<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Shoot Yourself in the Foot&#8217; Department: Munseys owner on bizarre jihad against e-book standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/16/shoot-yourself-in-the-foot-department-munseys-owner-on-public-jihad-against-epub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/16/shoot-yourself-in-the-foot-department-munseys-owner-on-public-jihad-against-epub/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nairbv</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/16/shoot-yourself-in-the-foot-department-munseys-owner-on-public-jihad-against-epub/#comment-668743</link>
		<dc:creator>nairbv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 12:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7111#comment-668743</guid>
		<description>I thought it was cool that someone was working on a standardized ebook format.  When I realized Adobe was the driving force behind it, I was skeptical.  Then I read your article (without even reading the article you criticize) and it made me think less of epub.

After looking at the epub format (nothing more than zipped html with a mess of xml tacked on to it), I'm not impressed.

It seems to me like it could have been better optimized for ebook content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was cool that someone was working on a standardized ebook format.  When I realized Adobe was the driving force behind it, I was skeptical.  Then I read your article (without even reading the article you criticize) and it made me think less of epub.</p>
<p>After looking at the epub format (nothing more than zipped html with a mess of xml tacked on to it), I&#8217;m not impressed.</p>
<p>It seems to me like it could have been better optimized for ebook content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
