHOULD be reflowable text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1043742</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1043742</guid>
		<description>Article:
Pretty hype pretty hype pretty hype pretty hype.

My clear view of the fugly reality:
http://ebooktest.blogspot.com/2009/04/is-adobe-hindering-ebooks.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Article:<br />
Pretty hype pretty hype pretty hype pretty hype.</p>
<p>My clear view of the fugly reality:<br />
<a href="http://ebooktest.blogspot.com/2009/04/is-adobe-hindering-ebooks.html" rel="nofollow">http://ebooktest.blogspot.com/2009/04/is-adobe-hindering-ebooks.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Fahlgren</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1043228</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Fahlgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1043228</guid>
		<description>Shame those Hindawi ePubs aren&#039;t valid...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shame those Hindawi ePubs aren&#8217;t valid&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Noring</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1043205</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Noring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1043205</guid>
		<description>Btw, I also prefer &#8220;ePub&#8221; over &#8220;EPUB&#8221; since ePub is not an acronym. I also believe as David does that ePub is visually better &#8212; and that EPUB is way too harsh.

One thing IDPF&#8217;s OEB Working Group should consider doing is to query a number of marketing experts about which case form is most appealing to consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, I also prefer &ldquo;ePub&rdquo; over &ldquo;EPUB&rdquo; since ePub is not an acronym. I also believe as David does that ePub is visually better &mdash; and that EPUB is way too harsh.</p>
<p>One thing IDPF&rsquo;s OEB Working Group should consider doing is to query a number of marketing experts about which case form is most appealing to consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Noring</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1043201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Noring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1043201</guid>
		<description>A different way to look at the PDF vs. reflowable format debate is that PDF is already &#8220;typeset at the factory&#8221;, where complex typographic layout (often including elaborate fine-tuning by hand) can be achieved. The downside to this, of course, is rigidity in that the final result cannot be reliably re-typeset (reflowed) to adapt to a wide range of end-user platforms and preferences. (Another way to look at this is that PDF is adaptable to a particular reading platform: a sheet of paper of a certain specified size.)

Reflowable ebook formats, on the other hand, are &#8220;typeset on the fly&#8221; on the end-user side to optimally adapt the presentation of the textual content to the particular reading platform &lt;strong&gt;and&lt;/strong&gt; end-user preferences. This comes at the cost of not being able to achieve the same very high level of typographic presentation quality possible to achieve with PDF.

ePub is presently the best reflowable e-book format in that it allows for the highest level of typographic presentation quality for textual content (and ePub&#8217;s ability to sufficiently handle textual content mixed with images and multimedia.) Note that I use the word &#8220;allows&#8221; &#8212; what one can achieve in typographically rendering ePub depends upon the capability of the reading system software and hardware, and the quality of the markup and CSS within the ePub publication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A different way to look at the PDF vs. reflowable format debate is that PDF is already &ldquo;typeset at the factory&rdquo;, where complex typographic layout (often including elaborate fine-tuning by hand) can be achieved. The downside to this, of course, is rigidity in that the final result cannot be reliably re-typeset (reflowed) to adapt to a wide range of end-user platforms and preferences. (Another way to look at this is that PDF is adaptable to a particular reading platform: a sheet of paper of a certain specified size.)</p>
<p>Reflowable ebook formats, on the other hand, are &ldquo;typeset on the fly&rdquo; on the end-user side to optimally adapt the presentation of the textual content to the particular reading platform <strong>and</strong> end-user preferences. This comes at the cost of not being able to achieve the same very high level of typographic presentation quality possible to achieve with PDF.</p>
<p>ePub is presently the best reflowable e-book format in that it allows for the highest level of typographic presentation quality for textual content (and ePub&rsquo;s ability to sufficiently handle textual content mixed with images and multimedia.) Note that I use the word &ldquo;allows&rdquo; &mdash; what one can achieve in typographically rendering ePub depends upon the capability of the reading system software and hardware, and the quality of the markup and CSS within the ePub publication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pastore</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1043188</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pastore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1043188</guid>
		<description>I agree with Joe that PDF is typographically superior to ePub. PDF will always be the first choice for the pre-press work for paper books, and for certain ebooks that are exceptionally complex.

But PDF is not a solution for the vast majority of ebooks, unless publishers want to create many different sizes of PDFs for many different devices and reading systems. 

Therefore: ePub was created. And I do agree with Bill that ePub -- in its current state -- is capable of producing &quot;visually rich books.&quot;

When CSS (and the &quot;Web standards&quot; movement) needed a boost, someone created a website called Zen Garden, http://www.csszengarden.com/
which showcases the capabilities of CSS.

What we need is a free repository of &quot;exemplary ePub ebooks&quot; where designers can display a variety of ePub ebooks that are efficiently and beautifully designed. 

And then the rest of us could study these examples, and improve our own ePub creations.

Michael Pastore
50 Benefits of Ebooks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Joe that PDF is typographically superior to ePub. PDF will always be the first choice for the pre-press work for paper books, and for certain ebooks that are exceptionally complex.</p>
<p>But PDF is not a solution for the vast majority of ebooks, unless publishers want to create many different sizes of PDFs for many different devices and reading systems. </p>
<p>Therefore: ePub was created. And I do agree with Bill that ePub &#8212; in its current state &#8212; is capable of producing &#8220;visually rich books.&#8221;</p>
<p>When CSS (and the &#8220;Web standards&#8221; movement) needed a boost, someone created a website called Zen Garden, <a href="http://www.csszengarden.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.csszengarden.com/</a><br />
which showcases the capabilities of CSS.</p>
<p>What we need is a free repository of &#8220;exemplary ePub ebooks&#8221; where designers can display a variety of ePub ebooks that are efficiently and beautifully designed. </p>
<p>And then the rest of us could study these examples, and improve our own ePub creations.</p>
<p>Michael Pastore<br />
50 Benefits of Ebooks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1043168</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/23/epub-as-a-path-to-visually-rich-books/#comment-1043168</guid>
		<description>Well, it is false to state that ePub can do whatever PDF can (or any hedge near such a claim). PDF has tags for footnotes, for example, that XHTML 1.1 does not and never will have. In practice, typography isn’t even going to be in the same ballpark on ePub – producers can’t even figure out that full justification doesn’t work.

I also defy you to produce vertical text in an ePub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it is false to state that ePub can do whatever PDF can (or any hedge near such a claim). PDF has tags for footnotes, for example, that XHTML 1.1 does not and never will have. In practice, typography isn’t even going to be in the same ballpark on ePub – producers can’t even figure out that full justification doesn’t work.</p>
<p>I also defy you to produce vertical text in an ePub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
