<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Newspapers Create Consortium for E-Readers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/24/should-newspapers-create-consortium-for-e-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/24/should-newspapers-create-consortium-for-e-readers/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:01:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: B. Scott Andersen</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/24/should-newspapers-create-consortium-for-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-1066212</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Scott Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22450#comment-1066212</guid>
		<description>Something here doesn&#039;t add up (or multiply correctly).
Average file size = 1.2MB
Month&#039;s worth (30) = 36MB
Bandwidth = .12 cents / MB (???)
Cost = $0.0432

If bandwidth is $0.12 (and not .12 cents)
then, yes, the monthly cost would be $4.32
for a 30 day month.

So, is the $4.32 correct, or is the .12 cents correct?

-- Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something here doesn&#8217;t add up (or multiply correctly).<br />
Average file size = 1.2MB<br />
Month&#8217;s worth (30) = 36MB<br />
Bandwidth = .12 cents / MB (???)<br />
Cost = $0.0432</p>
<p>If bandwidth is $0.12 (and not .12 cents)<br />
then, yes, the monthly cost would be $4.32<br />
for a 30 day month.</p>
<p>So, is the $4.32 correct, or is the .12 cents correct?</p>
<p>&#8211; Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/24/should-newspapers-create-consortium-for-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-1064845</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22450#comment-1064845</guid>
		<description>If the consortium simply concentrated on a standardized HTML format and layout for their content, leaving device makers to optimize their devices to satisfy those standards, that would allow dedicated and non-dedicated devices to access their content... which is more than the market they&#039;re going to get if they concentrate on dedicated devices alone.

I still don&#039;t understand how anyone in the biz can not see this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the consortium simply concentrated on a standardized HTML format and layout for their content, leaving device makers to optimize their devices to satisfy those standards, that would allow dedicated and non-dedicated devices to access their content&#8230; which is more than the market they&#8217;re going to get if they concentrate on dedicated devices alone.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t understand how anyone in the biz can not see this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Adin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/05/24/should-newspapers-create-consortium-for-e-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-1064731</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Adin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 13:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=22450#comment-1064731</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very interesting article. I think the idea of a newspaper consortium has merit. I am concerned about Plastic Logic&#039;s statement that they want newspapers redesigned for their device. If they want a uniform presentation, it will take away part of the character of the newspaper, something I would not like to see. If they simply mean a rethinking of how a nespaer is laid out so that it will work better on an e-device, that might be OK.

Personally, if the consortium idea does grab hold and a device like the Plastic Logic becomes available for newspaper subscriptions, I would gladly trade in my print subscription for the e-subscription, even at close to the current print price. What would be a good idea would be for newspapers and magazines to join in this consortium and then offer multiple-product subscriptions. For example, get the NY Times, Economist, and The New York Review of Books for $60/month. Sign up for a 2-year commitment and get the Plastic Logic Reader for $50. I&#039;m not sure how current magazine subscribers who are paid up for the next few years would work into the equation, but it can certainly be done.

Where do I sign up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very interesting article. I think the idea of a newspaper consortium has merit. I am concerned about Plastic Logic&#8217;s statement that they want newspapers redesigned for their device. If they want a uniform presentation, it will take away part of the character of the newspaper, something I would not like to see. If they simply mean a rethinking of how a nespaer is laid out so that it will work better on an e-device, that might be OK.</p>
<p>Personally, if the consortium idea does grab hold and a device like the Plastic Logic becomes available for newspaper subscriptions, I would gladly trade in my print subscription for the e-subscription, even at close to the current print price. What would be a good idea would be for newspapers and magazines to join in this consortium and then offer multiple-product subscriptions. For example, get the NY Times, Economist, and The New York Review of Books for $60/month. Sign up for a 2-year commitment and get the Plastic Logic Reader for $50. I&#8217;m not sure how current magazine subscribers who are paid up for the next few years would work into the equation, but it can certainly be done.</p>
<p>Where do I sign up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
