<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking e-books vs. p-books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2006/09/15/rethinking-e-books-vs-p-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2006/09/15/rethinking-e-books-vs-p-books/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amol</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2006/09/15/rethinking-e-books-vs-p-books/comment-page-1/#comment-586279</link>
		<dc:creator>Amol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=5504#comment-586279</guid>
		<description>Quinn, I would switch over entirely to e-books if I could get my hands on a relatively &lt;i&gt; inexpensive &lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt; high-quality &lt;/i&gt; e-book reader.  Ultimately, I find myself simply printing them out onto paper.  That is, perhaps, the biggest drawback to e-books at present.

However, I think there is something to your argument--e-book readers could learn something from how people use "p-books."  In particular, I would like to see e-book readers with multi-touch interface, so that I can flip or flick pages across the screen.  Moreover, a screen without glare would be nice!

The closer the e-book reading experience becomes to that of p-books, the more people will make the switch.  However, until that comes along, I'll continue to try and find free printing venues to print those e-books out onto paper.  It sure beats paying $100+ for a textbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quinn, I would switch over entirely to e-books if I could get my hands on a relatively <i> inexpensive </i> and <i> high-quality </i> e-book reader.  Ultimately, I find myself simply printing them out onto paper.  That is, perhaps, the biggest drawback to e-books at present.</p>
<p>However, I think there is something to your argument&#8211;e-book readers could learn something from how people use &#8220;p-books.&#8221;  In particular, I would like to see e-book readers with multi-touch interface, so that I can flip or flick pages across the screen.  Moreover, a screen without glare would be nice!</p>
<p>The closer the e-book reading experience becomes to that of p-books, the more people will make the switch.  However, until that comes along, I&#8217;ll continue to try and find free printing venues to print those e-books out onto paper.  It sure beats paying $100+ for a textbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Scheppke</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2006/09/15/rethinking-e-books-vs-p-books/comment-page-1/#comment-85702</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Scheppke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=5504#comment-85702</guid>
		<description>Quinn, the biggest advantage of the e-book over the p-book will (eventually) be price, and low priced e-books will kill p-books. Bill Gates got this right:

"The e-book will also revolutionise the economics of the industry. The cost of publishing books will fall dramatically, the result of savings on materials, labour, manufacturing and distribution. In the process, a lot of trees will also be saved and even the most obscure author will be able to self-publish, which means more choice for readers. The retail price of books will fall; sales will explode."

P-books are a luxury item.  Most people can't afford to pay $30 for a hardback book.  That's why public libraries are thriving.  But e-books don't require a retailer (about 40% of the cost of a p-book) and they don't need to be printed or shipped either.  They can be effectively marketed worldwide to an increasingly English-reading world.  Authors and publishers can make more money on high-volume, low cost e-books than they now make on low-volume, high cost p-books.  Of course it will take a while for this to happen, but it will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quinn, the biggest advantage of the e-book over the p-book will (eventually) be price, and low priced e-books will kill p-books. Bill Gates got this right:</p>
<p>&#8220;The e-book will also revolutionise the economics of the industry. The cost of publishing books will fall dramatically, the result of savings on materials, labour, manufacturing and distribution. In the process, a lot of trees will also be saved and even the most obscure author will be able to self-publish, which means more choice for readers. The retail price of books will fall; sales will explode.&#8221;</p>
<p>P-books are a luxury item.  Most people can&#8217;t afford to pay $30 for a hardback book.  That&#8217;s why public libraries are thriving.  But e-books don&#8217;t require a retailer (about 40% of the cost of a p-book) and they don&#8217;t need to be printed or shipped either.  They can be effectively marketed worldwide to an increasingly English-reading world.  Authors and publishers can make more money on high-volume, low cost e-books than they now make on low-volume, high cost p-books.  Of course it will take a while for this to happen, but it will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
