TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home
 Advocating Well-Stocked National Digital Libraries in the United States and Elsewhere

Main Home Page | Web Log Home | Blind/VI Edition | FAQ | Parents | Librarians | Publishers | Disabled | Elderly | Minorities | USN&WR Article

TeleRead calls for well-stocked national digital libraries in the United States and elsewhere. TeleRead's moderator is David Rothman (dr@teleread.org). For occasional highlights from this blog, join the TeleRead Mailing List.


TeleRead FAQ
TeleRead, dating back to the early 1990s, is an evolving proposal. Click here for the basics.

E-books and All That
TeleRead's links to
e-books online

eBook Community List
Electronic Book Web
Project Gutenberg
Distributed Proofreaders
GutenTalk forums and e-book collection
eBookWorm netcast
e-books.org
DLib
Blackmask Online
KnowBetter.com
PulpBits Ebooks
Read/Write Web
ePublishing Blog
mobileread.com
Tenebris
Open Source Novel Project
How TeleRead
could help
bloggers

Library-Related
The Shifted Librarian
Handheld Librarian
American Libraries
Library Journal
Research Buzz
LIS Feeds
Library Stuff
ResourcesShelf
Peter Scott
Catalogablog
Ex Libris
Tinfoil+Raccoon
Alev the Wine Librarian
Open Stacks
Cites & Insights
Librarian Avengers
LibrarianInBlack.net
Free Range Librarian
The Digital Librarian
Rogue Librarian
Librarian.net
LibraryPlanet

Caveat Lector
TechnoBiblio


This site is licensed 

under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license

This 

page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

 
Friday, November 05, 2004:
Before you buy a Librie...

Sony LibrieSven Neuhaus, moderator of the 276-member Librie email list, has posted an informative summary of the negatives of this E-Ink-based machine. He and other Librie enthusiasts are on the way to taming the Librie software so ordinary people can use it to read nonDRMed books.

But commendably he is taking care not to raise prospective buyers' expectations beyond a realistic level.

Before someone spends a lot of time and money on getting a Librie and is disappointed, I wanted to point out the drawbacks I've noticed so far:

--The E Ink display shows a faint "ghost image" of the previous page. You can see it on the picture at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sony_Librie_EBR_1000.jpg
(near the text "Lisa Vogt")

It doesn't really bother me when I read a book, though.

--It's slow to power up. Takes around 30 seconds until you are back reading where you left off. Also, is shuts down after while (unnecessarily if you ask me - the last page should just stay on)

It's also a bit slow to turn pages - around 1 second - only slightly annoying.

--The user interface is Japanese only for now. This includes the windows software, the manuals, Sony support websites, everything.

--The buttons aren't very good.

--The lid is on the wrong side (you can take it off or fold it to the back though).

--The battery usage is good, but not as low as I expected it to be. I suspect reading books stored on a memory stick increases battery drain.

--You can only sync via USB with the power supply connected.

--The DRM issue of course. There's still no way to get nice, rich hypertext on the device (searchable and with links, images and sounds).

Still interested? One source for U.S. buyers--although not necessarily the cheapest, with a $500 price tag--would be Japan-Direct.


PG II Version 2?

The Project Gutenberg Consortia Center, now open in beta, looks like the controversial PG II. Is this PG II Version 2?

PGCCOne rationale for this new site at pgcc.net is that that it can include more books than have made copyright clearance under the original Project Gutenberg. PGCC, described as having "27,000 free eBooks" as of October 27, includes books from Blackmask and other sources beyond PG. Listed as contacts are Michael Hart, founder of the original PG, and John Guagliardo, Michael's Hawaiian friend who was involved with II and earlier set up the World eBook Library. The latter currently offers 60,000 PDF files of books and other items, in addition to the free 27,000 e-books in HTML, for a membership fee of $8.95 a year. Now get this. PGCC describes itself on its home page as "a branch of The World eBook Library Consortia." Hmm. Consortia within consortia?

Business questions

As with PG II, some questions arise as to the business details and the possible diversion of energy away from the original Gutenberg, to which thousands of volunteers have contributed time over the years. An FAQ for PGCC refers to the use of PDF, in addition to HTML. Will this mean another membership arrangement where people pay extra for access to books in proprietary format? And just how much much duplication of various kinds is going on with the original PG? In fact, the About page does address the duplication issue:

The major ideal is to provide public domain access to as many book files as possible, from as many sources as possible, and obviously as the collection of eBooks grows, so too will the duplications of previously released eBooks grow. However, even if we presume this duplication may approach 100%, with the average eBook appearing in two independently catalogued files, that will still mean that of the 50,000 eBooks we hope to provide on opening day, that 25,000 would be unique titles. Of these 25,000 over half were already provided by the original Project Gutenberg collection. Of those ~14,000 it is our pleasure to announce that nearly half of those are provided by The Distributed Proofreaders, located at pgdp.org. We hope you will visit this site and proofread a few pages to keep us growing.
I wish Michael and John luck with the Project Gutenberg Consortia Center despite all the questions raised. I just hope that the new PGCC has been well lawyered and won't harm the original Gutenberg--now under attack from the greedy heirs of Margaret "Good with the Wind" Mitchell.

Copyright issues

The Mitchell heirs claim that Project Gutenberg of Australia, located Down Under, where copyright terms are now longer than here in the United States, is an illegal downloading scheme to let the original Gutenberg circumvent U.S. copyright laws affecting GWTW. I disagree and fervently hope that the orignal Gutenberg and its Aussie friends can succcessfully fend off this harassment. Will the new PGCC help or hurt the public domain movement in dealing with such threats? No conclusions here. But the issue is worth pondering. The About page for PGCC says its "copyright data are not yet sufficient to pass the extreme copyright research required for inclusion in the general Project Gutenberg collection as per copyright requirements in the United States."

In addition, About says: "There will also be Project Gutenberg Consortia Centers for 'life +50,' 'life +70' countries, and hopefully even for 'life +60' countries such as India, Venezuela, etc."

Will these centers be entirely independent of Gutenberg? Are there risks--as a result of Michael's involvement in the PG Consortia Center and the use of the pgcc.net domain--that the bad guys can succeed in their efforts to depict the Australian site as an illegal scheme to violate U.S. copyright? Is there any significance that Michael Hart apparently still personally owns the trademark for Project Gutenberg?

More on copyright

Here is more on the new Consortia Center and the copyright issue, as discussed in a First Project Gutenberg Consortium [sic] Center is open, a Gutenberg press release that Pocket PC eBooks/iPOD Watch has reproduced:
The mission of the Project Gutenberg Consortia Centers: to help people legally exchange eBook collections under the various new copyright laws.

As you may know, different countries had copyright laws change drastically over the last few years, and we hear even more changes are coming at the end of this year.

Therefore, we are making this effort to help those whom these copyright extensions will effect, to insure their continued abilities to provide free eBooks within rules of their new copyright laws; such as many EU countries, and apparently Australia at the end of this year, along with various other changes we will try to help everyone keep up with.
Other questions: It will be interesting to see which other consortia centers spring up, and what business arrangements will be in those cases. Will these franchises be open to all? What will be the qualifications? Kentucky Fried Gutenberg all over again? And just what will be language be on the original Gutenberg's page mentioning partners and affiliates?


Thursday, November 04, 2004:
Latest Microsoft Reader vs. new HP Pocket PC

Doubt the need for OpenReader? The Tower of eBabel is still alive and well; and more than a few e-book users feel crushed under its weight. Here's a gem that Pocket PC Watch eBook/iPOD Watch has just spotted on Usenet.

Please note that latest version 2.3 of Microsoft Reader for Pocket PC is not compatible with the newly released HP iPaq hx4700 Pocket PC (4 inch VGA screen and Windows Mobile 2003SE).

Numerous users - including myself - experienced numerous problems (freeze ups, unresponsive MS Reader menu, inability to highlight text and bring up pop-up menu, etc.) after installing this product.
This, of course, is not the first time that Microsoft couldn't do Reader right and afflicted Pocket PC owners with compatibilty problems. Proprietary technology can get nasty for software companies and hardware companies alike.


King James Bible edition for Tablet PC

"Nelson Bibles is developing a King James Version Bible for the Tablet PC market. With more than 300,000 Tablet PCs in the PDA industry and market projects of 150 percent growth by the end of next year, Nelson Bibles--a division of Nashville-based publisher Thomas Nelson Inc.--is hoping to garner a niche with its digitized Bible that can be downloaded from the Internet." - Nashville Business Journal.

The TeleRead take: Very possibly the pious will also explore e-book titles beyond the Bible. One way or another, this is a boost for the Tablet PC, which, given sales far under expectations, could badly use it. An assocation with e-books can only help.

Assisting Nelson is Zoe Technologies. A press release on the Zoe site quotes Nelson president Michael Hyatt: "Our software will allow users to interact with the Bible in much the same way that they interact with their leather bound version at home–taking notes in the margins, underlying key words and passages–while at the same time offering a comprehensive interactive experience with quick referencing, indexing and search capabilities."

Detail: Is this a flavor of Microsoft Reader or entirely new software? I don't know. On other matter, it's amusing to see the description of the Tablet PC as a PDA.


palmOne said to be considering OS switch: Opening for better e-book-readers?

"Haters are gonna hate, but despite yesterday’s quasi-denial, CNET reports that palmOne has in fact been testing other operating systems for their handhelds and smartphones, including Microsoft’s Windows Mobile software and customized version of Linux. It doesn’t mean that those rumors that palmOne was prepping a Windows Mobile-based Treo are necessarily true…sometimes testing is just testing." - engadget.com, Nov. 4.

The TeleRead take: If Linux happens on the PalmOne, that could be good news for OpenReader. While vendors should watch out for the owners of antique hardware, which OpenReader itself could do through conversion, it is high time to move on to new technology--and new ways of thinking. The older Palm operating systems, at least, could not do justice to a next-generation reader like OpenReader. Then there's the issue of proprietary vs. nonproprietary. In the area of e-reading formats, especially, the proprietary approach is a dead end--given the need for readers to be able to access their books long term without worrying so much about the whims of individual companies.


MPAA file-sharing suit: The e-book angle

"No surprise here, but apparently the MPAA has learned absolutely nothing from the RIAA. After quite a bit of talk, the MPAA has decided to sue about 200 people for offering movies on file sharing networks. I'm sure it will work out just as well as in the recording industry, where file sharing is up these days and shows no sign of slowing down." - Techdirt.

The TeleRead take: E-bookers could learn from the mistakes of both the RIAA and the MPAA. In terms of negative PR risks, e-book-related suits could be worse than for products associated purely with entertainment. How long until the first suit is filed for P2P sharing of a classic novel still under copyright?


Wednesday, November 03, 2004:
Slick print-on-demand gizmo for printing books at home: Now in development

"Someday you may be able to get the latest Harry Potter novel the day it comes out, without leaving your house. You will just plug a blank book into your computer, make an online payment and watch as the pages magically fill up with Harry Potter's latest adventures. The whole transaction will take minutes and the book will look like any other on your shelf." - Small Firm Hopes Its E-Paper Will Turn the Page on E-Book, in the Wall Street Journal Online.

The TeleRead take: One catch is that the first gizmos to allow this at-home verison of print-on-demand will cost more than $1,000. But then regular computer printers were also pretty expensive at first.

Competition

Of course, the technology from 3Netics Corp. of Richmond, Washington, could face stiff competition over the long term--and not just because of cost. One alternative, electronic-paper-style devices with flippable and reusable pages, could display an unlimited number of books, thereby ending concerns over physical storage space. Plus, you could enjoy books this way almost instantly without having to wait to print them out. Great for browsers, the human kind! That's more or less the vision of the Last Book Project, and so far it still looks attainable. Both technologies would have their place.

Meanwhile here are further details from the Wall Street Journal on the interesting 3Netics' project:

David O'Connor, founder and research director of 3Netics Corp., Redmond, Wash., hopes that day will come within two years.

Mr. O'Connor says the electronic paper technology his seven-person firm is developing will revolutionize the publishing industry by eliminating inventory and taking production efficiency to new levels. It's not clear whether 3Netics is the only firm developing this type of technology, but if it works, publishers say, it would be the best thing to happen to electronic publishing, which has so far failed to catch on with consumers.

But it won't be cheap. Mr. O'Connor estimates the blank book, microchip and coatings that are applied to the pages will cost about two cents a page to make, or $4 for the average paperback. But to receive the content, the book has to be plugged into a box that is connected to your computer. That box could cost as much as your computer -- more than $1,000. Right now, it costs less than 50 cents to print a typical 200-page paperback book.

"We're still playing with the chemistry, but it's showing some promising results," Mr. O'Connor said of his printing technology, which he hopes will reshape the $23 billion U.S. book publishing industry.

His research team has found a way to put readable text onto glass microscope slides, and is working on transferring that technology to paper. Mr. O'Connor estimates that a prototype is about three months away, but it will take at least two years before his company finds a way to mass-produce electronic paper, which is unlike anything currently on the market.

Many companies, including Xerox Corp.'s Gyricon unit, Sony Corp. and Philips Electronics NV, have tried their hand at e-books. But the e-books available on the market today haven't posed a threat to paper and ink because readers often complain they are awkward, difficult to use and hard to read in outdoor light. In short, they lack the charming simplicity, ruggedness and durability of a real paper book.

3Netics stumbled on a way to revolutionize printing that could turn e-books into real books through its efforts in nanotechnology. While conducting research using ink-jet printing and self-assembled monolayers that are used to build DNA and proteins, Mr. O'Connor discovered that he could coat a piece of paper with these monolayers and make words appear by sending electrical charges to individual "pixels" on the page, each of which has a unique address.
Who says the e-book industry isn't full of surprises?


Rocket eBook-type devices coming back--from Fictionwise

Gemstar 1150Fictionwise will soon sell rebranded Rocket eBook-style devices, then move on to newer technology.

"This is not a dead end," Steve Pendergrast told a Fictionwise email list, "it's a revival of the entire technology." Yes! Imagine--a dedicated e-book device, coming along just when small-screened cell phones were pushing aside PDAs. Way to go, Fictionwise!

Details

--The devices will at first be "re-branded 1150s," Gemstar devices.

--Price will be $99, including "a $20 store credit for any content you want. We will also be able to migrate 1150, 1200, and 2150 class Gemstar and RCA devices to take content from a new store we will be launching just for this purpose, and we have agreements with major publishers to provide new content for these devices."

--Although offering content in a proprietary format, Fictionwise will also offer users the ability to use their own content--either on launch or soon thereafter.

This hardware revival is is great news for the orphaned owners of the machines, both those who like Gutenberg-style books and those partial to commercial titles from large publishers.

OpenReader angle

So what's the OpenReader angle? Well, just as with the older Palms, it should be possible to convert content in one way or another, as long as the appropriate people help. In the long run, just as the Net surprassed CompuServe, Prodigy and the like, so will an open format prevail over proprietary alternatives.

Fictionwise is a pretty savvy outfit, and one hopes that it will join some rather important e-bookers in support of OpenReader, which will reduce costs for publishers, retailers and, yes, readers. Who wants to pay software companies to reinvent the basic formats and the DRM again and again? Better to have a consortium and compete over features meaningful to writers, pubishers and human readers, such as content-creation tools and easy interfaces in software readers.

Jon Noring and I and others associated with Open Reader hope that Fictionwise will be open to the above. Fictionwise could even simultaneously offer its own format and OpenReader and let the marketplace decide.


Librie wiki to help puzzle out DRM-hobbled machine

From the new Librie Wiki:

The Sony Librié EBR-1000EP is an ebook with a promising new display technology rendered almost unusable by DRM (digital restriction management).

This Wiki serves as a platform to document the Librie's BBeB file format and other features of the device.


Could Kerry-Edwards have won with a gutsy copyright stand?

John Kerry, via Kerry blogWould John Kerry and John Edwards have won if they had taken a gutsy, populist stand on copyright? Consider:

--"Today, more US citizens use file-sharing software than voted for President Bush" in 2000, according to Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

--Ohio, perhaps the decisive state in the 2004 election, is exactly the kind of place where pro-school, pro-library arguments against the copyright elite might have flown.

--The DMCA still threatens to be a monopolist's friend and could jack up the price of goods and services if court decisions go the wrong way. You're GM and don't want small guys to work on your heavily computerized cars? Encrypt, encrypt, encrypt, argue it's necessary, and use the DMCA's anti-circumvention provision.

--The Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act--yes, Sonny Bono Act, not the JFK Act--was and is a systematic transfer of future wealth from society at large to an entertainment elite. Bill Clinton signed it. But a Republican Congress passed it, and clueful Democrats could have said, "Look, we're the party that admits its mistake and lives for the future."

I know: The Dems relied on Hollywood money to pay for much of their advertising. But I doubt that the liberal studio bosses could have brought themselves to support Bush, whose claimed values clashed so directly with theirs. A less tainted Democratic party would have worried less about kowtowing to Hollywood elitists and more about looking for support elsewhere.

Simply put, while copyright could never have been among the most important issues, nothing compared to Iraq or the economy, it might have made a difference in such a hard-fought, narrowly decided election. One frustration is that Kerry actually may have been on the verge of doing the right thing in regard to some intellectual matters. Imagine if he had acted for real, all the way, and in time.

Detail: TeleRead itself is nonpartisan, with some Republicans among its most ardent supporters and no shortage of complaints in this blog against Democratic copyright sleaze. I myself am a lifelong liberal Democrat. I'd love for the headline of this post to be wrong and for Kerry to emerge victorious in the best Truman tradition, but, even after possible court fights, the end results will most likely go against the Democrats. To reach the White House, Kerry would have to win too high a percentage of the contested votes.

Beyond copyright: This eventually could well be the '60s and '70s redux, given the intense hatred of Bush among action-minded kooks, not just the tweedy set. Will we see assassination attempts from Squeaky Frome-style imbeciles and domestic terrorism even without the threat from Osama? I hope not. If it happens, then the Patriot Act could be mild compared to what follows. Should the economy worsen in a serious way, we could also see urban riots. What's more, while the military might hate it, Bush's foreign adventures could leave no other choice, and we could witness a return to the draft and the resultant radicalization of some young people. Bush's hard-line abortion stand, and the resultant selection of Supreme Court justices, also will inflame many. Oh, and I haven't even mentioned the ballooning deficits. Maybe black-suited investment bankers and other harmed by Bushnomics will man the protests marches along with the draft protestors and abortion rights advocates (hyperbole alert). Wait: there's more. Perhaps Bush can make the U.S. even more Republican by letting global warming raise sea levels and do away with Manhattan, thereby ridding us of some bothersome members of the liberal media as well.

More on the overseas angle: Would that this headline have applied to a real-life election: John Kerry storms to victory in virtual vote. It did not because the "virtual vote" included "more than 113,000 people from 119 countries." Not surprisingly, they voted 77 percent for Kerry. Bush does not care as much as Kerry would have about popularity overseas. Osama types may well take note of this and feel more eager than ever to commit yet another 9/11--with repeat efforts against New York, Washington, or both.

Related: Declaring Victory in Dan Gillmor's blog. Quote of the hour: "We will not recognize America in four more years. That will make half of America giddy. It will terrify the other half."


By January: A history e-textbook covering the '04 election

"A supplemental history book set to be published this winter will not only cover the war in Iraq, but the outcome of November's presidential election. By next year, teachers will be able to purchase and download specific exercises in the form of an 'e-book,' tailoring information to one class, or even one student." - Maine Today, via eBookAd.


A 'blognovel': Le Spirale Fantastique

From Rohit Gupta in Bombay--referring to an item I picked up from eBookCulture:

I read the post on Needed: Something 'extra' in e-books. And this is why I'm responding to you. I'm a big fan of Creative Commons, and I think I've devised an original way of publishing a novel that is possible only now due to new technologies and CC. The title of my blognovel is:

LE SPIRALE FANTASTIQUE

If you like a sentence from this novel, tell me about it. I will link that sentence to your blog or website, and you use that quote as a link to my novel on your site. It's a gift-exchange system, and that simple. After this, you own that quote. I own nothing, and nothing owns me.

/////////////////

The TeleRead take: I edited Rohit's note for brevity. While at first glance some would dismiss the blognovel project as a mere link-generating scheme, I believe that Rohit is sincere, the reason I'm reproducing his letter. Good luck to him. Meanwhile see comments from Minding the Planet.


Tuesday, November 02, 2004:
New York Public Library using OverDrive e-book service

New York Public Library e-book collection"It's great, it's cool, they even have a couple of our titles," Michael Ward of Hidden Knowledge has said in an eBook Community List post about the new OverDrive-powered section at the New York Public Library's Web site. "Now if only we could get paid for them."

Let's hope that OverDrive will treat its library clients better than the small publishers toward which it has been a deadbeat. That little detail aside, OverDrive and the New York Public Library are off to a nice start with a colorful, polished and informative home page for e-book readers, as well as a guidance for newbies. Let's hope that clumsy DRM and the format wars don't get in the way. NYPL, like other OverDrive clients, uses a mix of Adobe and Mobipocket. On handhelds, Mobipocket is the best-looking of the major commercial e-book formats.

Detail: The OverDrive collection for the NYPL includes classics that the NYPL could have picked up for free. In fairness to the NYPL, most free versions of public domain books are not presented with the same aesthetics that many commercial editions are. You normally don't get well-done covers of the kind that the NYPL would love to display, for instance. On the positive side, this is an example of how the availability of a work in the public domain does not automatically destroy the commercial market for it. Hidden Knowledge adds genuine value to such oldies as the works of Rafael Sabatini and The Memoirs of General William T. Sherman.

Related: OverDrive Audio Books Platform Released (OverDrive news release) and more details on the OverDrive-NYPL arrangement via EContent.

Additional OverDrive-related comments emailed us by Hidden Knowledge's Michael Ward: "I'd certainly like to put in a good word for Overdrive and all the things they've done right. Steve Potash is a true leader in the field, and I hope the company succeeds."

HK's treatment of PD books: "Our Outlaws of Falkensteig is just what you asked for: a book of uncollected, unavailable, out-of-print stories, with a new intro by Jesse F. Knight, an authority in the field of Sabatini studies. We plan to do two more of these, publishing further uncollected stories by Sabatini, with introductions. We do the scanning, conversions, and formatting for these new collections. We also provide free hosting for RafaelSabatini.com, with minimal ad links, as a gathering ground for Sabatini fans.

"Covers for PD books are a major point with us. Gutenberg doesn't need them, but everyone else does. We agonize over them, and I think ours are among the best in the business. Check out the ones for Magnificat, Strange Seas, the other Yarbro titles, to see what I mean. The original source for the (much modified) picture of Elsinore on Alas, Poor Yorick was a 1902 photo by Burton Holmes, from his travelogue brochure."


'Marxist-Lessigism'

"Computer users of the world have united behind Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig--and what they're doing is much more important than his critics realize." - Summary of Dan Hunter's article Marxist-Lessigism in Legal Affairs.


'Locking Libraries Out of the Digital Loop'

From the Shifted Librarian, Jenny Levine's library blog:

Wow, this is pretty scary. The original post:

"He says that all mobile phones sold in Japan now have some kind of DRM built in. All content (ring tones etc.) is locked to the device it was downloaded first. If you buy a new phone, there is no way to transfer your files from your old one." [Lenz Blog]
The follow-up:
"The paper does point to one way in which even unencrypted content's acquirability might be irrelevant. Many of the phones limit the file types you can play and send to friends. Imagine a phone that can only play encrypted formats. You could download all the MP3s off P2P that you want, but none of them would be usable." [A Copyfighter's Musings]
How do you feel about that? How would a library circulate a digital music or video file in that environment?

I don't know how Japanese libraries work, so I'm curious to know how they are faring in this new no-right-of-first-sale, no-traditional-fair-use-rights digital world. Are libraries already out of the digital loop? Does anyone have a sense of how all of this is playing out over there?


Monday, November 01, 2004:
Reaction to OQO mixed so far

"A full-fledged Windows XP computer that's a fraction of the size of a laptop seems like the answer to the digerati's prayers, but the praise greeting the OQO Model 01 has been decidedly muted." - OQO Is Not Just Another Handheld Device via Reuters.

The TeleRead take: Ideally one trend will hold up. The company has a backlog. Let's see if more than the early adopters snap up the OQO. From afar, at least, it looks promising as an e-book reader for people who don't demand a tablet-sized screen.

Related: Handtops.com's coverage of the OQO.


Sunday, October 31, 2004:
Needed: Something 'extra' in e-books

From eBook Culture:

The Hyperliterature Exchange (found via Tenebris): "Somehow, though, a novel on a computer screen seems much less readable than the same novel in book form. In order to challenge the supremacy of print, an e-text needs to offer something extra"...Continue reading this entry...

The TeleRead take: Interbook linking--even from sentence to sentence--is among my own favorite extras. OpenReader would allow this capability.


Homeland Security threatens Oregon toystore over trademark issue

If thousands of American ever die in another domestic attack by terrorists--I'll optimistically use the "if"--one of the culprits will be the Washington bureaucracy created to spare us further grief.

Dimwits in D.C. have turned the Homeland Security Department loose on so-called intellectual property offenders. Doesn't "Security" have more pressing things to do? How wacky are the priorities of the Bush White House, or at least their people running "Security"! Even John Kerry, beneficiary of millions in political donations from the IP interests, probably wouldn't be this stupid. Whether or not the toystore infringed, is the department the one to safeguard patents, trademarks and copyrights?

Here are details from AP via the Miami Herald:

So far as she knows, Pufferbelly Toys owner Stephanie Cox hasn't been passing any state secrets to sinister foreign governments, or violating obscure clauses in the Patriot Act.

So she was taken aback by a mysterious phone call from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to her small store in this quiet Columbia River town just north of Portland.

"I was shaking in my shoes," Cox said of the September phone call. "My first thought was the government can shut your business down on a whim, in my opinion. If I'm closed even for a day that would cause undue stress."

When the two agents arrived at the store, the lead agent asked Cox whether she carried a toy called the Magic Cube, which he said was an illegal copy of the Rubik's Cube, one of the most popular toys of all time.

He told her to remove the Magic Cube from her shelves, and he watched to make sure she complied.

After the agents left, Cox called the manufacturer of the Magic Cube, the Toysmith Group, which is based in Auburn, Wash. A representative told her that Rubik's Cube patent had expired, and the Magic Cube did not infringe on the rival toy's trademark...
Reminder: TeleRead is a news and advocacy site for well-stocked national digital libraries, not a pro- or anti-Bush site. I'm hoping that loyal Bush supporters will protest the above stupidies. Since when is IP within Homeland Security's logical mission? Perhaps the laws setting up the department will allow threats against toyshops, at least when patents, trademarks and copyrights are actually infringed against. But that doesn't make it right. IP is worth protecting, but is the department the bureaucracy to do it?

Related: Homeland Security enforces trademark laws for expired trademark, in LISNews.


Site Home Page | TeleRead FAQ | Parents | Publishers
Disabled | Elderly | Minorities | US News article

News and Views
More N&V Sites
TeleNews
eBookAd News
PPC eBooks Watch
Copyfight
bIPlog from Berkeley

Lawrence Lessig
Yale LawMeme
The Importance of...
TechDirt
Wired News
Slashdot
Blind Chance
Boing Boing Blog
LISNews


RSS .91

RSS 2.0/PODCAST

Add TeleHeadlines to your Web site for free

Recent Posts

More News and Views
AudioActivism.org
Greensboro101.com
Jerry McClough's NAACP blog
Greensboro Is Talking
Tara Sue Grubb
Ed Cone
Publisher's Lunch
Publisher's Weekly

Dan Gillmor
John Dvorak
MIT Tech Review
New York Times Tech
Lockergnome
Evil Genius

Ernie the Attorney
Luke Francl
Jon Schull
Idiotprogrammer
mistersugar
MaisonBisson.com
Branko Collin
Scholarly E-Publishing
Aaron Schwartz
Gnosium Blog
Andy Oram
E-Media Tidbits
MediaNews
News Is Free
Publishing Weblog
/usr/lib/info
Weblogs.com
Disenchanted
The Buzz Machine

Blogging News

Trend watching
Feedster
Bloglines
BlogPulse
Blogdex
Daypop Top 40 Links
Weblog BookWatch
Eaton Web Portal
Media Metrix

The Lycos 50

Archives