<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Library dumps Dewey Decimal System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/09/library-dumps-dewey-decimal-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/09/library-dumps-dewey-decimal-system/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:18:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dusk Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/09/library-dumps-dewey-decimal-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1076258</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusk Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=23279#comment-1076258</guid>
		<description>LuYu wrote:

&quot;If the catalogue were freely downloadable, people could load it and the maps onto their device of choice and use that to locate books.&quot;

We may see that in the future, but at the moment, I think we can&#039;t assume that the average library user is that tech-savvy or (since libraries often cater to poor people) arriving armed with handheld computers.

Your post makes me feel nostalgic, though, because I remember back in the days when the hot thing in library science was microfiche catalogs. There was that same sense of, &quot;Look! We can do things better than in the past!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LuYu wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;If the catalogue were freely downloadable, people could load it and the maps onto their device of choice and use that to locate books.&#8221;</p>
<p>We may see that in the future, but at the moment, I think we can&#8217;t assume that the average library user is that tech-savvy or (since libraries often cater to poor people) arriving armed with handheld computers.</p>
<p>Your post makes me feel nostalgic, though, because I remember back in the days when the hot thing in library science was microfiche catalogs. There was that same sense of, &#8220;Look! We can do things better than in the past!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuYu</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/09/library-dumps-dewey-decimal-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1076250</link>
		<dc:creator>LuYu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=23279#comment-1076250</guid>
		<description>Dusk:  That is what I was thinking.  Why not use both?  The library catalogues are on computers after all, and categorisation really is arbitrary.

Why not have kiosks with multiple indexing schemes and simple digital maps to the book&#039;s location?

If the catalogue were freely downloadable, people could load it and the maps onto their device of choice and use that to locate books.  HTML works fine on my phone, and I have made maps of whole cities for it. I cannot see how a map of a library would be difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dusk:  That is what I was thinking.  Why not use both?  The library catalogues are on computers after all, and categorisation really is arbitrary.</p>
<p>Why not have kiosks with multiple indexing schemes and simple digital maps to the book&#8217;s location?</p>
<p>If the catalogue were freely downloadable, people could load it and the maps onto their device of choice and use that to locate books.  HTML works fine on my phone, and I have made maps of whole cities for it. I cannot see how a map of a library would be difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dusk Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/09/library-dumps-dewey-decimal-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1075893</link>
		<dc:creator>Dusk Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=23279#comment-1075893</guid>
		<description>I read about this trend earlier and couldn&#039;t figure out why they didn&#039;t just stick section labels onto the Dewey-decimaled stacks. For example, you could have a &quot;biology&quot; section, and then within that biology section, all of the books would be in their proper Dewey order. That way, you could reach both the readers who want broad categories and the readers who want to find more specific subjects, such as marine biology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read about this trend earlier and couldn&#8217;t figure out why they didn&#8217;t just stick section labels onto the Dewey-decimaled stacks. For example, you could have a &#8220;biology&#8221; section, and then within that biology section, all of the books would be in their proper Dewey order. That way, you could reach both the readers who want broad categories and the readers who want to find more specific subjects, such as marine biology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/09/library-dumps-dewey-decimal-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1075876</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=23279#comment-1075876</guid>
		<description>Dewey is great for researchers, professors, and serious book people and not so great for the casual users that community libraries serve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dewey is great for researchers, professors, and serious book people and not so great for the casual users that community libraries serve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
