<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two-fold sales boost predicted from $99 iPhone intro&#8212;and, yes, that should help e-books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/14/two-fold-sales-boost-predicted-from-99-iphone-intro-and-yes-that-should-help-e-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/14/two-fold-sales-boost-predicted-from-99-iphone-intro-and-yes-that-should-help-e-books/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:01:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/14/two-fold-sales-boost-predicted-from-99-iphone-intro-and-yes-that-should-help-e-books/comment-page-1/#comment-1079261</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/06/14/two-fold-sales-boost-predicted-from-99-iphone-intro-and-yes-that-should-help-e-books/#comment-1079261</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see the iPod Touch coming down much in price. AT&amp;T subsidizes the iPhone. That&#039;s why it&#039;s $99, you have to sign up for a two-year contract. Then again, don&#039;t they usually announce new iPods in September? We&#039;ll find out then, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the iPod Touch coming down much in price. AT&amp;T subsidizes the iPhone. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s $99, you have to sign up for a two-year contract. Then again, don&#8217;t they usually announce new iPods in September? We&#8217;ll find out then, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
