TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home
 Advocating Well-Stocked National Digital Libraries in the United States and Elsewhere

Main Home Page | Web Log Home | Blind/VI Edition | FAQ | Parents | Librarians | Publishers | Disabled | Elderly | Minorities | USN&WR Article

TeleRead calls for well-stocked national digital libraries in the United States and elsewhere. TeleRead's moderator is David Rothman (dr@teleread.org). For occasional highlights from this blog, join the TeleRead Mailing List.


TeleRead FAQ
TeleRead, dating back to the early 1990s, is an evolving proposal. Click here for the basics.

E-books and All That
TeleRead's links to
e-books online

eBook Community List
Electronic Book Web
Project Gutenberg
Distributed Proofreaders
GutenTalk forums and e-book collection
eBookWorm netcast
e-books.org
DLib
Blackmask Online
KnowBetter.com
PulpBits Ebooks
Read/Write Web
ePublishing Blog
mobileread.com
Tenebris
Open Source Novel Project
How TeleRead
could help
bloggers

Library-Related
The Shifted Librarian
Handheld Librarian
American Libraries
Library Journal
Research Buzz
LIS Feeds
Library Stuff
ResourcesShelf
Peter Scott
Catalogablog
Ex Libris
Tinfoil+Raccoon
Alev the Wine Librarian
Open Stacks
Cites & Insights
Librarian Avengers
LibrarianInBlack.net
Free Range Librarian
The Digital Librarian
Rogue Librarian
Librarian.net
LibraryPlanet

Caveat Lector
TechnoBiblio


This site is licensed 

under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license

This 

page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 
Saturday, May 01, 2004:
'Why news and technical DRM don't mix'

Loved this post in the Berkeley Intellectual Property Weblog. Not all of this applies to the e-book industry, but some does. Beware of the havoc that present-day DRM can wreak on the most helpful varieties of linking.


Ads in e-thriller from best-selling writer Matthew Reilly

Van HelsingCould ad-supported books on the Net help promote movies like Van Helsing? Or maybe Canon printers or Budweiser beer?

Might ads be an alternative to DRM overkill and the other fun to which publishers have treated readers?

I myself don't see advertising as a panacea. In fact, some "how-to" books intended to promote get-rich-quickers have been worse than worthless. Still, we need experimentation with a variety of business models, and the ad-support kind might work for some books and writers if (1) the content itself can be compelling and (2) the ads fit the books and don't overpower the writing.

The Pan Macmillan experiment

In the case of best-selling Australian writer Matthew Reilly, those two conditions just might apply. Sensibly he and his publisher aren't expecting advertising alone to justify their giveaway on the Net; they also want to whet readers' appetite for his work. But along the way, they have lined up sponsors. Details from the New Zealand Herald:

He is a writer of best-selling thriller novels but Matthew Reilly is committing what on the face of it would appear to be commercial suicide with his latest book - he is giving it away on the internet.

Reilly's publisher, Pan Macmillan, says the Sydney-based writer with five previous novels under his belt, is the first mainstream writer to freely release an entire manuscript online.

After being turned away by every publisher in Sydney, Reilly self-published his first novel, Contest. Now he is taking a calculated punt with the web release of Hover Car Racer, a thriller that is being published in eight online instalments, two of which have so far been released.

The chapters of the book are downloadable in PDF file format, a file viewer for which is free for download at www.adobe.com.

So far, the first two instalments of the book have notched up 27,000 downloads.

The motivation is not purely charitable, Reilly freely admits. He wants to broaden his readership with a view to selling more print books in the future.

"I'm trying to get to those people who don't go into bookstores. People in the office who are online all day. It's really to reach out beyond my existing readers," the 29-year-old writer said.

It's an experiment that has the seeds of a new business model for the release of popular fiction online because Reilly intends to make money out of Hover Car Racer in the long-term. Initially, the revenue is already flowing in the form of sponsorship.

Reilly said printer and camera maker Canon jumped at the chance to sponsor the book because it fits with their agenda of encouraging people to print more web documents.

United International Pictures also bought space at the top of the book's pages to push their upcoming movie Van Helsing.

Hover Car Racer will be released in print before Christmas.

In the meantime, the author is encouraging readers to distribute it - in marked contrast to the current trend of cracking down on the sharing of copyright material.

"I'm encouraging people to forward it on. For every one book I sell, I reckon four people read it. If you show some goodwill the market will come back and buy the books," says Reilly...
What a contrast to the 'tude of certain U.S. e-publishers, especially Palm Digital Media, which has made a big show of giving away public domain stuff you can get for free from GutenTalk, Blackmask and the like.

Details: Roy Lewis will love the Pan Macmillan experiment, as will Ed Howdershelt. Ed's Dragonfly Run, which I just finished, might be the kind of book that worked with the ad approach. Yo, Budweiser. This one could be for you.

Related: Corporate Sponsorship, by Ed Howdershelt.

(Reilly item found via eBookAd.)


Friday, April 30, 2004:
Compassion: One reason why Brit libraries spending so little on books?

Call it compassion, call it a protect-your-employees system, whatever you call it, this could be one reason why British libraries are spending so little on books--just nine percent or whatever. Imagine yourself in a library faced with budget cut after budget cut. Do you cut back on collection-building or fire your employees? Perhaps it's time for an efficient TeleRead approach where less money would go for concrete and steel and more would be available for books and people.


The Sonny Bono Internet Tax--on schools, libraries and consumers

Mary BonoCome to think of it, we already have a nasty Internet tax or at least a quasi one. Can anyone spell S-o-n-n-y B-o-n-o?

The Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act is a disguised tax on government and the public. Over the decades it will shift billions from schools, libraries and consumers in general to members of the copyright elite. Among the lucky beneficiaries will be none other than the descendants of the well-to-do lady to the left, Congress member Mary Bono. Well past the previous copyright terms, the family of Sonny's widow will collect from the RIAA, Warner Music Group and the Bono Collection Trust.

One way or another--for example, through somewhat higher taxes--Americans will have to cough up for old content that should be free. Republicans, Dems, no matter what the party, it'll be helpful for legislators to pass a ban on the Bono Internet Tax--or at least to consider the Lessig approach.


Net taxes would hurt evolution of e-books

Armey"State and local access fees could add 20 percent to 25 percent to the average Internet consumer's bill--a tax hike of about $150 per year." - Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, in the San Francisco Chronicle.

The TeleRead take: I'd side with Armey on this one. E-books and learning in general will benefit from "always on" connections of the kind that broadband and Wi-Fi will encourage. Imagine a mix of Wi-Fi and e-books with interbook links and no downloading-speed issues for multimedia e-books.

Simply put, the last thing society needs is for governments to make it more expensive to connect in an up-to-date way. For that and a variety of other reasons, the tax ban should remain. Hmm. You think that the Open eBook Forum would actually care about this? Many groups are at work against Net taxes, but every little bit should help, especially when it involves books and education. Click here to support a moratorium on Net taxes.

As for ways to pay for rural connections, I can think of a zillion and one other possibilities if techno-evolution alone won't do the trick by lowering costs.


Thursday, April 29, 2004:
Dallas-Plano library comparison: Which library district would you like YOUR child to grow up in?

Without comment, Roy Lewis in Garland, Texas, was nice enough to pass on a means to compare the library systems of Dallas and the suburb of Plano for 2002, the latest year available this way.

Dallas spent $21.35 per capita in total operating expenses and $2.99 for library materials (14 percent of opp expenses), while Plano spend $38.64 per capita in total operating expenses and $4.57 on materials (12 percent). And remember. The materials expenses presumably include everything from Shakespeare to VCR cassettes, not just books. In both cases, the percentages may well be in line with the 9 percent that British libraries reportedly are spending on books.

Which of the two Texas library districts mentioned would you like your child to grow up in? Time for a well-stocked national digital library system to help narrow the gaps and increase the actual percentage of material spent on content, especially books? In case you're tuning in late, see Library palaces vs. a child-friendly neighborhood approach.


'Trump fires Bush' video

This parody video in .mov format is just too funny to pass up. In Copyfight, Ernest Miller examines the copyright implications and hopefully doesn't spoil the fun for the rest of us.

Note: Fair's fair. If any GOP types come up with equivalent parodies and can provide URLs, send 'em on.


Library palaces vs. a child-friendly neighborhood approach

Dallas library palaceStinky homeless men staring at porn on library computers. Unzipped flies. Threats against female patrons. A slew of thefts. 117 police calls in 12 months. That's life at Dallas's downtown library palace, if you go by an article in the Dallas Observer. If the story is accurate, library bureaucrats have tolerated this mess far more than they should. At the same time the 'crats have tried to impress the library world with a Declaration of Independence exhibit, a Shakespearean one and ambitions to create "a highly respected research library" amid the chaos.

Don't children and the public at large suffer, though, when bureaucrats and politicians fixate on downtown library palaces at the expense of neighborhood branches within walking distance of many students? And might an additional emphasis on e-books and other electronic items be part of the solution, especially for the homeless? Before making up your mind, read Billy Barron's observations below from the Dallas area. Most are not about electronic libraries directly. But they are rather relevant since e-books must be considered in the context of the here and now, the paper world. Billy compares several Texas library systems and essentially concludes that except in small towns, libraries are most effective with a strong emphasis on the branch approach. I'll have more to say at the end of this TeleBlog item. But first, abridged, here are Billy's thoughts on library systems in Dallas, Garland, Richardson and Plano.

* * *

DALLAS: Population 1.2M, spread out, centralized palace library with neighborhood branches

Dallas built its library palace in the downtown area. Downtown Dallas is a dirty place where nobody feels safe at night. Parking is terrible during the day. On top of that, homeless people from what I have read invade the library during the day because they have nowhere else to go to get out of the heat. Martha Brown, a principal of a charter school in Dallas, is scared of going alone to the central library to check out the materials there. According to the Dallas Observer:

Brown says she is familiar with the homeless at the library from many years of working downtown and is wary of the building because of them. She says she will not go to the downtown library alone and wouldn't bring children there either. She'd take children to a neighborhood library instead, she says.

"That was one of the things that steered me away," Brown says. "I didn't feel like dealing with that."
People in Dallas hope that better facilities for the homeless will help. But the homeless are not the only problem. The central library has drained away resources that could go to neighborhood branches that families could visit without all the fuss of going downtown. In Dallas the branch libraries are small, poorly stocked, and mostly useless. You're much better off going to Barnes and Noble if you are trying to research a paper for school. Do I expect this to change? No, the powers that be want to revitalize downtown Dallas, whereas everybody else just never wants to go there.

Very, very interesting food for though especially with regard to TeleRead. A good online library system would enable even little neighborhood branches to offer a wide variety of books, which could be read either there or at home.

GARLAND: Population 200,000, spread out, centralized non-palace library with neighborhood branches

Garland is smaller than Dallas, the downtown is relatively safe, parking is easy and there are no homeless in the centralized library. The Garland branches, to one of which I used to bike as a teenaged resident, are even smaller than the ones in Dallas. Still, this system is a step up from Dallas's.

RICHARDSON: Population less than 100,000, relatively compact, centralized library at the geographic center of town with no branches

Richardson, whose school district I was in, has a single semi-nice library--not a palace. Probably a wise choice since anyone in town can get to it within 10-15 minutes.

PLANO: Population 250,000, spread out, peer library system

I like Plano's approach. There are five branches, and no main branch, and each one has around the same number of books as the other, and, I think, has the same hours. Each branch does usually has a special area of strength such as business research, but that is a reasonable thing. The Plano system has also done an excellent job of making it easy online to get a book transferred from one branch to another--the next day if an item is in stock.

"On top of this, Plano's system is completely integrated with that of Allen, the small town next door, so patrons from both cities can use both library systems. They share the computer system with the community college district so you can see the catalog over there as well. You need a different library card to use it, but any citizen of the county can get one.

* * *

That's the end of Billy's informal note to me. So what are the lessons here?

1. No, we shouldn't immediately sell off large central libraries. I can see their usefulness for museum-style displays, for example, and for collections of city history. Too, central libraries could be good for meetings of large civic groups.

What's more, e-books aren't going to replace p-books overnight. But in planning for buildings that will be in use for decades, it's sheer folly for library administrators to act as if the status quo will last forever--not when e-book technology keeps improving. Libraries should embrace it, not fear it, and think less about palaces and more about neighborhood branches, which, through the new technology, could offer a wider selection the palaces do.

2. Behavior rules--whether affecting the homeless or anyone else--should be helpful and well enforced. Needless to say, this is much harder to do in a library palace than in a branch library. In Dallas, at least, the library palace apparently has become the equivalent of a large urban high school, a library version of the Blackboard Jungle.

3. E-books and other electronic holdings could be especially valuable to the homeless, since these items could be offered at homeless shelters for 24/7 access. That would be better for both the homeless and library users as a whole. Why mix children and the most menacing of the homeless? Just what kind of political correctness has allowed library administrators to allow for this outrageous situation? I'm against library filtering and the stupid laws that Washington has inflicted on local libraries. But is it really the constitutional right of the homeless to plop down next to a child and gawk at explicit porn? Let them do so in the homeless shelter. And guess who at times should be on the scene at the shelters to offer help in person to augment the electronic variety? Librarians! Meanwhile, yes, I realize that the problems at Dallas are not the librarians' entire doing. But they should be more aggressive in resisting the urge of some to let libraries serve as homeless shelters. More money for the real McCoy, please. And make certain, too, that the shelters are located where they will do some good. That might be problematic in Dallas.

4. Even with the advent of e-books and a well-stocked national digital library system, appropriate allocation of local resources among branches would go a long way. A branch in a low-income neighborhood deserves reference librarians familiar with the needs of the local jobless. Similarly a reference librarian in a neighborhood full of retired people should be familiar with such issues as financial planning. Libraries could help adapt electronic resources to serve the needs of neighborhood users. Can't libraries learn from the chaos of centralized urban school systems? The neighborhood-oriented approach is best--for children and the rest of us. Don't abolish headquarters libraries, even in the future; but, as the Dallas experience shows, there is need for more balance.

5. Library palaces should not be built with general downtown economic needs prevailing over library and educational needs. Might localities be better off selling or renting some downtown library assets and turning the revenue over to the branches? And what happens when e-books finally do displace the p-variety? Here's one idea that could benefit both down libraries and branches. Why not grant free workspace and even residential space in the oversized buildings to gifted young writers, artists and musicians--and older ones, too--who would serve as human magnets to help draw people to central libraries. At the same time, as part of the deal, they would be required to visit the neighborhood branches and help mentor the kids there. Perhaps the best candidates could be screened through volunteer work to see if they were suitable. Such programs could start small and maybe even stay that way to avoid boondoogles.

Details: The Dallas library's budget page shows no fiscal year later than 1999-2000. What's going on? What's more, the branch hours could be better. If I ran the Dallas Public Library, I'd worry less about fancy exhibits and more about keeping the neighborhood branches open for kids to do their homework. Needless to say, electronic libraries can be always open--a boon to children in an Internet era when even some schools are beginning to understand the need for e-books.

Update, 10:55 a.m., April 29: Billy has pointed me to the missing library budget info within the overall Dallas city budgets for FY03 and FY04.

"From looking at these," Billy comments, "you will notice budget and head-count cuts. At one level, the city slashed budgets across the board so this is probably typically for a city department. The city budget is a big mess due to bad political decisions, but you'd have to read the past 10 years of the Dallas Observer to begin to understand that.

"This line is interesting, though: '241,952 citizens will benefit from library programs.' Only about 1 in 5 or 6 citizens? I don't know if that says something about the library system or the citizens themselves--probably both.

"'Meanwhile, yes, I realize that the problems at Dallas are not the librarians' entire doing.' Absolutely, they are mostly City Hall's fault. That's a long, long, long discussion that is a tangent that I won't go into."

Significantly, of Dallas's 1.2 million population, just 241,952 use the library. Plano, as Billy notes, "has about 170,000 patrons out of a population of 240,144. Part of this is that Plano's population is mostly upper middle class with a Top 10 school district whereas Dallas is demographically diverse.

"Also, it is interesting that Dallas' goal is to maintain turnover of 2.0 per item. Plano is sitting up in the 3.7 range.

"Each branch in Plano has a budget from $1.1 to $1.5 million so it is even distributed. Note: I didn't include that Muncipal Reference Library--it is more of an internal reference library for city staff which though available to citizens is rarely used as such."

Now--to return to the big picture. Isn't it possible that stronger branch libraries and eventually e-books could help Dallas's library usage rate be at least somewhat closer to Plano's? No miracles promised. But if you force the poor to make the trek to the central library after a hard day as a cook or janitor, usage obviously will be lower than if generous supplies of books matching their interests were closer to them--ideally within their own homes. That's what TeleRead is all about! What's more, far from replacing neighborhood libraries, TeleRead would make use of them as support centers--in both the tech and library senses. Branches help hold neighborhoods together. How sad that Dallas is so oblivious to the need to support them fully and would rather go the edifice complex route.


Wednesday, April 28, 2004:
Coming: The Dallas Library Palace--and the undernourished branches

Billy Barron, an e-library pioneer, saw the U.K.-related items below and came up with some heart-felt analysis of The Library Palace Syndrome in Texas. I'll run his comments later today or tomorrow, complete with one of the questions he raises in passing. Can the homeless and kids mix safely in Library Palaces? Yes, there's a common thread in all this. Library systems should be playing up e-books and neighborhood branches, rather than catering to the edifice complexes of politicians and bureaucrats.


Outrageous British stats show need for e-books for U.K. libraries

Libri logoTeleRead has long called for the use of e-book technology to increase the number and variety of library books in the States and elsewhere.

Statistics on the Hampsire library system in the U.K. make powerful case for a TeleRead-style approach, which would offer both public domain and contemporary books and blend them in well with local schools and libraries.

The bloody details

Via the recent Libri study, here's a list of authors, titles, and chances of finding them in Hampsire libraries. All three public domain book mentioned below, incidentally, are available for free in the major e-book formats via the PD side of the Blackmask bookstore in the States--a one-man operation whose completeness should embarrass library bureaucracies everywhere.

Jane Austen, Sense and Sensibility, 83%
Luke Rhinehart, The Dice Man, 5%
Fyodor Dostoevsky, Crime and Punishment, 54%
Terry Pratchett, Mort 39%
J.D. Salinger, The Catcher in the Rye 42%
Jack Kerouac, On the Road 54%
Katherine Mansfield, The Garden Party, 32%
J.R.R.Tolkien, The Two Towers, 84%
John Steinbeck, Of Mice and Men, 53%
Joseph Heller, Catch 22, 36%

Quite relevantly, a BBC radio report includes an account of a library visit where the staffers outnumbered the actual library users. Could numbers like those above be part of the reason? Is too much money going for staffers and not enough for books? Actually I'd like to see generous spending in both areas--instead of on downtown library palaces. E-books could help free money for both content and staffers to help people absorb it, especially the poor and non-English speakers, who, like other library users, often rely on libraries for authoritative information in areas ranging from job training to health.

When book spending lags

In the U.K., more content could help reverse the horrors of the chart below, showing past, present and projected trends in library-book borrowing. Even allowing for hyperbole in the projections, the numbers are bad news for library boosters everywhere. Usage stats are far higher in the States, but if nothing else, the U.K. numbers serve as a warning against smugness as more and more families gain access to high-speed Internet connections and spend more and more time on Web sites and on movies on demand--and less on books.
U.K. Library Usage


U.K. public libraries dead by 2024? A TeleRead perspective

The IndependentA library activist group called Libri warns that public libraries in the U.K. may be dead in 20 years. In A minute's silence, please, for the late public library, the Independent spells out the details from Libri's report and elsewhere.

"There were 377 million loans recorded from British libraries in 2003," says writer Ian Herbert, "down from a reported 480 million in 1999." U.K. libraries are spending just nine percent of their budgets on books, many of which are now outdated.

Seattle libraryIt's a lesson for all librarians, especially here in the States where short-sighted cities are squandering money on contruction or maintenance of library palaces downtown at the expense of hours and collections in neighborhood branches.

Even well-off cities such as Seattle, site of the new palace shown here, can't do everything when times are tough. Priorities, please. As it happens, just a fraction of U.S. library spending goes for books and other text. Let's learn from the mess across the pond, which is apparently is even worse than ours.

Net vs. books

Given the U.K. book crisis, is it any wonder that schoolchildren at many libraries now beeline for the computers--to visit Web sites full of questionable information--rather than reading books as their predecessors did?

"In the past," the Independent quotes one librarian, "we'd have a rush of book inquiries when children came out of school with their homework at four o'clock. "Now it's only the Internet. It's been the biggest change in my 30 years here."

A far cry from the past

Compare that statement with the reflections of a British writer quoted as saying: "I used to go to the library so much it made my mother cry. I practically lived at the local library I visited...I withdrew 10 books a week and went once during the week and twice on Saturdays."

Yes, that's a writer speaking. But clearly more books and newer books would help--and not just the young:

Stewart Fawcett, 65, has long since exhausted the library's supplies of travel books on Crete, something of specialist genre for him. His Heald Green borrowing record on the subject includes the 1890 tome Travels in Crete , which he obtained on order, but the most modern guide he can find today is dated 1993. "The Crete books are way outdated," he grumbled, settling for a James Herbert paperback instead. "I can't find anything of interest."
The article cites a recommendation that more money go for books, presumably the paper variety. Yes! But along the way, why not also consider a well-stocked national digital library system in the TeleRead vein to reach Net-oriented children, stretch resources and vastly improve the number and freshness of books?

Related: "UK libraries out of use by 2020" and Is this the library of the future? from the BBC, which offers an audio in RealPlayer format. In the latter story, it's clear that books are being played down. What's the point? Are libraries to be little more than free video stores? I'm all in favor of multimedia, but a little balance could go a long way.

(Report found via LISNews.)


Tuesday, April 27, 2004:
E-books at Dallas-area school

"In Forney, Texas, a fast-growing suburb of Dallas, 10- and 11-year-old schoolkids are set to cross a technology divide to an area many adults won't venture into--electronic books." - Reuters, via Forbes.

The TeleRead take: Considering the many prejudices that adults have against e-books, it should be easier for the fifth and sixth graders to adjust. Details:

Starting in August, more than 100 students in the fifth and sixth grades of the Forney Independent School District will receive notebook computers that contain as many textbooks as the school can muster the rights for, as well as thousands of classic works of art and literature.

Instead of opening books, the children will log onto school-supplied laptops to access their math and science textbooks or read American literary classics such as Mark Twain's "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" or Stephen Crane's "The Red Badge of Courage" about the Civil War.

"Our generation didn't learn to read on a computer screen, so most parents have an issue with that," said Mike Smith, Superintendent of the Forney school district. But today's fifth and sixth graders don't see it the same way.

"They just operate differently than we do. They're digital kids," Smith said.
Exactly! When will more schools get it?


'The Next Chapter in Electronic Books'

We e-booker can use all the good news that's out there. The Next Chapter in Electronic Books is a somewhat upbeat Forbes article mentioned earlier in this TeleBlog. But a little redundancy won't hurt since at least two readers missed the original item--tucked away at the end of a Librie-related post--and wrote in to suggest a link. Thanks anyway; I might well have overlooked the Forbes item.


Hate site vanishes from Google's top ranks without help from the Big G

A hate site is no longer the first on the list when you type the word "Jew" into Google. Nothing deliberate happened at Google's end, however; see CNET for the full story. (Via Mike Cane.)


E-bestsellers reach Denver library--complete with Mobipocket format

OverDriveThe Denver Public library is playing up e-books to the hilt and has a spiffy-looking new area powered by OverDrive, complete with offerings in the Mobipocket format. It's a welcome change from the increasingly outdated Palm Digital Media alternative that OD had been featuring. Adobe, as usual, is also a choice. Details via an OverDrive press release:

The Library's eBook collection includes bestsellers and classics, fiction and non-fiction, from popular authors and leading publishers such as HarperCollins, McGraw-Hill, Zondervan, and John Wiley and Sons. Patrons download free reader software and then use their Denver Public Library cards to check out and download eBooks.
I don't see Random House among the "such as" publishers. Are Random books available to the Denver library's e-patrons? I wonder what the lowdown is as far as OverDrive offering the House's books to consumers and libraries. The OverDrive home page, however, does list Random House among the "Spotlight partners," suggesting in effect that a distribution arrangement is intact.

Elsewhere on the pubic library front: A "pro" reader speaks up in the debate on the letters page of the San Jose Mercury (reg. required). Among other things she praises the ecological benefits of e-books. Yep. Earthday would have been a great promo hook for the Open eBook Forum, no?


Audio eBook Expo

What's the future of the audiobooks--for "adults, children, the visually impaired, the learning disabled, and more"?

That's the theme of Audio E-Book Expo: Exploring DigitalBooks and Content” on Friday, October 29 at Alliance Library System, East Peoria." Details:

Experts will share the latest in web-based ebook management systems, handheld players, and collaborative projects.

Key-note speakers include: Tom Peters of TAP Information Systems, Steve Potash, CEO of Overdrive, Inc., and Jenny Levine, “the Shifted Librarian”, Suburban Library System.

Other speakers include Jane amberlain, Adult Services Manager at Bloomington Public Library, Lori Bell, Mid-Illinois Talking Book Center, Sharon Ruda, Illinois State Library Talking Book and Braille Service, and Diana Sussman of Southern Illinois Talking Book Center. There will also be time for exhibits and ideas!

Cost for the day is only $25.00 which includes lunch.
Interested? Reach Lori Bell at the Mid-Illinois Talking Book Center, at (309)694-9200, ext. 2128, or lbell@alliancelibrarysystem.com.


Monday, April 26, 2004:
Sony Librie: Even more anti-reader than Gemstar if you go by an early buyer's facts

Sony LibrieSony's Librie reportedly has debuted in Japan with a library of just 400 books. That's not all. Your purchase, er, your rental, will vanish in 60 days after you've plunked down your $5 or so.

The "moldy list of books," as one early Librie buyer describes it, includes some public domain titles that normally would be free and yours to keep forever.

While the $375 Librie is officially available only in Japan, this is an insult to readers all over the cosmos, especially since you can't even use the machine right now to read newspaper and magazines.

Gouge bad for Sony's hip image

Simply put, the Librie crew makes the old Gemstar greedsters look like Mother Teresa. Invidividually I suspect they're nice people. But the end result is ugly and will do little for Sony's image as a consumer-hip corporation.

If I were E Ink, I would be screaming about Sony's tainting this wonderful new technology with such an anti-reader business model. At least in the U.S., the Japanese conglomerate's PR people have not explained the company's logic despite calls to East and West Coast offices. This could change. I've just been given the name of a key planner of Sony's e-book strategy and will follow through--hoping he'll be responsive to the well-intended criticism here. Sony has not settled on the business model for a U.S. version, assuming that it does offer the Librie here. I fervently hope this happens. But today's Librie just isn't ready.

No, I haven't tried a Librie myself for a possible purchase, but as I learn more about the machine in its present form, I'm far less inclined to. Yes, I know. Much more content will be available later on. But how about the problem of the vaporized books? Or the fixation on a such a Sonycentric approach? Sony needs to go on record ASAP with a statement that it will support HTML and ASCII and the like, as well as proprietary formats from other companies. As much as I love the idea of a Universal Consumer Format, it's important for readers to be comfortable in the here and now.

Beware of journalists in rave mode

While certain journalists went into rave mode about the Librie, the true e-book lovers are finally getting out the ugly truth about the machine in its present form. Even the New York Times, which was aggressively blithe about the vaporbook issue, will eventually catch up--given how the salient facts are.

In First Look at the Sony EBR-1000 Librie eBook Reader, appearing in the dottocomu blog, a buyer named Kakyou understandably pays tribute to the high-res display and long battery life. But then he devotes more than half his review to "The Bad" and "The Ugly"--and understandably so, especially when you read the U section.

"The bad"

"The page turning buttons," Kayyou says, "are the biggest disappointment...too small, awkwardly placed...and not very responsive." What's more, he complains: "I feel I have to wait almost a full-second between screen presses while the screen refreshes." That's "OK for page turning, but murder" when typing text into the dictionary and waiting for the results to appear.

On top of the other problems, you can't get your PC to talk to the Librie if you aren't lugging around the e-book reader's power supply to supply the requisite juice.

"The Ugly"

Why am I beating up so hard on Sony for the Librie's inability to read HTML and other common formats? Well maybe some tough love just might be the solution here. I'm just stunned that the company is so blind to readers' needs, in the States and maybe even in Japan.

Now, in its entirety, here is "The Ugly":

So the rumors have been around and the details available for a few weeks now. Sony has opted for a DRM and distribution system for the Librie that must have been designed by the same guy who made up the guidelines for NetMD's DRM. In other words, some dinosaur in SonyHQ who still doesn't read his own e-mail since he can't use a keyboard.

As of launch day, Sony's new book rental program contains a whopping 400 books. That's it. The convenience store down the street from my apartment has a wider and more current selection. Also, the innovative (read as idiotic) new 60-day-and-it-evaporates download service has no periodicals! No magazines, no newspapers. The only types of documents that would lend themselves to a rental system aren't even offered. Instead we end up with a moldy list of books that would be public domain if it weren't for the fact that Japan doesn't believe in giving away information for free, even if no one would want it.

As for permanent content, well there ain't any! Not yet anyway. So right now, if you don't keep buyin' the crappy book, you have 60 days to finish it, or you gotta buy it again. Oooo, that will be a popular concept. So distribution sucks. Well, how about the Rights Management system? Well in a word, "Customers can go and bite me in the a$$". At least I think that 's the message Sony is trying to get across. Yet another proprietary format, with a heavy emphasis on not actually selling things to customers. All valid documents couple with a license document. The entire purpose of the license file is to cut you off after a certain date. So Sony is not selling you anything. They are "loaning" it to you. Well, after 60 days, let's see if they will return that money I "loaned" them! This new format was supposed to offer advanced compression so that hundreds of books can be stored on your eBook (this many books would cost I estimate 5.2 million dollars). The amazing compression created a single comic book file size of 24 MB. That's only 2 and a half times the size of the built in storage area. Want to keep more than a dozen or so books and you better start hoarding MemorySticks. Lord knows using an Open eBook format or even PDF format would give you the same level of functionality and portability but also give you the problems of ease in handling and widespread compatibility. Wouldn't want that would you?

So for an investment of a few thousand dollars, you can have a crappy collection of books no one reads that will evaporate in a couple of months. Well, at least it's safer than burning money. After all you could burn a finger. Still, the fire sounds more fun than this book.

So the end analysis is that this is a great first step device that showcases some cutting edge technology as well as pointing out that genetically altered monkeys should not be allowed to submit marketing plans for Sony. Until there is a hack out there for personal published documents (like there is for the Rocket Book) this product will go down in Sony's vault for stupid expensive ideas. At least it's so small it should fit. It's getting crowded down there lately.
The possible cure--at least if you're not worried about the DMCA and the black suits

Well, how about the use of a reader that could work with books in nonpropietary formats and thus bypass the greedster-approved reader?

I don't know what the DMCA implications of a full work-around would be--risky, I'd suspect--but in the Comments section of the post, a human reader has already given the Web address of the Sony reader's source code and binaries. "Hopefully," he says, "it won't be long before you can install a more feature-rich ebook reader on the device."

Adds a second human: "I think I speak for many when I say if it doesn't suppport text, HTML and PDF, it isn't worth anything." And then he himself raises an "interesting question." If the Librie is indeed "built on an embedded version of Linux," might "Sony be legally bound by the GPL to publish their code"? That still might not take care of the possible DMCA problem, though. Hollywood-bought copyright law and hobbled tech go hand in hand.

Philips to the rescue?

It'll be interesting to see if Philips' use of E Ink teach is more clueful. So far, in DRM terms, Sony couldn't do worse. Over at Simon & Schuster, an executive once blamed Gemstar's e-book debacle on a "failed business model," and I doubt he's changed his mind. Can't Sony learn?

Details: If Sony is counting on the money from content, then it can simply make two versions of the machine available--one with restrictive DRM and one without it. No free lunch expected here. But no bills for a $200 dinner, either, thank you. One other detail: The picture at the top of this item is a PR shot, not a photo of the reviewer for dottocomu.

More Librie pix and info, via Mike Cane: Click here. Thanks, Mike! People can see a translation via Babelfish if they type in the URL of the Japanese-language page.

Related: The Next Chapter in Electronic Books, in Forbes. Yo, Sony! You'll notice that Forbes says: "If the e-book is going to be a hit, a few things have to happen. First there has to be a good selection of material to read, and, for publishers, that means taking the risk that their best titles may wind up being distributed for free on the Internet." Actually publishers should relish the latter possibility--as long as they receive appropriate compensation through a TeleRead-style national digital library system, which, of course, could help reduce the incentive for piracy.


Sunday, April 25, 2004:
Taming multimedia e-books for the disabled: Boston project offers helpful free software

How to blend pictures and sounds into e-books and not forget the blind, visually impaired and hard of hearing?

The National Center for Accessible Media (NCAM), a joint project of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and WGBH in Boston, has been addressing that issue. Check out the Beyond Text page. Of special interest might be MAGpie 2.01, aka Media Access Generator. It's "a free application from NCAM for creating closed captions and video descriptions for digital multimedia." MAGpie prototypes are available for LIT, PDF and OeB formats.

Also take a look at the handy comparison chart of e-book and digital talking book (DTB) hardware and software to see which formats have the best multimedia-related capabilities right now.

Detail: Geoff Freed, project director for the MAGpie-related activities, is an also an advisory director to the Mid Illinois Digital Talking Books Center efforts. In addition, on July 22, between 4 and 5 p.m. EST, he'll be a guest on the eBookWorm chatcast.

At that time, click here to enter the virtual room with the sessions. If you haven't been there before, a very small audio program will show up on your computer, after which you'll type in your name and hit the return key.

Earlier interview: You can also read or hear an earlier interview with Geoff Freed.


Site Home Page | TeleRead FAQ | Parents | Publishers
Disabled | Elderly | Minorities | US News article

News and Views
More N&V Sites
TeleNews
eBookAd News
PPC eBooks Watch
Copyfight
bIPlog from Berkeley

Lawrence Lessig
Yale LawMeme
The Importance of...
TechDirt
Wired News
Slashdot
Blind Chance
Boing Boing Blog
LISNews


RSS .91

RSS 2.0/PODCAST

Add TeleHeadlines to your Web site for free

Recent Posts

More News and Views
AudioActivism.org
Greensboro101.com
Jerry McClough's NAACP blog
Greensboro Is Talking
Tara Sue Grubb
Ed Cone
Publisher's Lunch
Publisher's Weekly

Dan Gillmor
John Dvorak
MIT Tech Review
New York Times Tech
Lockergnome
Evil Genius

Ernie the Attorney
Luke Francl
Jon Schull
Idiotprogrammer
mistersugar
MaisonBisson.com
Branko Collin
Scholarly E-Publishing
Aaron Schwartz
Gnosium Blog
Andy Oram
E-Media Tidbits
MediaNews
News Is Free
Publishing Weblog
/usr/lib/info
Weblogs.com
Disenchanted
The Buzz Machine

Blogging News

Trend watching
Feedster
Bloglines
BlogPulse
Blogdex
Daypop Top 40 Links
Weblog BookWatch
Eaton Web Portal
Media Metrix

The Lycos 50

Archives