TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home

News & views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics
May 21st, 2009

Lawrence Lessig reviews Mark Helprin’s ‘Digital Barbarism’

By Chris Meadows

Found via BoingBoing: In the Huffington Post, Lawrence Lessig reviews novelist Mark Helprin’s new non-fiction book, Digital Barbarism. Helprin posted an editorial in the New York Times in 2007, calling for perpetual copyright, and was roundly denounced by contributors to Lessig’s wiki. As Cory Doctorow writes on BoingBoing, “The essay was so ham-fisted and odd that a lot of people assumed that it was a joke,” and judging from Lessig’s review the book suffers from the same problem, only more so.

Lessig proceeds to demolish Digital Barbarism at great length, in terms of both argument and writing style. He points out that Helprin apparently did not research his book at all beyond reading blogs and the Internet, and makes a number of errors and fallacies that stem from this lack of research.

The review makes for interesting reading, especially if you have an interest in copyright term lengths.

Digg us. Slashdot us. Facebook us. Twitter us. Share the news.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Netvibes
  • Turn this article into a PDF!

2 Responses to “Lawrence Lessig reviews Mark Helprin’s ‘Digital Barbarism’”

  1. Thank you, Chris, for this link and your comments. Lessig’s long book review is captivating reading. It’s the most crushing critique I’ve read since Mark Twain’s hilarious essay: Fenimore Cooper’s Literary Offenses.

    Helprin and Lessig are just about at opposite ends of the argument about copyright laws.

    Here is an excerpt from Lessig’s review:

    Mark Helprin is an angry man. His book rages against the machine. It rages against modern education. (”[M]odern education promotes collectivism verses what it perceives as destructive, self-promoting individualism.” (53); “Intense ‘communitarianism’ is continued through elementary and secondary education, and then nailed firmly into the wood by experts, ideologues, and lunatics in the university.” (54)). It scorns collaboration. (”Collaboration, collective punishment, and group responsibility are now the watchwords of the classroom. As the chairman of the Oxford History Faculty Board, Christopher Haig, recently put it: ‘Historians used once to work alone, reading in archives and writing in college rooms. History is now a more collaborative exercise.’” (53)) It hates just about everyone it describes. It practices an arrogance that assures ignorance. It teaches absolutely nothing about the hard and important questions of copyright.

    It would be interesting to get these two authors together at the same time, in a live debate about this issue of copyrights.

  2. Interesting in the Chinese sense? :) Make sure there are no throwable objects in the vicinity? :)

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting