TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home

News & views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics
June 21st, 2007

H.L. Mencken as a blogger—or nonblogger: Take your pick (and enjoy the free e-book)

By David Rothman

Mencken book coverH.L. Mencken (1880-1956), for our reader overseas, was often regarded as America’s nearest equivalent to George Bernard Shaw—at least as a knocker of the establishment and pious hypocrites.

He was a newspaperman, literary critic, magazine editor, you name it, and in Mencken: The American Iconoclast, biographer Marion Elizabeth Rogers captures him brilliantly in clear and vivid prose. The well-chosen photos, whether of Mencken at his typewriter or of the Scopes Monkey Trial, just add to my enjoyment of the book.

You can download the Oxford University Press book for free from Wowio; just remember—use Mobipocket Desktop’s translator from Adobe, rather than viewing it immediately in PDF, or the Mobi converter won’t work. Mobi does a great job with this book, photos and all, and ideally in the future Wowio will be able to point readers to Mobi, Adobe Digital Editions (IDPF format mode), dotReader or another alternative to PDF, a better format for printing out books than reading them. If you must use PDF for displaying the Mencken book, then consider reading it in Digital Editions (just reviewed).

A blogger in spirit—and there’s even a slight e-book connection

So here’s the question of the day. Would Mencken, oft called The Sage of Baltimore, have made a good blogger, were he alive now? I say yes. He thrived on controversy, was a civil libertarian to the max, and was reported to the U.S. Justice Department for less-than-worshipful words about George Washington. Along the way, he even had a very, very indirect connection to what became the e-book scene many years later. David Moynihan named his Blackmask site (same one embroiled in copyright disputes) after a detective magazine that Mencken cofounded.

Well in touch with the great literary talents and trends of his time, Mencken helped discover F. Scott Fitzgerald, and even ran essays from hobos and bricklayers (among other contributors) in another magazine of his, The Smart Set. Although he lived a conservative life, he was the ultimate anti-credentialist and rabble-rouser, at least within the intelligentsia. Oh, how we could use him today to take on George Bush and the like on Iraq and evolution.

Mencken was even an Arab-American of the World War I years—given his German roots and the D.C.-driven prejudices that led to sauerkraut being called Liberty Cabbage. Simply put, he had reasons, good and bad, to be POed at the establishment, and in the true spirit of the blogosphere, he never backed off.

Not everyone would agree with me on Mencken and the blogger question. Marion Rodgers herself writes in the Oxford University Press blog:

“I question whether Mencken would have been a blogger. Yes, like Gore Vidal, he would have embraced the fierce and refreshing independence of bloggers. He would have congratulated those few that get a scoop ahead of the mainstream press, now in such decay. Mencken celebrated the independent, family newspapers, like his old paper, the Baltimore Sun; he would have felt bitter that so many are now owned by conglomerates. Nonetheless, Mencken always considered himself a newspaperman. Very few bloggers could be called journalists.”

As much as I admire her book, I’d disagree with her a little. Some blogs are no more than PR efforts or exercises in kneejerk activism, but a growing number of others strive to offer the same mix of usefulness and fairness that a good newspaper does (even if the operative word here is “fairness” rather than “objectivity”).

The best blogs can approach the best newspaper columns in quality—in fact, surpass them on occasion. Just look at Josh Marshall’s efforts on stories such as the CIA leak scandal, where he scooped the MSM. My hunch is that Mencken would have used blogging to promote his books and magazines and maybe even as an end in itself. Perhaps the Sun Papers, for which he worked in Baltimore, would have run a Mencken blog, with the Sage enjoying the outrage that he stirred up on the comments pages. Talk about near-instant gratification!

Journalism authority: He’d have admired bloggers

On my side about Mencken—or at least about a friendly attitude toward bloggers, whether or not he actually would have been one—is journalism authority Donald Ritchie. “Yes,” he replies to her in the Oxford Press blog, “as king of the print generation H.L. Mencken would surely have shuddered over the ephemeral nature of cyberspace, but I can’t help thinking that he would have admired the bloggers’ linguistic creativity and their penchant for poking holes in the establishment’s pretensions.”

Of course, if some librarians and hangers-on have their way, the better aspects of cyberspace won’t be so ephemeral. But back to Mencken. If, for your blogging, you’re looking for inspiration beyond the latest RSS feeds, then I’d urge you to download the Mencken biography or buy or borrow the p-book.

Housekeeping: The IDPF-standards post will be along shortly.

Digg us! Slashdot us! Share the news.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Netvouz
  • YahooMyWeb

7 Responses to “H.L. Mencken as a blogger—or nonblogger: Take your pick (and enjoy the free e-book)”

  1. great post. I look forward to looking over this book. (Btw, I speculated once about whether Kafka would have kept a weblog ).

    I haven’t read a ton of Mencken, but what I have read compares very well with bloggers of today. I honestly don’t know if newspapermen like Mencken or Walter Lippman were able to make a living comfortably in those days, but I’m guessing that Mencken would be weblogging too if he were around today. Mencken’s columns remain fresh (and iconoclastic) today. I have to wonder whether the current batch of NYT reporters will ever have the same staying power–I think Frank Rich’s caustic columns might stand a chance. But he is the exception rather than the rule. The formula for successful column writing in today’s market is to write for free with possibly advertising support, gain a following and having a MSM outlet pay you to join their team. Mencken would be amused, but there is a fairness about this method; at least nobody is being prevented from publishing these days. I for one would like to see more bloggers packaging their essays into ebook format (polishing them a little of course). Maybe that’s a business model: essays are for free on the net; an ebook collection of these essays is a $1 or so.

    One of my fave writers, Mike Royko, wrote in a more personal style and yet he managed to touch upon lots of social and political changes noticed by ordinary people. Writers like Buchwald, Rooney, Cooke (and more recently) Scott Adams will probably be read by future readers more than we would realize..for glimpses into how ordinary people lived and thought and laughed.

    Finally let me give a plug for the Houston Chronicle which jumped on the blog bandwagon earlier than most. In addition to putting most of their paid staff on blogs , they’ve provided free blog hosting to many freelancers in the Houston area . Of course, to keep these writers blogging, media outlets probably need to offer incentives…It’s unclear whether any future Menckens are soon to emerge from this pack.

  2. David Rothman wonders if Mencken would have made a good blogger and Robert Nagle poses a similar question about Franz Kafka. Mencken certainly was a robust controversialist and that is important to many blog readers. Wondering how historical figures would adapt to the internet age is engaging. In one case a gentleman who died hundreds of years ago has been refashioned into a contemporary-style blogger posthumously. Samuel Pepys inhabited London in the 1600s and he kept a remarkable diary that was published in the nineteenth century. Wikipedia says that the diary “provides a fascinating combination of personal revelation and eyewitness accounts of great events, such as the Great Plague of London, the Second Dutch War and the Great Fire of London.” Now the diary is available in blog format with the day of the year synchronized to current dates. Kafka’s diaries are available in blog format too.

  3. i smell a trend here.

  4. Can someone explain for me this… “just remember—use Mobipocket Desktop’s translator from Adobe, rather than viewing it immediately in PDF, or the Mobi converter won’t work” …from the Mencken post.

    I have been all over Mobipocket and Adobe sites and can find nothing about a “Mobi translator”. The Mobipocket Web Companion only converts HTML and text and as far as I can tell, the Reader does no converting. Or maybe I’m not understanding translating/converting.
    Thx, deanna

  5. Sure, Deanna. Look for Mobipocket’s Import feature and choose PDF. You need to work with Mobipocket Desktop (free on the site) rather than the old Companion. Get back to me if this isn’t detailed enough for you. Happy e-reading. David

  6. Garson, I wanted to point out something slightly ludicrous. I appreciate the similarities between weblogs and diaries. However, shouldn’t the people converting Pepys and Kafka into blog form be more oriented towards publishing as an ebook? Ebook is much easier and more portable (though without comment capability).

    If everything were magic, I’d like the ebook on my pda/reading device to update magically (and I’m not simply talking about scooping the latest chronological posts).

  7. David, thank you. I had installed the new M.P. Desktop a month or so ago and didn’t much like it (I guess when you get older you like familiar things), so I went back to to Pro v4.9 and kept the Companion for converting files for my Cybook.
    Awaiting your update on the DW375, as I am awaiting my DW375 ordered last weekend.
    I love TeleRead.
    deanna

Leave a Reply

This site is using OpenAvatar based on

Subscribe without commenting