<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright decision paves way for Mickey Mouse Act challenge?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/10/copyright-decision-provides-a-basis-for-challenging-mickey-mouse-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/10/copyright-decision-provides-a-basis-for-challenging-mickey-mouse-act/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Mark Ockerbloom</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/10/copyright-decision-provides-a-basis-for-challenging-mickey-mouse-act/comment-page-1/#comment-525204</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mark Ockerbloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7085#comment-525204</guid>
		<description>Of course, _Eldred_, the case cited by the 10th circuit, was the very case that upheld the "Mickey Mouse" extension in the first place.  I've never heard of a case where someone was able to get the Supreme Court to overturn a prior decision on the basis of that same decision.

Mind you, overturning the URAA in itself, one possible outcome of the 10th circuit decision if it's upheld, would in itself re-establish or clarify the public domain status of a lot of work.   Which I'd consider a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, _Eldred_, the case cited by the 10th circuit, was the very case that upheld the &#8220;Mickey Mouse&#8221; extension in the first place.  I&#8217;ve never heard of a case where someone was able to get the Supreme Court to overturn a prior decision on the basis of that same decision.</p>
<p>Mind you, overturning the URAA in itself, one possible outcome of the 10th circuit decision if it&#8217;s upheld, would in itself re-establish or clarify the public domain status of a lot of work.   Which I&#8217;d consider a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
