|
TeleRead calls for well-stocked national digital libraries in the United States and elsewhere. TeleRead's moderator is David Rothman (dr@teleread.org). For occasional highlights from this blog, join the TeleRead Mailing List.
TeleRead FAQ
TeleRead, dating back to
the early 1990s, is an evolving
proposal. Click here for the
basics.
E-books and All That
TeleRead's links to
e-books online
eBook Community
List
Electronic Book Web
Project
Gutenberg
Distributed
Proofreaders
GutenTalk forums and e-book collection
eBookWorm netcast
e-books.org
DLib
Blackmask Online
KnowBetter.com
PulpBits Ebooks
Read/Write Web
ePublishing Blog
mobileread.com
Tenebris
Open Source Novel Project
How TeleRead
could help
bloggers
Library-Related
The
Shifted Librarian
Handheld Librarian
American Libraries
Library Journal
Research Buzz
LIS Feeds
Library
Stuff
ResourcesShelf
Peter Scott
Catalogablog
Ex
Libris
Tinfoil+Raccoon
Alev the Wine Librarian
Open Stacks
Cites & Insights
Librarian Avengers
LibrarianInBlack.net
Free Range Librarian
The Digital Librarian
Rogue
Librarian
Librarian.net
LibraryPlanet
Caveat Lector
TechnoBiblio
|
|
Saturday, January 29, 2005:
Cybook passes Raccoon's screen test, but complexity annoys her
Rochelle Hartman, the Raccoon of the Tinfoil+Raccoon blog, is trying out a Cybook, and she can easily read Bob Dylan's new autobiography off the screen.
So much for Prof. Geoffrey Nunberg's silly comparison between e-book reading and touring Normandy by looking through a bombsight. Reading off a computer screen, Rochelle says, "um, like you're doing now," is not "unnatural." My friend, a librarian in the Midwest, writes: "I didn't even give a second thought to the medium once I launched into one of the best-written, most compelling books I've picked up in a long time."
The bad news
OK. I figured I'd be gentle and break Rochelle's good news first. The main point of her post, with which I agree, is that today's e-book technology can often scare off civilians. In a related vein, my Cybook review recommended the machine for "serious readers" but not necessarily the whole universe.
Gemstar-style devices, at least, would be easier for novices. In allowing users to try different programs to cope with the Tower of eBabelor just find the software they liked best, the Cybook's makers pleased me. But they complicated life for e-book novices. The best machines for David--and, yes, I still love the Cybook--aren't necessarily the best for Rochelle right now.
DRM horrors galore
Rochelle especially hated the hassles of DRM even though she got started with Mobipocket, which, compared to Microsoft and Adobe counterparts, is far gentler on users. I doubt that the DRM of Mobipocket on the Cybook is worse than on other machines. Either way, though, you have to type in an all-too-long string of numbers and put up with other nonsense in homage to the DRM gods.
"I spoke with IT-savvy, totally wired folks about ebooks," Rochelle recalls from an ALA conference, "and was surprised when they shrugged their shoulders and dismissed the possibililty that ebooks had a shot at becoming an ubiquitous medium. When I asked why, their main answer was 'DRM.'"
ActiveSync joys
The joys of the ever-changing ActiveSync (sarcasm alert), which Cybook uses must download for the latest version, also didn't agree with the Raccoon.
"Cybook is a multi-format, book-sized reader, which is good," Rochelle said, "but it takes a tech contortionist to wiggle the content into the hardware. Hot sync, mobipocket reader, USB cables, blah blah blah."
I've encouraged Rochelle to buy a memory card reader to ease the pain from ActiveSync transfers, and beyond that, I believe that she'll eventually appreciate the advantages of the Cybook for seasoned e-book nuts. Still, her point remains; there's just too much complexity here for novices. You've got to be a newbie, alas, before the seasoning seeps in.
Earth to Microsoft
Hello, Microsoft? When will you start designing your ActiveSync software for Earthlings? It's a shame that innocents like Rochelle and the Cybook people must suffer because of the built-in horrors of Windows CE and the rest. Worred about embedded Linux? Then, Softies, please fix ActiveSync. As a usuable program for civilians, it is totally broken.
On top of everything else, the Cybook still can't run Microsoft Reader even though the Windows CE operating system is billg-holy. Far from clueless, the folks at Bookeen, home of the Cybook, know what's going on, and they are vigrous supporters of OpenReader. What's more, they are in negotiations with Microsoft to remedy the Microsoft Reader problem. Bookeen is working to get Adobe on the Cybook (apparently not with DRM), and a Cybook review from ZDnet says: "The company also tells us that a version of eReader, which can read DRMd PDB format files, is being developed for the Cybook." That's great. Let's help readers cope with the Here Now while awaiting the OpenReader solution.
One answer to the sync problem: f I have my druthers, the OpenReader Consortium will address the download problem to reduce the cortortionist requirement. Perhaps by encouraging the development of alternatives to ActiveSync and HotSync for Windows and other operating systems? Or maybe integrating downloading into the actual reader program? No promises! That's just my opinion. What do you think? Email me. If there's enough demand for this feature, then, yes, it just might well show up.
Latest on OpenReader: An accomplished network security expert is joining our effort and will be especially helpful in the DRM Department. While Jon Noring and I and other ringleaders are not the biggest fans of DRM, we're prepared to be as Raccoon-friendly with it as we can in OpenReader.
Update, 12:50, Jan. 29: From Norway, Thomas Brevik wrote Rochelle earlier today: "We have just purchased four Cybooks for our library and are in the first stages of setting them up before we start lending them out to our users. I'm really looking forward to your experiences and opinions on the Cybook. Personally I'm quite happy with the reading experience, and our IT-department will do most of the tech stuff anyway so hopefully we'll avoid the problems you had. Good luck!"
posted by David Rothman at 7:07 AM | permanent link
Uppity Googler's posts brought back--via Yahoo cache
Friday, January 28, 2005:
Librie successor on the way?
The Rothman Librie is due to arrive next week. The cost in Japan was 29,800 JPY, around $290, and at that price I couldn't care less whether the E-Ink marvel is new or a refurb. Good thing, too--for the latest scuttlebutt, via my new pal Morpheus at MobileRead, is that 29,800 is what a refurb seems to cost. Is that what I'm getting? Just why the R word--and I don't mean "Rothman"? Could Sony be about to intro a new model without such heinous DRM? Alexander, a MobileRead contributor, is thinking that, and he could be on to something.
Also from Morpheus: Word that apparently "someone managed to write some code to read e-books (in .jpg format) on a Sony Playstation Portable."
posted by David Rothman at 6:03 AM | permanent link
Chutzpah Department: Adobe on usability
If you enjoy corporate Newspeak, you'll love an interview with Adobe COO Shantanu Narayan, complete with a few musings related to the U word. Oh, this is just what we need--proprietary craziness and the Tower of eBabel as the eternal norm on portable devices. Heck, Adobe can't even get PDAs right. (Via NewsScan as spotted by Rick Barry.)
posted by David Rothman at 3:47 AM | permanent link
Thursday, January 27, 2005:
Yet another Adobe e-book nightmare
Don't believe that Adobe is poison for the e-book industry? Well, check out this Gothic-intense nightmare from Beth Young, which is just one of many Adobe-related horror stories. She writes:
I needed Robert's Rules of Order in order to deal with a problem on a faculty senate committee. My copy was at home, I was in the office, and I didn't have time to travel to the library or bookstore, obtain a copy, travel back to my office, and deal with the RRO problem before my meeting. No problem, I thought, I'll buy an e-copy. I'm sure I can find one and download it in minutes..
I figured it was worth owning an e-copy in addition to my print copy because I could keep RRO handy on my pda at every committee meeting and eventually become that crotchety faculty member who brings all business to a halt by saying things like, "No, no, no! You must not discuss that motion until it has been seconded!" Sadly, the latest version of RRO is only available in Secure Adobe format. I hadn't yet downloaded Adobe Reader (I hate cluttering up my pda memory), but I do get a slight discount here because I'm a member of the BuyWise club. Also, a former grad school prof has just written a book that's available in Secure Adobe format, so maybe I would purchase that book, too. Next step: download the software. I located the free Adobe Reader 2.0 software and tried to install it on my pda. After working for 5-10 minutes, the installer informed me that it had failed because I had Adobe Acrobat 1.0 already installed on my ppc. I was told to uninstall Acrobat using my ppc Remove Programs feature. So, I ran Remove Programs, and Acrobat was quickly uninstalled except for a few files/folders that I was instructed to remove using File Explorer. I removed those files and folders, confirmed that Adobe Acrobat appeared in no menus whatsoever on my pda. Check. Tried again to install Adobe Reader. This time I got a message telling me I had to UNinstall the Reader from my desktop, where had installed itself first before trying to go to my pda. OK--did that. Then, again I tried to install Reader. Again, I got an error message because supposedly Acrobat was on my pda. Again, I checked for evidence of the program on my pda and found none. People, this cycle happened THREE MORE TIMES. I never was able to solve it. Thank goodness I'd never actually purchased that e-book! I'd have wasted my $9.34. Finally, in my remaining few desperate moments before my meeting, I called my husband, interrupting something important to make him search the house for my book and look up the information I needed. Fortunately he was able to rescue me . . . and my committee problem was eventually solved. So there you have it. I recognized the ideal situation for an e-book, I readied my credit card to make the purchase, and instead all I got was a techno-hassle. Plus I no longer have Adobe Acrobat on my pda, so I will be cursing again when I need it and have to reinstall. Assuming that the installer doesn't also insist it is still there... What is Adobe trying to do--sabotage e-books with its installation horrors? Not to mention its PDA-hostile format and DRM. User-friendly standards could go a long way in both the format and related DRM areas. Standards would also open up more competition among creators of e-book readers, so products would improve, installation would be less of a chore, and stories like Beth's would be less common.
Related: The riddles of Microsoft. Just where does Adobe hire its product managers? Obviously from the same Martian territories that Microsoft's people do, at the expense of usability by earthlings.
By the way, if you click on Beth's original item, you'll also read about her pain with e-books in the Microsoft format. Any wonder that global revenue from e-books is under $40 or $50 million a year?
posted by David Rothman at 9:59 AM | permanent link
'Wouldn't It Be Nice If You Could Correct The Encyclopedia Britannica?'
A gem from Techdirt:
You may recall that we somehow got involved in a bizarre battle over Wikipedia, when I got into a discussion with a reporter who told me that Wikipedia was "outrageous," "repugnant" and "dangerous," mainly because it's not reviewed by "professionals." Despite a valiant effort, I was unable to ever convince the reporter, Al Fasoldt, that regular encyclopedias, complete with their experts, make mistakes too--and, in fact, the problem is that those encyclopedias can't then be updated and fixed. In a story that was pretty much written to make Wikipedia fans gleeful, Many to Many points out that a 12-year-old boy has found a series of errors in the latest Encyclopedia Britannica. It may be wrong, but of course, it's not "dangerous" because it's been reviewed by experts. Apparently, certified false info is better than uncertified correct info.
* * *
The TeleRead take: At least in print, the Encyclopedia Britannica is inherently inaccurate compared to the Wikipedia--simply because it can't be updated as often as a distributed approach with volunteers. The best solution would be a mix of diligent, ever-vigilant amateurs and pros.
posted by David Rothman at 4:29 AM | permanent link
Ethan Frome and Optimist's Daughter audios now online
Indian Luddite
You already know about the benefits that e-books could bring to the Third World. Too bad that West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadev Bhattacharjee is so clueless about print vs. electronics. Books are books regardless of the medium.
Related: Date of Al Gore's e-library quote--and other uppity questions about the Stanford Lud's rant.
posted by David Rothman at 4:20 AM | permanent link
The pros and cons of virtual reference
Might the typical library be better off without IM and other features of a virtual refrence desk--and perhaps simply beef up phone services? Three articles of interest:
--To Chat Or Not to Chat—Taking Another Look at Virtual Reference, Part 1, by Steve Coffman and Linda Arret, in Information Today.
--To Chat Or Not to Chat—Taking Another Look at Virtual Reference, Part II, by the same authors.
--Virtual Reference: Alive & Well, by Brenda Bailey-Hainer, in LibraryJournal.
Could it be that people want a break from their electronic activities--a chance to hear a human voice?
posted by David Rothman at 3:47 AM | permanent link
The riddles of Microsoft
One of the mysteries of Microsoft is how so much money can go for R&D with so little to show in the way of true innovation. Part of the problem, of course, is that Microsoft worries about cannibalizing existing products--or not fitting in with various grand visions. Then there's the issue of whether nutty innovators can be compatibly crazy with BillG and those in his cult. But could some of the problem also be Microsoft's hiring methodology? Might there be a little too much emphasis on riddles and puzzles that often have little to do with the tasks envisioned for the prospective hire?
Detail: This might also explain why Microsoft interfaces often suck. Regardless of all the beta testing in the world, Martians are not always successful at designing for earthlings. We're talking about misdirected anality in the extreme--the same kind that had led Microsoft to care more about DRM than about user-friendly e-books.
Microsoft Reader as a riddle: Microsoft has so cunningly hidden some of the most useful features from users of the Pocket PC version--for example, the capability to switch back o the scrollbar after you've turned it off. Mobipocket, a better reader, has that problem, too, in the PPC version.
Fairness Department: The Open Source community and public domain communities don't get off the hook. Too often the hardcore techies prevail over the other volunteers at the expense of usability.
posted by David Rothman at 3:39 AM | permanent link
Wednesday, January 26, 2005:
'Folksonomy': A new buzzword defined--and a concept attacked
Remember our earlier item on social bookmarking? Well, here's a related buzzword--folksonomy, complete with a definition in an oh-so-apt place: the Wikipedia:
Folksonomy is a neologism for a practice of collaborative categorization using simple tags. This feature has begun appearing in a variety of social software. At present, the best examples of online folksonomies are social bookmarking sites like del.icio.us, a bookmark sharing site, Flickr, for photo sharing, and 43 Things, for goal sharing. Gmail's labeling system is somewhat similar to the use of tags, but it is not a folksonomy because users cannot share their categorizations. Folksonomy is not directly related to the concept of faceted classification from library science. Folksonomy is currently understood somewhat narrowly as "tagging". Social sciences and anthropology have long studied "folk classifications" - how average people (non-experts) classify the world around them. Check out Harold Conklin’s (1972) Folk Classification: A Topically Arranged Bibliography of Contemporary and Background References Through 1971... Already "Folksonomy" is under attack. I myself love the concepts for libraries as long as people can also limit themselves to traditional alternatives. What a way to keep library catalogs timely.
posted by David Rothman at 5:19 AM | permanent link
How e-books could helpThird World literature and TW society in general
E-books and other electronic media will be able to help boost basic literacy in isolated jungle, desserts and mountainous regions--as wireless technology takes off and hardware costs plummet. But what about the development of genuine literature?
The planet is now missing out on the talents of thousands of potential novelists and playwrights in remote regions who have truly lived the lives they describe. E-books and the Net could be one way to help educate them early on, no matter where they lived. The best way to become a good writer, of course, is to be a good reader; and e-books and online communities can play a role to play even if they are not panaceas. Used e-book readers are going for $60 on eBay, and new ones fit for remote use will eventuallycost $20. It's just a matter of enough demand to crank up enough production lines to
"Hollow books" and the authenticity issue
But back to the words "truly lived." For some musings on the authenticity issue among some of the Third World's existing novelists, read The library of hollow books, a column by New Delhi's Nilanjana S. Roy in the Business Standard.
Sample: "Bajwa, Suri and Swarup appropriate the lives of people whom they do not understand; unlike Bibhutibhushan, who lived Apu's life of deprivation in the city and the village, unlike Mulk Raj Anand, who saw at first hand what the humiliations of an untouchable encompassed, they are at a remove from their subjects."
Culture and empathy
Genuine empathy issue could be more than a little useful. If Third World literature became more accessible in the wealthy countries via the Net, the rewards for developing nations could extend beyond the wallets of the authors themselves. Culture of all kinds, especially the Net-transmittable variety, such as e-books, can humanize the inhabitants of the Third World for the First World elite. Perhaps a few of its members will be more willing to help long term--not just during tsunami season. Too often, alas, exposure to Third World people comes on the Net in the form of spam for Nigerian scams. The right e-books piped into the homes of present and future policy-makers could undo at least some of the damage.
The need for balance
At the same time, I'm not suggesting that electronic libraries neglect the best of Western literature--in fact, anyone's. In Outwitting History, Aaron Lansky of the National Jewish Book Center tells how a New Jersey library was ridding itself of old Yiddish books because local demographics had changed. To me, that is a preview of what could well happen someday even to "mainstream" Western literature--as America changes racially and ethnically. E-libraries, of course, with their unlimited storage space and ease of distribution, are among the more efficient ways of preserving and promoting everyone's literature.
Related: With or without electronic libraries, the planet needs teachers and librarians. I see that some budget-crazed politicians in Philadelphia are yanking librarians out of libraries, unwittingly hastening the process of turning America into a Third World country in the worst way.
(Roy article found via LISNews. Above TeleRead item revised substantially on Jan. 28, 2004)
posted by David Rothman at 2:44 AM | permanent link
'The past of the future of RSS'
Responding to Richard MacManus' speculation on future possibilities for RSS, programmer Philip Dorrell dropped me a note with the subject line of "The past of the future of RSS." Miski: A White Paper contains some interesting RSS-type thoughts from five years ago: Miski: A White Paper. And meanwhile here's some RSSish history., along with the requisite Wikipedia item.
posted by David Rothman at 2:11 AM | permanent link
Tuesday, January 25, 2005:
Audio e-books a hit at Georgia library
Audio e-books seem to be taking off at the Hall County Library System in Georgia. (Via the Gainesville Times.)
posted by David Rothman at 3:12 PM | permanent link
Pros and cons of ebooks: A Spanish-language perspective
CanalPDA.com, a Spanish-language publication, has summed up the pros and cons of ebooks. The list should be instructive, especially for DRM fanatics:
Pros: (1) Convenience, (2) compactness, (3) privacy (harder for others to see what you're reading) and (4) completeness (can include audio interview with writer, for example).
Cons: (1) price gouges, which tend to favor publishers rather than writers, (2) not enough in languages other than English, (3) not enough titles in e-book format in general, and (4) DRM systems that range from "annoying" to "the ridiculous."
(Found via LISNews.)
posted by David Rothman at 2:56 PM | permanent link
E-books could benefit from new breakthrough: bendable OLEDs
"Kyoto University and three major Japanese firms said Tuesday they have jointly developed a new type of organic electroluminescent display panel that can be bent like paper. The business card-sized prototype display was developed by Kyoto University in cooperation with Mitsubishi Chemical Corp., Pioneer Corp. and Rohm Co." - Kyodo News Service.
The TeleRead take: Kyoto's display tech will even show color. Imagine the benefits for electronic books and other publications. Let's hope that future news will be good in terms of cost and screen size and in in other regards. Who knows, will 21st century fashion include a New York Times Shirt with a display built into the sleeve? More details:
The business card-sized prototype display was developed by Kyoto University in cooperation with Mitsubishi Chemical Corp., Pioneer Corp. and Rohm Co.
The new technology will make it possible to create low-cost, lightweight, soft and irrefrangible displays that can cover curved surfaces of automobile bodies and other products, the developers said.
Specifically, it is expected to be used in such new products as flexible displays for mobile equipment, as well as electronic books, newspapers and posters, they said.
Naturally all these miracles are unfolding just when Librie prices have dropped enough to encourage me to get one, which is on the way from Japan. Could all the wonders be among the reasons why Sony isn't introducing the Librie in the States?
Given the possible ruggedless of new displays and related hardware, the day may indeed come when one can defy the predictions even of Arthur Clarke--and read e-books and newspapers in the bathtub, even without protective coverings such as the Otter Box.
posted by David Rothman at 10:35 AM | permanent link
Mr. ContentGuard's defense of proprietary DRM
"Content owners don't want to be constrained and neither do end users, but everyone in the middle wants DRM to be proprietary. And that's one of the reasons that we don't see a single trust model used for DRM," ContentGuard CEO Michael Miron the CEO as quoted in ContentGuard talks DRM futures, in the Register.
The TeleRead take: So who's in the middle--copyright lawyers paid by the software giants? Oh, well, at least Miron is admitting that end users don't like to be "constrained." Exactly. Consumers can tolerate some inconvenience--but not the level that has contributed to the horrid showing of e-books so far. A truly universal DRM standard for e-books could go a long way. The other issue is that a nonproprietary or semiproprietary approach would actually be more secure with more people licking the tires.
posted by David Rothman at 9:02 AM | permanent link
Monday, January 24, 2005:
Mystery by mail: A DRM alternative for suitable works?
"'Daughters of Freya' is a gripping, fun mystery novel that takes the form of a series of emails between the players in the story. The book is delivered in daily installments to your inbox, as though you were intercepting the characters' mail." - Mystery novel delivered in email installments, an item spottted at Boing Boing.
The TeleRead take: $7.49 is a bit much for a novella-length text, but as Cory Doctorow points out, this at least prolongs the pleasure over several weeks. You don't just see text. The publisher says: "The Daughters of Freya also includes links to newspaper and magazine articles, detective reports, photographs and other items that contain clues to the mystery."
One possibility as a DRM alternative for suitable works? Yes, you can copy or forward the emails, but it's far harder to pirate this book in one swoop than as a single file. Who knows, maybe Dickens-style serialization will make a comeback among certain novelists.
Cory, by the way, loved the book, which you can buy here.
posted by David Rothman at 4:20 AM | permanent link
Chinese copyrighting ancient images
What would Confusius think of this? In Virtual treasures get real protection, the Web site of People's Daily says: Digital technology is being used to conserve the Mogao Grottoes of Dunhuang, in Northwest China's Gansu Province.
The "Digital Dunhuang" project, which aims to pool all the treasures from Dunhuang, has also paid close attention to protect its intellectual property rights (IPR) in the digital era.
The Dunhuang Academy, solely authorized by the Chinese Government as the official institute in charge of the protection, research and management of treasures in the Dunhuang grottoes, has announced that it holds all rights to images of the ancient treasures under Chinese IPR laws.
It has obtained copyrights to digital images of the murals, statues and documents from Dunhuang's grottoes.
No other entity, business or institution, can reproduce, transmit or display the images of Dunhuang in any form without the consent of the right holder... Just what we need to presereve and encourage the spread of culture, eh? (Sarcasm alert.)
posted by David Rothman at 3:16 AM | permanent link
The future of RSS
"Here's a prediction from me on the future of RSS: in the not too distant future, more people will subscribe to topic/tag/remix feeds than feeds of actual people. Is that a scary thought?" - Remixing and Speculation on The Future of RSS, in Read/Write Web from Richard MacManus.]
The TeleRead take: Richard could well be on to something. I especially like his comments on the tag-related spam threat. Meanwhile, wittingly or not, a Nevada casino is spamming the RSS-based Feedster's listings for the term "ebooks."
posted by David Rothman at 2:35 AM | permanent link
Sunday, January 23, 2005:
The Apple-Hollywood alliance--and the implications for e-books on the iPOD
So what happens if tech companies pal around more and more with movie studios and publishing giants? Just what could this mean for e-books? Suppose techie tycoons make the same kind of anti-consumer link between tech specs and content that Billg did--in trying to Windowize e-books with Microsoft Reader? Actually, in Apple's case, the time has long been "now." We could well see a heavily DRMed Apple format for e-books on the iPOD unless "the rest of us" speak up.
As the proprietary iTunes and other products show, Steve Jobs is really cut from the same cloth as Gates. What's more, in some ways, he isn't just a friend of Hollywood. Via Pixar, he is Hollywood. And now consider our being at the mercy of a Hollywood-tech alliance, Jobs style, and suffering similar horrors with Apple-only e-books. Here's what Robert X Cringley wrote in Mini Me: The New Mac Mini is All About Movies:
...at midnight my computer stopped playing Apple movie trailers. The only way to watch QuickTime movie trailers (the closest I get to a movie since we have little kids) was suddenly through iTunes 4.7, which takes you straight through the iTunes Music Store. The regular QuickTime player wouldn't work. Apple had made no announcements, nor had they upgraded QuickTime, so I'd say it was a glitch that presaged the eventual replacement of that player for the selling of movies. Since then Apple fixed things and the QuickTime player now works for playing trailers, but I had already seen the future. Yes, so we know that it was a glitch, but, wait, there's more:
Now go back to Steve's MacWorld performance, which you can see on the Apple web site. What the heck is Mr. Ando of Sony doing there? Nominally he's sharing the stage to herald the ability of Apple's new iMovie 5.0 to import high definition video from a new Sony consumer HD camcorder. Apple will also be selling the Sony camcorder online and in its stores. But you don't get the head of Sony at your event just to sell camcorders. And Jobs explained it himself -- it is the "Year of HD" and nearly all of the year is yet to come. As he darkly hinted, we can expect further announcements.
It is simple to say that Apple hopes to repeat with video the success it already has with iPod and iTunes. Jobs denies interest in video, citing the dominance of cable companies, but then he always denies right up until the moment he changes his mind, and that moment is coming.
If Apple hopes to emulate its iPod/iTunes success, what does that mean? It means selling hardware devices and proprietary content to play on those devices. The first such hardware device is probably the Mini. And the proprietary content will be video encoded in AVC H.264, which will be supported first in OS X 10.4, promised for the second quarter of this year. So Apple can't announce that it is in the movie distribution business until 10.4 (code-named Tiger) is available.
Remember Steve said this is the Year of HD. So one could expect that any video sold by Apple would be in high definition format. That gets around the supposed cable monopoly (there is no HD monopoly) and is suitably proprietary that Apple ought to be able to enforce its Digital Rights Management system. Notice? Its DRM system. Goes hand in hand with proprietary formats. If DRM must happen, let it at least be a standard used with format standards--whether in movies, books or anything else--to reduce the chances of gouges. Remember, Microsoft charges more than 15 percent in some cases for use of DRMed LIT for e-books. Sooner or later, will Jobs hope to do the same through control over a format for e-books on an iPod-style device?
What's fascinating is that Sony is already using an essentially proprietary and heavily DRMed format for the Librie (despite the much-welcome capability that Sony has added for the Librie to be able to work with ASCII, HTML and other popular formats). What happens if Sony's DRM and proprietary bent clash with the same at Apple? Not the best news for consumers and content providers eager to see the end of the Tower of eBabel in various media. OpenReader, anyone?
Related: I asked a friend of mine about e-books as discussed informally an ALA convention. Guess what one of the major negatives was--as cited by librarian geeks. The DRM mess, of course. That's something for other digital librarians to consider in thinking about personal digital libraries on the iPOD. What's really scary is that Apple someday could do an e-book version of its iPOD war with outfit like Virgin Mega and RealNetworks. Meanwhile enjoy the non-Apple e-books on your iPOD. No telling what Jobs might do to these alternatives in the future.
(Cringley piece found via Slashdot. Jobs photo from Apple. Taken by Moshe Brakha.)
posted by David Rothman at 8:19 AM | permanent link
Rental rights set back in Japan
Will the U.S. really be better off if we keep trying to "harmonize" our copyright laws with those in other countries? Japan is a wonderful negative example. A new law menaces book rental shops and libraries. (Via Andreas Bovens' blog.)
posted by David Rothman at 3:40 AM | permanent link
Bush: A 'stealth' Internet president?
James Fallows notes that George Bush for the most part has stuck to the Clinton administration's goals of getting free information on the Net and CD, or at least avoiding European-level gouges. In a New York Times column headlined Bush Didn't Invent the Internet, but Is He Good for Tech?, Fallows writes:
There is a long historical background to the administration's choices, plus a variety of recent shifts and circumstances. The history stretches to the early days of the republic, and the idea that government-sponsored research in science and technology could bolster private business growth. Progress in farming, led by the land-grant universities, demonstrated this concept in the 19th century. Sputnik-era science, culminating in the work that led to the Internet, did the same in the 20th century. In the last two decades, this old idea has been dressed up with concepts like "network economics" and "increasing return to scale." The results include the widely accepted understanding that the relationship of public science and private business is more important than ever. An environment in which the exchange of information is timely and inexpensive, rather than slow and costly, can foster the growth of many industries. That sounds obvious. But it has political consequences. For one, it helps explain why the United States has been so fertile an incubator for tech companies, compared with most of Europe: government-sponsored information has been much cheaper here. (The United States government sells a CD set containing all weather readings taken in the last 50 years for $4,290; the German government data costs $1.5 million.) American dynamism also creates an ever-changing set of winners and losers. In fostering many new companies, the government often dislodges a few old ones; dealing with the resulting protests is each administration's problem. Would that the Bush administration applied the same logic and ignored the copyright crybabies out of Hollywood! Needless to say, a well-stocked national digital library system (with fair compensation for copyright holders) would also help.
posted by David Rothman at 2:56 AM | permanent link
Washington Post fails to fix copyright gaffe: "Journalistic ethics" as an oxymoron
The Washington Post so far has apparently failed to fix a Dylan-related copyright gaffe that I brought to ombudsman Michael Getler's attention. Anyone spot a correction of the misuse of the phrase "public domain"? My search of the Post archives has seemingly failed to uncover one.
When it comes to coverage of copyright law and technology, all the pieties about "journalistic ethics" can go out the window. The phrase is even more of an oxymoron than "military intelligence." Post-style cluefulness about technology too often means such acts of brilliance as getting Bill Gates' wife on the corporate board--perhaps an eventual prelude to a Microsoft buyout of the Post Company, despite all the rhetoric that the Graham family may utter about journalistic independence. I wouldn't mind Melinda's serving on the board if the newsies were smarter about copyright laws, Draconian DRM and the rest. But for the most part--yes, some outstanding exceptions exist--they're not. Bad career move.
E-books often get the same loving treatment in the press as the cause of balanced copyright law does. Digital books are a topic that a responsible mainstream publication needs to avoid except in a negative context (sarcasm alert). The L.A. Times and its syndicate are refusing to publish a rewritten p-version of my reply to the grossly misleading article that Geoffrey Nunberg wrote on e-books. I didn't do a puff job, but rather pointed out the possibilities if the industry can overcome its eBabel and DRM challenges.
Look, the L.A. Syndicate in the past has distributed me--an article I wrote on Star Wars, a topic on which I was just a fraction as knowledgeable as on e-books. Why won't the Times give e-books a break? I don't think it's a question in this case of orders from on high--the dinos would rather not mess with all the details of grubby technology. Let's hope that some more positive coverage in the New York Times wasn't a fluke.
The dinos' pocketbooks
It's gonna hurt the dinos in the pocketbook if Luddites prevail in the newsrooms--and I don't just mean the Post and the L.A. Times. Here are results from a Techdirt poll to which 745 people as of this writing have replied.
Do you still read a paper newspaper?
I get it and read it every day: 245 / 27%
I pick one up every once in a while: 232 / 25%
I have a legacy subscription that piles up: 27 / 3%
Nope. I get everything from the internet: 206 / 22%
Nope. I get my news from the internet and TV: 165 / 18%
Paper? How modern! Real news is carved in stone: 23 / 1% Get it, Post? Get it, L.A. Times? The times, they are a-changin'.
Related: The Meaning of “Public Domain”, in the Free Culture Blog.
posted by David Rothman at 1:56 AM | permanent link
Site Home
Page |
TeleRead FAQ |
Parents |
Publishers
Disabled |
Elderly |
Minorities |
US News article |

News and Views
More N&V Sites
TeleNews
eBookAd News
PPC eBooks Watch
Copyfight
bIPlog from Berkeley
Lawrence Lessig
Yale LawMeme
The Importance of...
TechDirt
Wired
News
Slashdot
Blind Chance
Boing Boing Blog
LISNews
RSS .91
RSS 2.0/PODCAST
Add TeleHeadlines to your Web site for free
Recent Posts
More News and Views
AudioActivism.org
Greensboro101.com
Jerry McClough's NAACP blog
Greensboro Is Talking
Tara Sue Grubb
Ed Cone
Publisher's Lunch
Publisher's Weekly
Dan Gillmor
John
Dvorak
MIT Tech Review
New York Times Tech
Lockergnome
Evil Genius
Ernie the Attorney
Luke Francl
Jon Schull
Idiotprogrammer
mistersugar
MaisonBisson.com
Branko Collin
Scholarly E-Publishing
Aaron Schwartz
Gnosium Blog
Andy Oram
E-Media Tidbits
MediaNews
News Is Free
Publishing Weblog
/usr/lib/info
Weblogs.com
Disenchanted
The Buzz Machine
Blogging News
Trend watching
Feedster
Bloglines
BlogPulse
Blogdex
Daypop Top 40 Links
Weblog BookWatch
Eaton Web Portal
Media Metrix
The Lycos 50
Archives
|