TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home

News & views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics
September 12th, 2009

Politicians don’t understand sharing

By Paul Biba

images.jpegHere’s a piece, licensed under Creative Commons, by technology journalist, consultant and author Glyn Moody. Nicely said.

Another ill-informed opinion piece from a politician about file-sharing:

Platinum selling artists Radiohead and Pink Floyd have said they are happy to see their music used as a sort of digital loss leader to sell other products, but these groups are the exception rather than the rule. The average musician earns less than £15,000 a year and losing royalties makes the day-to-day struggle even harder for them.

Those average musicians – just like average authors – will tell you the biggest problem they face is getting known, not getting paid. What musicians, and authors like me, struggle with is to get the word out about our stuff amongst the million other offerings out there. Believe it or not, simply having a distributor does not solve that problem: in my experience they pretty much expect *you* to do the marketing.


Paradoxical as it may seem, giving your stuff away is one of the best ways to make money. Not necessarily from the content – although that is possible, too, for example by selling physical CDs/books to people who have digital versions – but from ancillary revenue. This is not to be sneezed at: *all* the top pop musicians make much more from their live appearances than they do from their CDs (which is why an artist like Prince *gives away* CDs to people who attend his concerts).

As the quotation above concedes, giving away stuff isn’t a difficulty for the top artists, and as I’ve indicated, giving it away is precisely the best way for less well-known musicians to break out of their low-income ghetto.

So, really, the only people who lose out from the sharing of music online are the record companies, who find themselves without a role. But the idea that civil liberties should be curtailed simply to keep afloat a dying – and widely-hated, both by artists and consumers – industry, should be self-evidently absurd.

It’s worrying that the author of this latest simplistic attack on file-sharing, apparently “a former member of Runrig”, is unable to see this. He and other demagogues that attack sharing for whatever reason would do well to look at the facts, and not glibly regurgitate the propaganda of the industry and its lobbyists.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca.

Digg us. Slashdot us. Facebook us. Twitter us. Share the news.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • NewsVine
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Netvibes
  • Turn this article into a PDF!

One Response to “Politicians don’t understand sharing”

  1. totally agree with Glyn’s piece, and so does everyone else I know. Artists need the money from their work, not the greedy media hangers on, they are now obsolete, and no amount of politician spin is gonna save them. They have milked the people for far too long. They will now pay the price. ie get a day job.
    chris

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting