<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeez, the W. Post is selling access to reporters, editors and Obama biggies: $25K to $250K &#8216;Salon&#8217; &#8216;sponsorships&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/02/jeez-the-w-post-is-selling-access-to-reporters-and-editors-and-obama-biggies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/02/jeez-the-w-post-is-selling-access-to-reporters-and-editors-and-obama-biggies/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:40:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/02/jeez-the-w-post-is-selling-access-to-reporters-and-editors-and-obama-biggies/comment-page-1/#comment-1093486</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/02/jeez-the-w-post-is-selling-access-to-reporters-and-editors-and-obama-biggies/#comment-1093486</guid>
		<description>Well, Steve, actually I&#039;ve seen much worse than the Post. I just wonder if any heads will roll. And just why is it that &lt;em&gt;anyone&lt;/em&gt; on the biz side felt confident enough to put out word about the &quot;Salon&quot; program without any vetting by the news side (at least according to the Post). What does that say about the balance of power? So, while I think the Post is one of the better papers, yes, it has a lot of answering to do to its readers.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Steve, actually I&#8217;ve seen much worse than the Post. I just wonder if any heads will roll. And just why is it that <em>anyone</em> on the biz side felt confident enough to put out word about the &#8220;Salon&#8221; program without any vetting by the news side (at least according to the Post). What does that say about the balance of power? So, while I think the Post is one of the better papers, yes, it has a lot of answering to do to its readers.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/02/jeez-the-w-post-is-selling-access-to-reporters-and-editors-and-obama-biggies/comment-page-1/#comment-1093402</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/07/02/jeez-the-w-post-is-selling-access-to-reporters-and-editors-and-obama-biggies/#comment-1093402</guid>
		<description>No, they&#039;re not.  The Post is just as desperate as everyone else to stay relevant and solvent.  This move, telling as it is, doesn&#039;t surprise me in the least, except in its openness... they&#039;ve brought the venerable backroom dealings onto the front porch, and they&#039;re serving caviar on ivory trays.  Amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they&#8217;re not.  The Post is just as desperate as everyone else to stay relevant and solvent.  This move, telling as it is, doesn&#8217;t surprise me in the least, except in its openness&#8230; they&#8217;ve brought the venerable backroom dealings onto the front porch, and they&#8217;re serving caviar on ivory trays.  Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
