Opera switch: Bliss so far, after switch from crash-prone Firefox 3.5
So far, so good. Opera hasn’t crashed in at least 10 hours of use—even though I’m running an Opera 10 beta. I’d have suffered several crashes if I were still using Firefox 3.5. What a time sink.
The only Opera glitch noticed at this point is how the comment counts display in the TeleRead blog—at least in the case of the post at the top. I see the number of comments all the way to the right. The word “Comments” appears under that to the left. A failing of the beta, or a fault at this end? Anyone noticing this with regular, nonbeta Opera?
Related: Opera the winner so far—as my replacement for the hated Firefox 3.5 and Firefox is a turkey—I’m rolling back to version 2.0 out of desperation and may switch to Chrome or Safari.
August 20th, 2009 at 9:09 am
I don’t know why your computer didn’t like it but I’ve had few problems with Firefox 3.5 and virtually none since they fixed the initial bugs. Opera is a good browser but not my cup of tea. I use Chrome a lot, as well. But Firefox is still my default and I get great performance out of it.
August 20th, 2009 at 9:47 am
Great, Spider—and may your luck with Firefox continue! I’m delighted you have not suffered the same hassles that so many people have. David
August 20th, 2009 at 11:10 am
I put this on the other post you had, but just in case…
I cured my FF issues by flushing the history. History -> Show All History, or Ctrl-shift-H. I then removed everything from “This Month” back. Just right-click the entry, then hit delete. Maybe this will work for you as well?
I came across it here:
http://www.raymond.cc/blog/archives/2009/08/15/firefox-3-5-slow-and-hangs-after-typing-a-few-letters-in-url-location-bar/
I use Opera from time to time myself, but I’m used to FF and the Extensions. But really, whatever works best for you!
August 20th, 2009 at 1:05 pm
I keep 3 browsers on my dock; Safari, Firefox and Opera. At least one of them works on any given document, however I never have had any of the 3 work with all documents. My observations so far in order of preference are Safari, Opera, Firefox. I am using a Macintosh.
August 20th, 2009 at 2:10 pm
I personally run Firefox and Chrome on my Windows machine - and pretty much straight Firefox on my Linux box. Oddly, Firefox 3.5 has worked out much better for me - memory usage dropped by 2/3 and stability went up.
My big problem was that Gmail hates Firefox. Having Gmail open in Firefox cost me 50% of my CPU all the time. It costs me 1-2% in Chrome. (CPU behavior is the same in FFx 3 and 3.5 - but FFx 3.5 uses about 150MB less RAM).
August 21st, 2009 at 6:12 am
Re clearing FF history - I’ve never needed much history so I set FF to delete it all when I quit. Preferences>Privacy>Clear history when Firefox closes (under “Settings…” check everything for History aside from cookies).
Can’t say I’ve noticed any CPU spike with GMail on my Macs when logged on via FF. Nothing like 50% that’s for sure. Right now I’m trying it and it’s hasn’t gone over 6.5% and is mostly around 1-3%. But really, why would anyone use FF (or any browser for that matter) to read GMail on their own computer? Set GMail up in your email app like any other email account, then you hardly ever need to go near it with a browser. IMAP rocks.
August 21st, 2009 at 6:50 am
I think the Gmail spike is a Windows thing - I’ve never noticed it on my Linux machine.
My reason for using Gmail in a browser is simple: I’ve never met an email app I didn’t hate. I don’t like them, I don’t set them up. I use almost entirely webmail and prefer to read it that way. I’m also normally using two computers simultaneously (Have my laptop beside the desktop) and syncing between the two is easier that way.