<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Party Line Department: For me, it&#8217;s ePub, darn it, and it&#8217;s the IDPF that needs to change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:28:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Schofield</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1057498</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 01:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/#comment-1057498</guid>
		<description>My apologies to Travis, to Australian ears it sounds like a classic male name, but now I see my error.

In the future I will try and stick to the cambridge rule and use a plural pronoun, unless I definately know someone&#039;s sex.

Problem is, of course, based on nothing but a name, I thought I did, so my vow will probably be inneffective.

Mark Twain (paraphrased)
&quot;It ain&#039;t what we don&#039;t know that is a problem, but what we do know, but ain&#039;t so.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies to Travis, to Australian ears it sounds like a classic male name, but now I see my error.</p>
<p>In the future I will try and stick to the cambridge rule and use a plural pronoun, unless I definately know someone&#8217;s sex.</p>
<p>Problem is, of course, based on nothing but a name, I thought I did, so my vow will probably be inneffective.</p>
<p>Mark Twain (paraphrased)<br />
&#8220;It ain&#8217;t what we don&#8217;t know that is a problem, but what we do know, but ain&#8217;t so.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1057276</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/#comment-1057276</guid>
		<description>I agree with Rob and Greg: Let&#039;s get an ePub logo first, then worry about how to designate it as DRM-free (a potential logo you can use with anything).

@Mike: So, okay, I wasn&#039;t being totally serious with my prospective names.  But the point still stands: Most electronic documents are known by a proper name, or the name of the primary app that creates them.  Proper names can also have the benefit of achieving universal use status (An Ethiopian, say, may or may not know what an acrobat is, but he knows what an Acrobat file does).  

E-mail is a name for a generic electronic mail document that is handled by many different applications.  It is closer to &quot;e-book&quot; than to &quot;ePub,&quot; which is a specific format of the generic &quot;e-book.&quot;

Harry ... EpuB

That leaves Kestral... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Rob and Greg: Let&#8217;s get an ePub logo first, then worry about how to designate it as DRM-free (a potential logo you can use with anything).</p>
<p>@Mike: So, okay, I wasn&#8217;t being totally serious with my prospective names.  But the point still stands: Most electronic documents are known by a proper name, or the name of the primary app that creates them.  Proper names can also have the benefit of achieving universal use status (An Ethiopian, say, may or may not know what an acrobat is, but he knows what an Acrobat file does).  </p>
<p>E-mail is a name for a generic electronic mail document that is handled by many different applications.  It is closer to &#8220;e-book&#8221; than to &#8220;ePub,&#8221; which is a specific format of the generic &#8220;e-book.&#8221;</p>
<p>Harry &#8230; EpuB</p>
<p>That leaves Kestral&#8230; <img src='http://www.teleread.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1057111</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/#comment-1057111</guid>
		<description>Greg and Mike...

G: Just to note that Travis is very much a she--and a valued TeleBlog contributor, not just a cofounder of BookGlutton.

M: In strictly technical writing, I can understand.

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg and Mike&#8230;</p>
<p>G: Just to note that Travis is very much a she&#8211;and a valued TeleBlog contributor, not just a cofounder of BookGlutton.</p>
<p>M: In strictly technical writing, I can understand.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrique Catarrunas</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1057098</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrique Catarrunas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/#comment-1057098</guid>
		<description>I was hoping for a simple approach like:

open ePUB: http://quizzzz.com.sapo.pt/epub_open.png
closed ePUB: http://quizzzz.com.sapo.pt/epub_closed.png

Would loose strength if used in Black and white, but the color difference should make them obvious to purchasers after a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping for a simple approach like:</p>
<p>open ePUB: <a href="http://quizzzz.com.sapo.pt/epub_open.png" rel="nofollow">http://quizzzz.com.sapo.pt/epub_open.png</a><br />
closed ePUB: <a href="http://quizzzz.com.sapo.pt/epub_closed.png" rel="nofollow">http://quizzzz.com.sapo.pt/epub_closed.png</a></p>
<p>Would loose strength if used in Black and white, but the color difference should make them obvious to purchasers after a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1057070</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/#comment-1057070</guid>
		<description>@Steve,

Errr. Let me see now;

Tom ... ePub
Dick ... EPUB
Fozzy ... epub
Cow Seeds ... ePUB

Now let&#039;s see;

Email

Okay, so both email and epub are made up words nobody worries about using email to describe...well, emails.

PDF

Hmmm, isn&#039;t PDF one of the most found document types on the web? And where&#039;s the &quot;name&quot; for that - Portable Document Format..!?!


@David

I am tending toward using EPUB when using it in a technical sense, ePub when perhaps writing an more generic article about this particular eBook format, and epub (sometimes &quot;.epub&quot;) when talking about the files themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve,</p>
<p>Errr. Let me see now;</p>
<p>Tom &#8230; ePub<br />
Dick &#8230; EPUB<br />
Fozzy &#8230; epub<br />
Cow Seeds &#8230; ePUB</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s see;</p>
<p>Email</p>
<p>Okay, so both email and epub are made up words nobody worries about using email to describe&#8230;well, emails.</p>
<p>PDF</p>
<p>Hmmm, isn&#8217;t PDF one of the most found document types on the web? And where&#8217;s the &#8220;name&#8221; for that &#8211; Portable Document Format..!?!</p>
<p>@David</p>
<p>I am tending toward using EPUB when using it in a technical sense, ePub when perhaps writing an more generic article about this particular eBook format, and epub (sometimes &#8220;.epub&#8221;) when talking about the files themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Schofield</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1056961</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Schofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 05:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/#comment-1056961</guid>
		<description>Rob Preece is right, I put my hand to trying to design a DRM-free logo without the word &quot;free&quot;, I didn&#039;t succeed in a pleasing result.

The other thing is it needs to be international, I tried a variety of simple open-lock logo and a crossed out DMR (which does not work - but perhaps DMR and an open-lock logo would work, I should try again).

I should mention that Travis Alber&#039;s Epub logo is wonderful. The best I have seen, and so good that when I tried my hand at designing another, it kept moving towards what he had already done -- a sure sign that it is a great design.

Alber&#039;s Epub logo should become official (if he will allow it -- it is great both in colour and b&amp;w).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob Preece is right, I put my hand to trying to design a DRM-free logo without the word &#8220;free&#8221;, I didn&#8217;t succeed in a pleasing result.</p>
<p>The other thing is it needs to be international, I tried a variety of simple open-lock logo and a crossed out DMR (which does not work &#8211; but perhaps DMR and an open-lock logo would work, I should try again).</p>
<p>I should mention that Travis Alber&#8217;s Epub logo is wonderful. The best I have seen, and so good that when I tried my hand at designing another, it kept moving towards what he had already done &#8212; a sure sign that it is a great design.</p>
<p>Alber&#8217;s Epub logo should become official (if he will allow it &#8212; it is great both in colour and b&amp;w).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1056797</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/#comment-1056797</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little concerned about a logo with the word Free as a key part of it. Sure, if you look closely you&#039;ll see the DRM-Free, but at a glance, I think many will focus on the &#039;free&#039; part and be disappointed when they&#039;re asked to pay. Just because we don&#039;t think DRM is an attractive solution to the problem of piracy doesn&#039;t mean we think authors and publishers don&#039;t deserve a chance to make a living.

Rob Preece
Publisher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little concerned about a logo with the word Free as a key part of it. Sure, if you look closely you&#8217;ll see the DRM-Free, but at a glance, I think many will focus on the &#8216;free&#8217; part and be disappointed when they&#8217;re asked to pay. Just because we don&#8217;t think DRM is an attractive solution to the problem of piracy doesn&#8217;t mean we think authors and publishers don&#8217;t deserve a chance to make a living.</p>
<p>Rob Preece<br />
Publisher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1056600</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/13/no-party-line-department-for-me-its-epub-darn-it-and-its-the-idpf-that-needs-to-change/#comment-1056600</guid>
		<description>Heck, if you want aesthetics, you want better PR, you should be pressuring IDPF to give the standard a NAME!  Other e-book formats, and for that matter, most other electronic document formats, are known by a name rather than an extension... Word... Acrobat... Mobipocket... Kindle... Sony... Palm... Photoshop... Excel... 

Why, oh, why, are we sticking with &quot;ePub&quot;?  Even &quot;Open Book&quot; is a better label than that!  So is:

Open Doc
Open Text
Universal Doc
Free Doc
Tom
Dick
Harry
Kestral
Fozzy
Gonzo
Horseradish
Cow Seeds...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck, if you want aesthetics, you want better PR, you should be pressuring IDPF to give the standard a NAME!  Other e-book formats, and for that matter, most other electronic document formats, are known by a name rather than an extension&#8230; Word&#8230; Acrobat&#8230; Mobipocket&#8230; Kindle&#8230; Sony&#8230; Palm&#8230; Photoshop&#8230; Excel&#8230; </p>
<p>Why, oh, why, are we sticking with &#8220;ePub&#8221;?  Even &#8220;Open Book&#8221; is a better label than that!  So is:</p>
<p>Open Doc<br />
Open Text<br />
Universal Doc<br />
Free Doc<br />
Tom<br />
Dick<br />
Harry<br />
Kestral<br />
Fozzy<br />
Gonzo<br />
Horseradish<br />
Cow Seeds&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
