|
TeleRead calls for well-stocked national digital libraries in the United States and elsewhere. TeleRead's moderator is David Rothman (dr@teleread.org). For occasional highlights from this blog, join the TeleRead Mailing List.
TeleRead FAQ
TeleRead, dating back to
the early 1990s, is an evolving
proposal. Click here for the
basics.
E-books and All That
TeleRead's links to
e-books online
eBook Community
List
Electronic Book Web
Project
Gutenberg
Distributed
Proofreaders
GutenTalk forums and e-book collection
eBookWorm netcast
e-books.org
DLib
Blackmask Online
KnowBetter.com
PulpBits Ebooks
Read/Write Web
ePublishing Blog
mobileread.com
Tenebris
Open Source Novel Project
How TeleRead
could help
bloggers
Library-Related
The
Shifted Librarian
Handheld Librarian
American Libraries
Library Journal
Research Buzz
LIS Feeds
Library
Stuff
ResourcesShelf
Peter Scott
Catalogablog
Ex
Libris
Tinfoil+Raccoon
Alev the Wine Librarian
Open Stacks
Cites & Insights
Librarian Avengers
LibrarianInBlack.net
Free Range Librarian
The Digital Librarian
Rogue
Librarian
Librarian.net
LibraryPlanet
Caveat Lector
TechnoBiblio
|
|
Saturday, January 17, 2004:
E-books a hit with Indiana kids in demo, so far
So how will younger kids fare with electronic books?
Pretty well, if you go by an unscientific but endlessly useful experiment on the South Side of Chicago.
And now researchers at Ball State University in Indiana report good luck so far with elementary schoolers, ages 6-10. One childcare center administrator says the students actually "kind of quarrel over who gets to go to the eBook area first."
Encouragingly, at least some of the BSU-supplied books are of the public domain variety--available for free from places like the International Children's Digital Library, source of the book cover shown here.
More details from StarPress.com in East Central, Indiana, with links added to the material below: MUNCIE - Children at Huffer Memorial Children's Center no longer have to turn the page when reading stories like The Three Little Pigs or Alice in Wonderland.
Now they can push a button instead.
The childcare center has partnered with Ball State University's Center for Information and Communication Sciences (CICS) to offer 15 electronic books (eBooks) to grade school students aged 6-10. The eBooks are part of a Lilly-endowed university research project that is trying to determine how effective their use is in the K-6 learning environment.
"The kids enjoy these books immensely," said Paula Morris, director at Huffer. "They kind of argue over who gets to go to the eBooks area first."
Each of the eBooks holds 17 popular children's books and a dictionary in its memory. Kids can pick what story they want to read from an easy-to-use menu tab that highlights the choices. They can also draw and write on the tablet-sized devices with the use of a touch pen.
"I like drawing and erasing," said six-year-old Marcus Brown. "I can erase things with my finger. It's magic."
The university was matched with Huffer for the project through the United Way of Delaware County's Community Tech Link program, which provides technology planning, solutions, implementation and training to non-profit organizations...
Richard Bellaver, a Ball State professor and CICS director, said this was not the first time a research project had been carried out involving eBooks. In the past, the electronic devices, which are on loan from the Center for Media Design, have been used in experiments as textbooks for graduate students.
Bellaver said the goal of this current project, which is still in its initial phase, is to see whether kids favor the eBooks over their hard-bound counterparts.
He explained that eBooks would be lighter for a child to carry in his or her backpack because of their ability to carry so many stories in one device.
"We're also trying to test their durability," he said. "How many get dropped or spilled on and how well they are going to last." If nothing else, presumably, Bellaver will want to know how well the children do academically compared to those using paper books.
The earlier experiment with grad students showed that comprehension levels were essentially the same even if some of the subjects did not like the e-format as presented (something that could be improved).
My theory is that the kids in the new BSU experiment, being younger and more flexible, can adapt more easily.
Whatever the case, I really like Bellaver's attitude here:He hopes that, as the project enters its second phase, the kids will be able to take the eBooks home with them.
"I think all of these kids see one of these eBooks and think it's a new toy," he said. "I think they look at them and think it's fun." As gung ho as I am on print on demand and eager to see experiments with it, I'd hate for "pure" e-books to be automatically dismissed as another approach for young kids.
Meanwhile I wonder exactly what hardware Bellaver's using this time. The grad students in the earlier trial used black and white material even though some of the screens had color capabilities. Hardware was a mix of monochrome Model REB 1100s and color-capable REB 1200s.
So what's up now? Are the kids seeing color art with the text? I don't know from the news clip. Imagine the possible results, however, if the books can be as colorful as the cover of Alice in Wonderland. As noted, the illustration is from the International Children's Digital Library--and not necessarily the BSU experiment.
Come February, Bellaver and colleagues will start to question the kids and teachers in detail about their feelings toward the e-books. No telling what they'll conclude. And, again, academics matter--not just the kids' enthusiasm. But so far, apparently, so good if you go just by the E word.
Related: Academic Libraries Take a Look at E-Books, an Illinois study initiated by Lori Bell and Tom Peters of Handheld Librarian fame.
posted by David Rothman at 7:16 PM | permanent link
RealAudio format glitch: Just like e-books
I've just "upgraded" my audio and video software from RealNetworks. And guess what. For some reason, I can't get NPR audio now on my Dell Optiplex. Not exactly an advertisement here for Rob Glaser and friends--or net.audio in general. But, look, RealAudio's profits count more than my time, right? Gotta keep folks upgrading.
Ideally some publishers of e-book software can suffer similar experiences with RealAudio, show a little more empathy toward consumers, and take a Universal Consumer Format seriously.
A patron-friendly cause for librarians
Librarians can help. Think of your patrons, and if you go to the OeBF library conference on March 12, say "No" to proprietary formats. Put up with 'em now, but tell the vendors you'll recall be much better off with a Universal Consumer Format.
Your opinions will count. As a Wall Street Journal story has pointed out, the e-book business increasingly sees libraries as an important market. The e-book software companies need you more than you need them.
So don't wimp out. Tell software people and distributors that if they don't fully back the development of a UCF, they may lose your business in the future to rivals more interested in "real books"--books that aren't vulnerable to the format-related whims of techies and marketers.
Related reminder: Try out different formats on PDAs
Librarians should try out different e-book formats not just on desktops but also on cheapie PDAs. As Tom Peters points out in the Handheld Librarian, PDAs are "a major platform for reading e-books." While many PDAs do come now with e-book software, it may not be the same program that a library vendor favors. Or it just may be a real hassle to run. The best solution so far, based on functionality, features and aesthetics, continues to be Mobipocket, which is much nicer than Adobe on inexpensive handhelds and which runs on a bunch of different platforms.
Until vendors raze the Tower of eBabel, however, you'll ideally able to serve up books in different formats. This mess is great for format converters and other techies, but not so wonderful for readers, libraries, bookstores, publishers and writers.
posted by David Rothman at 6:07 AM | permanent link
Friday, January 16, 2004:
ALA and the Cuban librarians: A little progress but not enough
"A national group of librarians meeting in San Diego voted yesterday to express support for librarians jailed in Cuba but stopped short of calling for their release. The vote ended months of debate on an issue that has divided the American Library Association and drawn national attention. It came on the last day of the association's six-day convention, which attracted about 13,000 people to San Diego." - San Diego Union-Tribune, Jan. 15., via LISNews.
posted by David Rothman at 3:55 PM | permanent link
Wanna discuss Gatsby and other books via voice chat?
You can join voice-chat discussions of The Great Gatsby, a Louise Erdrich novel, a Theodore Roosevelt bio and other works. It's through Audio Avenue, sponsored by the Illinois Talking Book Centers and Maine State Library Outreach. Gatsby Day is Feb. 19. More details via the Handheld Librarian.
Idea: Perhaps some public domain sites can experiment with similar activities, and meanwhile it'll be great if PD books can serve as fodder for some future Audio Avenue discussions. Bet that'll happen. Tom Peters and Lori Bell, who run the discussion programs, which are for the vision impaired but open to anyone, are extremely hip on public domain issues, judging from Tom's questions from his TeleRead interview yesterday.
Detail: If you lack a mike or soundcard, you can still participate with old-fashioned typing.
posted by David Rothman at 11:20 AM | permanent link
'Emancipated voices: Online recordings tell of slavery'
"Deep, resonant like coming thunder is the voice of Bob Ledbetter as he remembers his life as a slave--singing to pass the time, learning to read and write, joining the church and getting married." - Washington Post story on the latest gem from the American Memory Web at the Library of Congress site.
Details from LOC: "These interviews, conducted between 1932 and 1975, capture the recollections of twenty-three identifiable people born between 1823 and the early 1860s and known to have been former slaves. Several of the people interviewed were centenarians, the oldest being 130 at the time of the interview. The almost seven hours of recordings were made in nine Southern states and provide an important glimpse of what life was like for slaves and freedmen. The former slaves discuss how they felt about slavery, slaveholders, how slaves were coerced, their families, and, of course, freedom. It is important to keep in mind, however, that all of those interviewed spoke sixty or more years after the end of their enslavement, and it is their full lives, rather than their lives during slavery, that are reflected in their words. They have much to say about living as African Americans from the 1870s to the 1930s, and beyond. As part of their testimony, several of the ex-slaves sing songs, many of which were learned during the time of their enslavement."
posted by David Rothman at 10:43 AM | permanent link
Print on demand for Illinois kids--and others, too?
In LISNews and TeleRead posts earlier this week, I suggested that libraries give away public domain CDs, DVDs and print-on-demand books. "Many classics from the Internet Archive servers are rather elaborately illustrated in old editions. No need for the state government of Illinois to be the source of all give-away books in the state!"
Well, lo and behold, it looks as if Ernie Miller and Jenny Levine have similar ideas (and were smart enough to play them up in separate posts, not hidden down in an item as I did). Good for them. May something happen! Particularly outstanding is the Miller suggestion that "you could have an option: check the book out and be subject to possible late fees, or pay $1 or so and keep the book. Might work out pretty well."
Now here's another twist. Perhaps, even without going to the library, families could call up specially prepared juvenile librarians and discuss POD book choices for the kids involved--and then pick up the books. Too, they could order via Web sites, along the way consulting with librarians via forms, IM or e-mail.
All of this would be far, far better than children just getting a standardized, state-blessed selection of books! I totally agree with a past headline in Jenny's Shifted Librarian blog: "Giving a Child a Book Versus Giving a Child an Entire Support Institution." Time to combine both library services and a feeling of ownership--which happens when kids can receive books they don't have to give back! What's more, let's see this idea extended beyond pre-school to cover all of K-12. (For kids old enough to write, libraries and schools could set up local, librarian-and-teacher-moderated bulletin boards and chat rooms where the children could share their discoveries with each other.)
If libraries in states beyond Illinois, can try this and if all library users of all ages can enjoy POD one way or another, then so much the better. At the neighborhood library level, no one's talking about megabuck expenditures of tax money, especially if patrons can pay modest fees if need be.
Help the kids build their own libraries--while they and parents maintain contact with the real ones. Certainly this is in line with TeleRead's permanent checkout concept.
Needless to say, by cultiviating an appetite for a wide variety of books, print-in-demand could hasten the mass popularization of e-books. But advocacy of specific formats shouldn't be the real goal here. Rather it should be to help books--old and new--find appreciative readers.
posted by David Rothman at 9:09 AM | permanent link
Thursday, January 15, 2004:
Yahoo does a B&N, exits e-book biz
Yahoo's e-book customers are now being redirected to the eBook Express site owned by OverDrive, as reported in Blackmask. See related item below about OD's changing business model. Would be nice if EBook Express would prominently display some books available in the Mobipocket format and advertise this--one way of showing that OverDrive is serious about promoting Mobi, whose interface and features leave Adobe, Microsoft and Palm Digital Media in the dust.
Also of interest: Forget about the tabs at the top of Amazon's pages. Now I can't even find e-books mentioned on Amazon's drop-down menu. Funny. E-books are supposed to be on the cusp of getting hot again. I think that will happen--but sharper screens and more titles won't be the answer by themselves. Less onerous DRM and an end to the Tower of eBabel could help, too, as could more interest in the school and library markets--a great way to acquaint nontechies with e-books. TeleRead, anyone?
posted by David Rothman at 10:15 PM | permanent link
OverDrive's changing business model: Watch Steve carefully, but cut him some slack
Over at Blackmask, one of my favorite e-stores and public domain sites, David Moynihan has correctly raised the issue of OverDrive now doing retail, as opposed to just software and the "back-end" routine. It'll compete with publisher partners and the e-bookstores it works with.
In this case, however, I'd say, "Cut OverDrive some slack right now." The more heavily Steve Potash goes into retail, the more his business interests will be aligned with those of publishers and stores rather than Adobe, Microsoft and Palm Digital Media. Does this mean that the industry shouldn't watch OverDriver very carefully? Of course not. Bolt if there's abuse! If, however, Steve's new business model can encourage him as president of the Open eBook Forum to take a Universal Consumer Format more seriously, then for the moment I'll keep an open mind. Please--stores and publishers ahead of software companies!
posted by David Rothman at 9:43 PM | permanent link
RSS feedback welcomed
A blog is a public performance. Updates happen. Perhaps I was unfair to someone in the first verson or I need to fix a typo (outrageously common, given my problems with Blogger's interface and the fact I'm a better writer than proofer). The TeleBlog is a stone tablet not.
Trouble is, RSS technology isn't as good as it should be, and recipients of RSS feeds may suffer multiple versions of a post. But then again, I want to be free to make tweaks--in the intererst of accuracy, fairness or other fixations of mine.
So here's a question for readers getting the TeleBlog via RSS. Are the updates bugging you (as they do at least one reader, who's just written me)? Let me know, and tell me which RSS aggregator you're using.
One partial soution could be the use of the Bloomba e-mail program, which combines mail and RSS feeds and collapses redundant items into threads. Not only that, it lets you quickly search all your messages at once rather than having to set up different mailboxes. Via the "view" feature, you can save searches.
posted by David Rothman at 9:26 PM | permanent link
Wanted: Spanish-language volunteers for Distributed Proofreaders
If only the Distributed Proofreaders organization could work in many languages. That's what we wrote. DP volunteers, who do scanning and OCRing and proofing for Project Gutenberg, have already made massive contributions to the public domain scene under the leadership of Charles Franks. In fact, DP is the biggest source of Gutenberg books.
Now, from Branko Collin, a DPer in Holland, comes this note expressing similar sentiments about non-English--and calling for volunteers: As one of the distributed proofreaders, I can assure you that our site absolutely loves other-than-English books. With Spanish the unfortunate case is that hardly anybody is interested in proofreading them. It even took a Dutch project manager to get started with Spanish texts. Please feel free to point your Spanish speaking readers to Distributed Proofreaders, we sure could use some help. Great group! Please help. What's more, here at TeleRead, I'm eager to hear from possible volunteers fluent in languages besides English. Especially I'd love to see a monthly or quarterly TeleRead newsletter in Spanish if the interest is there--not just a translation but something with original, localized content. No massive amount of time expected. Save plenty for Distributed Proofreaders, whatever language you can help it with!
Another good cause of Branko's: Wikipedia, an open source Web encyclopedia which even includes a Dutch edition.
posted by David Rothman at 6:14 PM | permanent link
In search of a Max Perkins for e-books
The world of p-book conglomerates looks all the more dismal when you read about a great independent publisher named Morgan Entrekin, head of Grove Atlantic--who has this bizarre notion that writers and editors can still be friends. That's scary. It takes us back to the days of Scribners editor Maxwell Perkins and the likes of Fitzgerald, Wolfe and Hemingway. Perhaps not so coincidentally, Entrekin's people have discovered works as varied as Cold Mountain and Sex and the City. He wants to make money, of course, but has the quixotic belief that books are worthwhile in themselves. No huge sales quotas to meet because Q2 is around the bend and Q1 was not so good. Could this little miracle have happened not just because of Entrekin personally, but also because his investors are friends and family?
Yes, the above relates to e-books. Corporately owned publishing houses have made their share of contributions to literature, but it would be a shame for the Entrekins to be killed off--either by the big guys or by junky smaller houses. Ideally someday the e-book world can see an Entrekin and hopefully a Perkins, too. For that to happen, though, quality must thrive and the need for cash and technological expertise should not get in the way. It's no small reason why I'm among those fighting for a Universal Consumer Format; let books find their buyers based on prose, plot and character, not the use of Format X or business arrangements with Software Conglomerate Y. The more distractions publishers suffer from the Tower of eBabel, the harder it will be to market literature, which, alas, does not always sell as well as Cold Mountain has. Format, not content, should be the commodity taken for granted.
Meanwhile I'm looking forward to Cold Mountain to see if it's as good as the critics say. I'll belatedly read it an old-fashioned way--after getting on a wait list at a local library. As far as I know, Cold Mountain has yet to exist in an electronic edition. What does that say about the industry? E-publishers can carp all they want about Luddites and the piracy fears of p-publishers, but mightn't something else being going on as well? Until e-books can appear in a standard consumer format and take off in a major way in schools and libraries, many old-fashioned publishing people may have trouble seeing them as "real" books.
Speaking of quality, perhaps an opportunity can arise here for librarians to fill a vacuum and seek out the Cold Mountains among books published only in electronic format. TeleRead, of course, would encourage librarians to make and publicize their own discoveries.
What's more, by driving down the cost of good books, TeleRead would foster more reading by young writers along with the rest of us. Entrekin apparently has his own concerns about education and literature. According to the Christian Science Monitor, he "feels that the important books come mainly from people of his generation and older. 'And what's going to be interesting to see is, can it sustain itself over the next 15, 25 years with a generation that has never been educated in the old-fashioned way." Paradoxically, by increasing access to the classics, not just the best contemporary writing, new-fangled books in electronic form could help.
(Christian Science Monitor, via LISNews.)
posted by David Rothman at 10:37 AM | permanent link
New Zealand's database consortium
More on New Zealand's database consortium. And get this: "The Ministry of Education agreed to fund all school libraries access to the e-resources for the first year." The consortium isn't TeleRead, but it's definitely progress. (Scoop item found via eBookAd.)
posted by David Rothman at 5:12 AM | permanent link
Wednesday, January 14, 2004:
TeleRead on eBookWorm Thursday, Jan. 15: Library e-books in the here and now--not just the future
The TeleRead plan for a well-stocked national digital library system, the public domain and related topics will be discussed on the eBookWorm netcast tomorrow between 4 and 5 p.m. EST. Questions welcomed! How about the permanent checkout concept? Or the idea of avoiding the "rationing" of e-books, so that many patrons can check out the same titles at once? I'm confident that Tom Peters, the eBookWorm host, will be asking his usual excellent questions, but people in Netcast Land can follow up with their own.
Yes, TeleRead is for the future. But what about ways public libraries can experiment now with free e-books--even amid budget crunches? In fact, Project Gutenberg-style books, either pointers to them or copies on your library's own server, could be one way to stretch scarce resources.
In case you're curious, the best-known public domain works tend to have been written before 1923. Why not a later year? You can thank Congress for that. Even with the damage from the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, however, the public domain is rich in popular-level treasures--from the Bobbsey Twins books to the easy-to-read classics of Jules Verne. The vision-impaired will benefit especially. Public domain e-books, unlike many commercial ones, aren't protected with DRM, which can interfere with screen readers--a real shame, considering all the advances in speech synthesis from AT&T and competitors. Check out TeleRead done Valley Girl style.
Promoting the classics
How can you encourage the reading of public domain books, whether authored by the ancient Greeks or early 20th century writers? Let schools--public and private--do some of the work. Team up with school administrators and professional groups to spread the word among teachers of English, history and other subjects, via newsletters, mailing lists and Web sites. Also post on the Net locally developed study guides that you find of merit (and think about tie-ins with relevant movies and TV programs).
For the Net, too, perhaps librarians, educators and others can write personal appreciations of public domain authors and books, which TeleRead, maybe LISNews and other sites could pick up. Mail 'em in! The essays ideally would be insightful but casual--in plain language and in the vein of, "What this author means to me today, and why I'm a fan." I've got dubs on George Gissing. Perhaps libraries could also invite patrons to submit their own efforts, with due recognition for the essays' authors and the library systems. Lit experts could pick out the best essays.
Library posters--with tear-off sheets with URLs
I'm also keen on libraries' use of posters of public domain books--with little tear-off sheets, so patrons needn't bother to write down URLs. Needless to say, too, libraries could give away CDs and DVDs of the Project Gutenberg collection (there's a downloading area for readers with high-speed connections, and other librarians can reach Gutenberg for actual disks). They could do the same with print-on-demand books; many classics from the Internet Archive servers are rather elaborately illustrated in old editions. No need for the state government of Illinois to be the source of all give-away books in the state! Just recently, a Utah official did some links to print-on-demand resources.
Of course, a related issue would be how to educate policymakers who control budgets. Circulation figures in the old sense should no longer count as much in an era when libraries ideally can giving away e-books--and print-on-demand ones, too, within budgetary limits. I'll welcome thoughts from librarians, both on the show and for the TeleRead blog, on how to address those questions.
Volunteers: One way to help patrons befriend the tech
But is the technology ready for e-books? Well, not for everyone, but in the TeleRead blog and in LISNews, I've published more than a few thoughts on the use of handhelds for people who'd enjoy reading e-books on them. I do! Perhaps at least some local libraries can arrange for members of local computer groups to help with support tasks and give other assistance to library patrons. That would also help create a built-in constituency for e-books--both commercial and public domain. Meanwhile, one excellent source of info on handhelds for librarians is the Handheld Librarian blog written by Tom Peters, eBookWorm colleague Lori Bell and others.
Talk to you Thursday, Jan. 15! And if you try out any of the above suggestions, let me know the results; in fact, feel free to ask questions along the way. If I can't help, maybe I know someone who can.
Tip: Go to the eBookWorm site early so you can install the necessary audio software, which is easy to download and use. Also, check the site in the future for more programs in the eBookWorm series. The TeleRead blog, too, will carry eBookWorm notices.
Helpful public domain sites: Among the most interesting sites are Project Gutenberg (the father of them all), Manybooks.net (popular formats available--with almost all PG titles included), Black Mask (a commercial site with a huge collection of free books in different formats, including my favorite proprietary one, Mobipocket). Memoware (Palm oriented), the Internet Public Library, the English Text Server, the University of Virginia e-text archive (including Microsoft and Palm e-book formats, not just ASCII and HTML), the Internet Archive (thousands of books blended with multimedia), the Internet Public Library of the United States ("over 27,000 HTML eBooks" from Gutenberg and other sources, via the World eBook Library), and, last but far from least, the International Children's Digital Library. Plus others too numerous to mention. In addition, you might want to read and distribute Project Gutenberg's suggestions on reading e-books in the formats used on handhelds. One reason why I like Mobipocket is that it's so handy with HTML imports, which means that you can read this common format without a need to mess with a less reader-friendly alternatives such as Adobe (the latter format is better suited for printing than on-screen viewing).
posted by David Rothman at 2:14 PM | permanent link
The perils of e-book rationing
"I'm always in the middle of a half dozen books. Often I finish none of them. This doesn't bother me--it's part of how I like conducting my reading and writing life, dammit." - Michael Whateverhislastnameis, writing in 2Blowhards.com.
The TeleRead take: Worth pondering! Michael wasn't alluding to e-books in particular, but his thoughts would apply. Ebraries as much as possible should avoid limits on the number of books simultaneously checked out. Alas, not all do--especially when popular books are involved, rather than reference volumes. Time to pay more attention to Jugglers, as I'll call such readers.
Wooing Book Jugglers
Many of the most avid readers don't want to gamble on just a few books based on summaries or even sample chapters. They'd rather juggle around a bunch and let the authors slug it out in the most Darwinian way to see who is most worthy of attention.
It's no crime for a Juggler to stop reading a book and go on to one deemed better. I'm a juggler myself. It's one reason why these days I'm so keen on public domain works without any checkouts involved.
How libraries and publishers can together grow e-bookdom
Libraries and publishers accommodate us Jugglers--publishers shouldn't fixate so much on the possibility of lost sales. At this point the issue isn't bookstore books vs. library books so much as it is getting people to read e-books, period. Ideally the e-lending models in public libraries can reflect this. E-publishers should cut librarians some slack if the multitudes are to acquire the e-book habit. Take advantage of the economies of the technology and show flexibility toward lending models that encourage readers to explore.
Under a TeleRead approach, publishers would receive compensation based on access counts (with payment caps in place to avoid budget-busting--while at the same time allowing publishers to invest money up front and along the way to raise the compensation limits on individual titles).
Needed: A business model to help reconcile two different cultures
I know. Most librarians by nature aren't risk-takers. But many publishers are. The challenge is to find a business model that bridges the gap between the two cultures, so that zillions of library patrons can access best-sellers immediately without depriving writers and publishers of a chance to make a living.
Small-scale experiments, limited to geographical areas or the works of nonbest-selling writers, could help refine the business model. And, yes, firms exist that specialize in risk analysis for business optimization. The same concepts could be used in a library context.
The bigger picture
Of course, many in the library field would say, "What business is it of mine, being an e-book advocate?" Plenty. Readers will go for convenience and saved time--not to mention their growing interest in Net-related information sources. The idea should be to encourage people to read books in any format, paper or electronic. Either public libraries will adjust or, very gradually but very inevitably, be Googled and Amazonned away.
(2Blowhards.com item found via LISNews.)
posted by David Rothman at 8:35 AM | permanent link
Print on demand tips: Interesting e-book alternative
Sure, we're big e-book boosters--given all the great public domain titles out there, waiting for quick browses before you commit to a full reading. Not to mention the nonDRMed titles from clueful e-bookstores.
But for libraries and p-bookstores alike, print on demand remains an interesting option as well. In his RSS in Government blog, Ray Matthews passes on information on the machinery and includes relevant links, including one to an NPR story, Book-Binding Techniques Could Revive Rare Texts.
Warning to the e-book industry: Conventional p-books aren't your only competition. Now you've got this to worry about. Time for a little action on a Universal Consumer Format and more consumer-friendly DRM for publishers insisting on copy-protection?
Another viewpoint: From eBookAd, John Zarakol writes in: "About the POD comment, we actually don't see that as a competitor, more like an extension of ebooks, since the source is always an e-book." May he be right!
posted by David Rothman at 2:07 AM | permanent link
Please--full RSS feeds
Don't you hate it when RSS feeds contain teasers, not full articles? Jenny Levine has a great rant on this. (OK, so I'm giving a one-sentence summary, but you get the idea.) Meanwhile Steve Cohen comments on the new Yahoo RSS service. Let's hope that library organizations heed his suggestion that they do the RSS act. Built-in RSS feeds are among the reasons why I like the Bloomba e-mail client, which, with its database capabilities, lets me hunt for keywords in e-mail messages and RSS items at the same time.
posted by David Rothman at 1:30 AM | permanent link
Tuesday, January 13, 2004:
If more e-books could get on phones...
"Sales of mobile phone ring tones, those tinny song recordings programmed into millions of handsets around the world, jumped 40 percent in the past year to $3.5 billion, according to a study released on Tuesday." - Reuters.
The TeleRead take: Imagine if just a fraction of the $3.5 billion went for e-books read on phones. And yet so far Microsoft hasn't even bothered to do a Reader update for its own Smartphone OS. Time for a nonproprietary format, so people aren't so much at the mercy of vendors? Maybe then, annual e-book sales would actually exceed the present $10 million or whatever.
posted by David Rothman at 5:17 PM | permanent link
DRM as a censor's friends--and maybe a boomerang against Hollywood and U.S. publishers
Could regional DRM coding be used for censorship overseas--and also boomerang against Hollywood and U.S. e-book publishers? Of course! Check out The Importance Of, a blog by Ernest Miller, a LawMeme contributor.
Related: New Boss At Patent And Trademark Office Helped With DMCA.
posted by David Rothman at 3:43 PM | permanent link
E-books and the ownership factor
Each child in Illinois would receive a book a month from birth until five years old, under a proposal from Gov. Rod Blagojevich. Further details: Infants would get their first book at the hospitals where they are born, and parents would then have to register to receive age-appropriate books each month for kids through age 5. Families would choose books from a list compiled by educators and early-childhood experts for the Dollywood Foundation of Tennessee, which has targeted literacy, said gubernatorial spokeswoman Cheryle Jackson. Some librarians are upset that the money--the first-year budget would be $26 million--wouldn't be going instead to the children's collections of libraries. Actually, however, Blagojevich is on the right track. A big difference exists between just checking out a book and being able to return to it again and again, especially if you're a young child and are identifying the object with Mommy and Daddy, both of whom read it to you regularly.
Ownership helpful for e-books, too
The identical conceptcwould apply in different ways to e-books. You can't hold 'em but you can hold the e-book reading device. And as for the "ownership" concept, you can "keep" public domain e-classics such as Alice's Adventures in Wonderland as long as you want. The same would apply even to some copyrighted library books under TeleRead's permanent checkout concept. It would be especially helpful when kids were old enough to choose their own books for a personal "library" on their handhelds.
Of course, I'm all in favor of libraries receiving money, lots of it, for programs to help encourage parents to get their kids reading; the actual p- or e-books are hardly a complete solution by themselves. But merely spending more money on juvenile collections in physical libraries is not enough in itself. "Ownership," whatever the form, counts. Indeed studies have shown that children do better in school if the kids can enjoy home libraries. A reason for academic success or just a reflection of motivated parents? I say both. What's more, suppose e-books of interest to the parents can be available online to get them reading and encourage them to serve as role models. TeleRead, anyone?
The format factor: Yes, there is a place, too, for traditional ownership of e-books bought from e-stores. But what's ownership? DRM and the Tower of eBabel mean you may or may not be able to read your purchase decades from now. You can with a p-book. E-books badly need a Universal Consumer Format. Until that happens, I'll do my best to limit my purchases to either paper book or at least e-books that aren't DRMed. Oh, the glories of public domain books. At least I know I can return to them again and again.
Related: In the challenging task of getting children to cherish books, four local educators' efforts speak volumes. Also see Hitting the Books: Back to the Library. E-books are a long way from satisfying students' full needs for content, and besides, the Tower of eBabel makes it risky for schools to invest too heavily in e-books anyway. May the Tower come down soon!
(Chiago Sun Times item and others spotted via LISNews.)
posted by David Rothman at 9:57 AM | permanent link
Monday, January 12, 2004:
Upbeat e-book article in Wall Street Journal--with focus on potential of school and library markets
For years we've been saying schools and libraries are where the e-book market is at--or at least much of it. Younger readers are less likely to be Luddites. If nothing else, they'd rather not lug around their reading in heavy backpacks.
Now comes a Wall Street Journal article that tells how tiny the e-book market is right now--at somewhere over $10 million in sales in '03--but correctly sees potential in, yes, schools and libraries.
If only the e-book biz can get its act together on formats and the like! Here's an excerpt from the subscriber-only WSJ piece, headlined The Plot Thickens: Remember e-books? Well, the final chapter hasn't been written on them yet. If electronic-book publishers like Rosetta Books LLC had their way, you'd be reading the book in your bag or briefcase on a tablet PC or a PDA--but not on paper.
Rosetta, the only established independent e-book publisher focusing solely on copyrighted literary fiction and nonfiction, got a big boost in the number of titles it offers in December 2002, when the New York-based company ended a bitter legal dispute over the digital rights of titles from Bertelsmann AG's Random House. The resulting licensing deal appeared to give Rosetta a powerful start over its rivals. With the privately held company's catalog secure, Rosetta's staff had hoped they could finally apply all of their energies to selling e-books.
More than a year later, though, the business is still struggling. Rosetta, as well as its rivals, found that there was more to the digital-book business than accumulating authors and titles. They have to persuade more readers to put down their paper-bound books in favor of digital ones with backlit text.
But Rosetta's chief executive, Arthur Klebanoff, sees hope for his company in an unexpected quarter: the library.
This past summer, Rosetta signed deals with two major book distributors, Baker & Taylor Inc. and Follett Corp., to distribute its books to public and school library systems. (Publishing companies mostly don't sell directly to schools and libraries, but count on third parties to distribute their books to them.)
"Right now a successful e-book sells 1,000 copies, but if we get into the classroom, 20,000 may be possible," says Mr. Klebanoff, who is a major shareholder in Rosetta. "We just don't know yet what types of content will be the most appealing, and which business models will work best." Highly open to economies of scale, e-books could really take off with a well-stocked national digital library system in place. Meanwhile I'm rooting for the success of experiments at the local level. Here are the Journal's details on Cleveland, whose e-book effort we discussed earlier in this blog and on the LISNews site:The Cleveland Public Library is also wooing digital readers, at DLC.Clevnet.org, says Patricia Lowrey, head of technical services. An estimated 5,700 e-books were checked out from April through the end of November.
"The public has embraced the system," says Ms. Lowrey, who estimated the start-up costs, including titles, at about $65,000. She noted that the system, which serves 31 libraries in northern Ohio, currently owns about 2,600 titles. "I got three e-mails this morning from other parts of the country inquiring about what we're doing," she added. She has also received inquiries from Italy, Spain and Australia.
While the libraries' affinity for e-books is still in its infancy, there are powerful economic forces that may make librarians willing to experiment. "At a time when public libraries are under budget pressures, what better way to extend services than free e-book downloads?" says Steve Potash, CEO of OverDrive Inc., Cleveland, which helps manage publishing digital rights.
Mr. Potash noted that CliffsNotes--those handy study guides--are among the most popular e-book titles. Unlike the copies lent by libraries, he says, kids can't tear them up or fail to return them. What the Journal missed in Cleveland: the potential of e-books for recreational reading, not just educational reading--as indicated by the most circulated titles in Cleveland.
posted by David Rothman at 2:26 PM | permanent link
E-booking while treading: Reader keen on REB1200 for workouts
In response to our earlier post on e-books and treadmills, a reader writes: How odd that you should mention that.
The REB1200 is perfect for reading while on a treadmill/stairstepper, and I have been using it as such for a while now. ?You can hold it in one hand, leaving the other for griping the rubber railings for stability, or wiping sweat from your brow, and still manage to turn the page with a thumb. Plus, the screen can easily be wiped off, unlike a paperback.
And the large print screen is a lot better than any Palm screen--at least I find it tough to read small fonts while moving.
Besides, used REB1200s are fairly cheap. Thanks! I already own a Gemstar REB1100 and am really tempted to follow the above advice. In fairness to Palms, however, you can use large fonts (available as add-ons) and auto-scroll. What's more, I still like the idea of a stand so I can keep both hands on the treadmill handles. But, hey, maybe I'm being too cautious.
Update, 7:50 a.m., EST: And from a second reader, this one in the UK: "Hi David, just a quick e-mail to say that I read e-books at the gym. All the machines have a small lip to rest magazines--on which holds my PDA ok. I have to admit that I don't run but do a brisk walk at 4.5 mph. I manage without auto-scroll with the layout set to landscape and have set the hardware buttons for next/previous pages using Haali Reader. I normally get bored enough to stop after 10 mins or so but while reading I can easily get to 30 minutes if engrossed. The last book I read was the excellent Captain Blood by Rafael Sabatini downloaded from Project Gutenberg. Keep up the good work." Alas, my antique treadmill lacks a magazine lip, but I'm delighted that the more modern models have 'em.
Update, 3:49 p.m., EST: Some of the response from Dave Slusher at the Evil Genius Chornicles: "I have read a number of ebooks (including Cory Doctorow's Down and Out in the Magic Kingdown) in a gym while working on a stair machine or orbital trainer. I was using my Handspring Visor Prism with iSilo." Dave says I'm making too big a thing of a stand, but then he hasn't seen my antique.
Update, 12:57 a.m., Jan. 14: Roy Lewis writes from Texas: "I have been carrying my REB1100 with the Levenger Leather case with me to the SR Citizens center at lunch time and manage to get 30 to 40 mininutes of walking/reading time. I have a GEB2150 (same as REB1200) but it is nowhere near as easy to hold/read as my 1100. I am looking forward to rumors that Sony will be releasing a DVD case-size reader using e-Ink technology this year. It should be much easier/lighter to hold and read in bright workout rooms."
posted by David Rothman at 6:42 AM | permanent link
The Walt Disney Text Access Act: A Proposed Bono compromise
The proposed Walt Disney Text Access Act just may drive my lawyer friends nuts, along with others. But my own theory is that copyright laws today do not count as much as which special-interest groups happen to be renting Congress and influencing Supreme Court nominations over the years.
I know there'll be howls aplenty. Just the same, the Text Access Act could be one possible way, besides the proposed Eric Eldred Act, to help mitigate the damage from the Sonny Bono Copyright Extension Term Act. So here is the idea, which may or may not have been put forth before. In specifying copyright terms, why not think about treating text differently from, say, films or TV shows or any other medium? Why not roll copyright terms for individual works back from the current life+70 to life+50 while leaving intact the extensions for corporate works such as movies? (And further limit the just-mentioned rollback to texts such as novels, nonfiction and short stories, with the possibility of individually copyrighted paintings, photographs and songwriters' lyrics also being included later on.) Remember, compared to, say, motion pictures, text is far cheaper to produce. The economics are entirely different. Individuals, not just studios, can come up with masterpieces without major investments ahead of time, and the Net will only reduce costs.
A compromise--to rescue the most important medium
Granted, I'd rather see Washington repeal term extension in all media. I still fervently believe this, and I would also be delighted to see the Eric Eldred Act passed to require copyright holders to pay taxes many decades hence to maintain copyright. But let's also think about a bill that now or at least in the future would repair the immense damage that the Bono Act has done to text, which, in terms of total importance to democracy, culture and education. is the medium most in need of easy and affordable access.
Jack Valenti and friends just might be at least a little less inclined to argue against this than against a rollback of terms in all media. In fact, in some ways, such as by reducing the cost of films adapted from novels and other written sources, the Walt Disney Text Access Act would actually save Hollywood money. It, of course, would be named in honor of a certain artist-entrepreneur whose company made a fortune by picking up public domain material such as stories from The Brothers Grimm Fairy Tales, which, in text, expressed old folklore. Textbook publishers would also be among the main beneficiaries of the Text Access Act. Why? Because the more the more classics are in the public domain, the more demand there will be for educational media, both the text kind and the multimedia kind, to explain such writings.
Would aid political debate
Needless to say, the Walt Disney Text Access Act would aid political debate, too--by allowing participants to quote material at length, verbatim, and point people to free copies of entire works. In the TeleRead Web Log, I myself have often quoted from public domain classics and included hyperlinks to the free editions available through Project Gutenberg.
Some might argue that by treating text differently, the Walt Disney Text Access Act would not be consistent. Then again, just how consistent has Congress been about other matters (it has even let states pass laws controlling rights to distribute old recordings)? Most significantly of all, it has run roughshod over the Founders' original concept that copyright terms were to be limited and to be for the main benefit of society rather than of individual creators. I know that extension advocates have noted that writers are living longer, but that is a rather silly argument, considering that for years copyright terms were considerably shorter than they are now. Only the most fortunate writers and their heirs will benefit from Bono in a truly major way; the odds of works becoming classics are so small that Bono hardly offers a major creative incentive beyond those available before.
Gissing's 19th-century observations: Even more applicable today
My favorite Project Gutenberg writer of the moment, George Gissing, summed up the situation well back in the late 19th century when he wrote in in his novel The Private Papers of Henry Ryecroft: With a lifetime of dread experience behind me, I say that he who encourages any young man or woman to look for his living to "literature," commits no less than a crime. If my voice had any authority, I would cry this truth aloud wherever men could hear. Hateful as is the struggle for life in every form, this rough-and-tumble of the literary arena seems to me sordid and degrading beyond all others. Oh, your prices per thousand words! Oh, your paragraphings and your interviewings! And oh, the black despair that awaits those down-trodden in the fray. Alas, the above observations are still true today, both in the States and in Gissing's England, as statistics from writers' organizations in both countries would undoubtedly confirm. In fact, I suspect that with the cost of living considered, writers as a group are actually poorer than in his era. Greater ease of adaptations, especially for new media such as net.radio, could actually improve their lot; some writers now doing dreary hack work might actually be just the type to write inspired adaptations. Even more important, future authors could benefit from expanded access to modern classics, just as other readers could; and this would be beyond the benefits to political debate and the rest. Perhaps it's time for Jack Valenti and lawmakers, including Valenti's very possible successor, to read a little Gissing and enjoy the richness that public domain text can add to contemporary political debate.
posted by David Rothman at 5:30 AM | permanent link
Sunday, January 11, 2004:
Do a treadmill act AND read an e-book at the same time?
How to exercise your body and, via an electronic book, your mind at the same time?
I've already told how to read an e-book in the bathtub, perhaps in defiance of Arthur C. Clarke's predictions. But how about treading while reading an e-book? Sure.
Mobipocket and Palm Reader and others offer auto-scrolling, which I suppose is a form of treading for the eyes, except that e-books are more fun.
Blow up the characters enough, and get the right stand to attach your PDA to your treadmill, and then you can do a book-treadmill act. Better to use the stand for safety reasons, of course.
No, I haven't tried this yet, but I suspect someone is already doing it. In fact, check this out.
Anyone out there with advice on stands?
Yo, publishers! Who says exercise videos are only way to receive health information while exercising? Maybe this is something Oprah can get into.
Update, 7:10 a.m. EST, Jan. 12: Yes, a reader has already written in to tell of his excellent adventures with his REB1200 and treadmill. Other comments welcomed.
posted by David Rothman at 12:25 PM | permanent link
George Gissing on the cost of books
Regular readers wouldn't be the only beneficiaries of a well-stocked national digital library system that included contemporary books, not just pubic-domain classics. So would writers, who could better keep up with literature in the here and now. Meanwhile here's a little perspective from George Gissing, my favorite Gutenberg author of the moment, writing in the somewhat autobiographical novel The Private Papers of Henry Ryecroft: Dozens of my books were purchased with money which ought to have been spent upon what are called the necessaries of life. Many a time I have stood before a stall or a bookseller's window, torn by a conflict of intellectual desire and bodily need. At the very hour of dinner, when my stomach clamoured for food, I have been stopped by sight of a volume so long coveted and marked at so advantageous a price, that I COULD not let it go; yet to buy it meant pangs of famine. All of the above is something to consider in the context of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, which jacked up the cost of literature for writers along with the rest of the world. It may actually have hurt many authors by driving up the expenses of adaptations of books for plays and movies.
Related: The ultimate book on starving writers just may be New Grub Street, also by Gissing.
About that Microsoft-format edition from Amazon: Would you believe, Amazon is charging $2.99 for an electronic version of Ryecroft, a pubic domain book you can get for free at Gutenberg and elsewhere. A big reason why? Because Amazon serves it up in a popular proprietary format. Oh the glories of the format wars. Yet another reason for a Universal Consumer Format. Actually even bookstores would come out ahead since they wouldn't have to cope with the Tower of eBabel in juggling around inventory. A huge operation like Amazon could especially benefit.
posted by David Rothman at 11:22 AM | permanent link
Electronic books and the battery tax
Lithium ion batteries, common in the PDAs and dedicated, Gemstar-style devices used to read e-books, typically last just two or three years even if not used regularly. That tidbit comes from the Washington Post today.
True? Not sure. May well depend on which battery guru you quote. I myself have indeed noticed declining performance in my used Dell PDA's auxiliary battery, which now will take only a 70 percent charge (of course maybe there's some weird software-related glitch that may be the culprit, not the battery itself).
At any rate, battery age might be something to consider next time you see bargain batteries on sale on eBay. You may want to see if they come with an expiration date.
A few more details: Here's the lowdown from Battery University sponsored by Cadex Electronics: "Lithium-ion benefits from a controlled life cycle test because the aspect of aging plays a less significant role. The service life of lithium-ion in real life is a combination of cycle count and aging. All batteries are affected by aging in various degrees."
The good news: Remember, OLEDs are on the way and will consume less power and presumably will lower battery costs, one way or another. Also don't forget the the Cholesteric Liquid Crystal Display technology that Kent Displays is refining. Even without power, existing images can remain on the screen. So instead of $75 batteries, you presumably need worry only about penlight cells.
posted by David Rothman at 10:37 AM | permanent link
Site Home
Page |
TeleRead FAQ |
Parents |
Publishers
Disabled |
Elderly |
Minorities |
US News article |

News and Views
More N&V Sites
TeleNews
eBookAd News
PPC eBooks Watch
Copyfight
bIPlog from Berkeley
Lawrence Lessig
Yale LawMeme
The Importance of...
TechDirt
Wired
News
Slashdot
Blind Chance
Boing Boing Blog
LISNews
RSS .91
RSS 2.0/PODCAST
Add TeleHeadlines to your Web site for free
Recent Posts
More News and Views
AudioActivism.org
Greensboro101.com
Jerry McClough's NAACP blog
Greensboro Is Talking
Tara Sue Grubb
Ed Cone
Publisher's Lunch
Publisher's Weekly
Dan Gillmor
John
Dvorak
MIT Tech Review
New York Times Tech
Lockergnome
Evil Genius
Ernie the Attorney
Luke Francl
Jon Schull
Idiotprogrammer
mistersugar
MaisonBisson.com
Branko Collin
Scholarly E-Publishing
Aaron Schwartz
Gnosium Blog
Andy Oram
E-Media Tidbits
MediaNews
News Is Free
Publishing Weblog
/usr/lib/info
Weblogs.com
Disenchanted
The Buzz Machine
Blogging News
Trend watching
Feedster
Bloglines
BlogPulse
Blogdex
Daypop Top 40 Links
Weblog BookWatch
Eaton Web Portal
Media Metrix
The Lycos 50
Archives
|