<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gutenberg CEO open to the IDPF e-book standard&#8212;while raising legit questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-596096</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-596096</guid>
		<description>Peter, here’s an invitation to contribute to the main part of the TeleRead blog to keep us up to date on DE-–write me at drNOSPAMteleread.org. We're reaching tens of thousands of people each month, so you’d get exposure to additional opinions. And the ideas here can result in a better product. I’m all in favor of a mix of both the commercial and open source models, which can be extremely synergistic.

In a somewhat related vein, I’m especially interested in the direction and progress of the DE version for the Sony Reader. Either directly or by leaning on Sony, you’d do well to offer heavier fonts, at least as an option, so the E Ink screen is easier to read in dim light. Your thoughts on this?

An aside: the newer Reader is a considerable improvement over the old one in the contrast area, but it’s still not the same as an LCD in that regard.

Thanks!
David

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, here’s an invitation to contribute to the main part of the TeleRead blog to keep us up to date on DE-–write me at drNOSPAMteleread.org. We&#8217;re reaching tens of thousands of people each month, so you’d get exposure to additional opinions. And the ideas here can result in a better product. I’m all in favor of a mix of both the commercial and open source models, which can be extremely synergistic.</p>
<p>In a somewhat related vein, I’m especially interested in the direction and progress of the DE version for the Sony Reader. Either directly or by leaning on Sony, you’d do well to offer heavier fonts, at least as an option, so the E Ink screen is easier to read in dim light. Your thoughts on this?</p>
<p>An aside: the newer Reader is a considerable improvement over the old one in the contrast area, but it’s still not the same as an LCD in that regard.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-594052</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-594052</guid>
		<description>I had seen the blog link you posted before, but I see no way to post a question, other than to comment on an existing blog entry. Am I missing something? A support forum would be better suited, rather than a blog.

I still would like to see Adobe post a document that lists exactly which parts of the OPS spec that DE supports currently and perhaps when we can expect the rest of the spec to be supported.

The article posted at the following address mentions a few things that DE does not support, but the article doesn't seem to be officially from Adobe. I assume the author either had some inside knowledge or used trial and error to determine what didn't work (as I am doing).
http://www.hxa7241.org/articles/content/epub-guide_hxa7241_2007.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had seen the blog link you posted before, but I see no way to post a question, other than to comment on an existing blog entry. Am I missing something? A support forum would be better suited, rather than a blog.</p>
<p>I still would like to see Adobe post a document that lists exactly which parts of the OPS spec that DE supports currently and perhaps when we can expect the rest of the spec to be supported.</p>
<p>The article posted at the following address mentions a few things that DE does not support, but the article doesn&#8217;t seem to be officially from Adobe. I assume the author either had some inside knowledge or used trial and error to determine what didn&#8217;t work (as I am doing).<br />
<a href="http://www.hxa7241.org/articles/content/epub-guide_hxa7241_2007.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hxa7241.org/articles/content/epub-guide_hxa7241_2007.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sorotokin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-593518</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sorotokin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-593518</guid>
		<description>Joseph,

Your suggestions/ctiticizms all make sense. In terms of drop caps, I'd need to see the code.

Digital Editions is slower than it could be, but 8 seconds is certainly way too slow. By chance, are you trying to format your book as a single gigantic XHTML file? If so, break it up into small chapters - that should help performace a lot.

In general, questions for Adobe are better go to http://blogs.adobe.com/digitaleditions/ - you are really lucky that I looked at this entry again.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph,</p>
<p>Your suggestions/ctiticizms all make sense. In terms of drop caps, I&#8217;d need to see the code.</p>
<p>Digital Editions is slower than it could be, but 8 seconds is certainly way too slow. By chance, are you trying to format your book as a single gigantic XHTML file? If so, break it up into small chapters - that should help performace a lot.</p>
<p>In general, questions for Adobe are better go to <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/digitaleditions/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.adobe.com/digitaleditions/</a> - you are really lucky that I looked at this entry again.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-589214</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-589214</guid>
		<description>This question is targetted at Peter Sorotokin.

Is there a document that spells out exactly what subset of the OPS spec that Digital Editions supports?. This would help quite a bit. I have been using trial and error to see what worked and what didn't.

I have had two problems so far. One is related to rendering and the other to the DE interface.

First, using CSS to create drop caps works, but the positioning of the initial letter and the succeding lines isn't correct. The drop caps display correctly in IE6, Firefox 2 and the Lector plugin.

Second, there needs to be a "Back" button or other means to return from a hyperlink jump. I want to hyperlink a word, which jumps to an entry in a glossary. This works, but then I have no way to return to where I was reading. Every method of implementing "Back" functionallity that I have tried returns me to the start of the document, which is not good. Hyperlinking every glossary word to reverse jump is not only needlessly cumbersome, but doesn't work if more than one word in the text is linked to the same glossary entry.

Not exactly related to the above, but to DE overall, is how slow it is. Opening an epub ebook, paging to a new chapter (when using separate files for each chapter) take a very noticeable time. When clicking on a hyperlink, it takes 8-10 seconds to actually jump to the target. Something is wrong here, when these things take so long on a modern P4 computer with 1GB of RAM. I have done these type of things on old, much slower PDAs, without noticeable delay.

One last interface suggestion: give us some way to change the program colors. That dark grey on black may look cool, but it isn't very easy to see.

None of this is intended as critisism, but is given as customer feedback, in the hope that DE will improve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question is targetted at Peter Sorotokin.</p>
<p>Is there a document that spells out exactly what subset of the OPS spec that Digital Editions supports?. This would help quite a bit. I have been using trial and error to see what worked and what didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I have had two problems so far. One is related to rendering and the other to the DE interface.</p>
<p>First, using CSS to create drop caps works, but the positioning of the initial letter and the succeding lines isn&#8217;t correct. The drop caps display correctly in IE6, Firefox 2 and the Lector plugin.</p>
<p>Second, there needs to be a &#8220;Back&#8221; button or other means to return from a hyperlink jump. I want to hyperlink a word, which jumps to an entry in a glossary. This works, but then I have no way to return to where I was reading. Every method of implementing &#8220;Back&#8221; functionallity that I have tried returns me to the start of the document, which is not good. Hyperlinking every glossary word to reverse jump is not only needlessly cumbersome, but doesn&#8217;t work if more than one word in the text is linked to the same glossary entry.</p>
<p>Not exactly related to the above, but to DE overall, is how slow it is. Opening an epub ebook, paging to a new chapter (when using separate files for each chapter) take a very noticeable time. When clicking on a hyperlink, it takes 8-10 seconds to actually jump to the target. Something is wrong here, when these things take so long on a modern P4 computer with 1GB of RAM. I have done these type of things on old, much slower PDAs, without noticeable delay.</p>
<p>One last interface suggestion: give us some way to change the program colors. That dark grey on black may look cool, but it isn&#8217;t very easy to see.</p>
<p>None of this is intended as critisism, but is given as customer feedback, in the hope that DE will improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sorotokin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-588863</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sorotokin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-588863</guid>
		<description>Adobe Digital Editions will happily work without .xpgt file and it will continue to work. The only downside of not using .xpgt is not being able to control the number of columns and the header location. Xpgt file is a proper extension of the epub format, it just contains additional styling information. It can always be safely ignored by viewers that don't understand it. If you don't need (or want) to use it, then by all means don't use it - no problem.

You can quote me to Greg on this.

Peter Sorotokin

Digital Editions lead engineer

Adobe Systems Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe Digital Editions will happily work without .xpgt file and it will continue to work. The only downside of not using .xpgt is not being able to control the number of columns and the header location. Xpgt file is a proper extension of the epub format, it just contains additional styling information. It can always be safely ignored by viewers that don&#8217;t understand it. If you don&#8217;t need (or want) to use it, then by all means don&#8217;t use it - no problem.</p>
<p>You can quote me to Greg on this.</p>
<p>Peter Sorotokin</p>
<p>Digital Editions lead engineer</p>
<p>Adobe Systems Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stewart mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-536372</link>
		<dc:creator>stewart mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-536372</guid>
		<description>Hi all,

I am writing an article on ebooks, and .epub, but one main concern is over whether the DRM could actually hold the format back from a consumer point of view.

Could, for example, the big software and publishing houses hijack this format and use it to increase revenues from ebooks?

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>I am writing an article on ebooks, and .epub, but one main concern is over whether the DRM could actually hold the format back from a consumer point of view.</p>
<p>Could, for example, the big software and publishing houses hijack this format and use it to increase revenues from ebooks?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-536089</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-536089</guid>
		<description>I agree with Jon. I have created dozens of epub ebooks which conform IDPF specs but somewhat different from Adobe's sample ebooks (e.g., I do not use  .xpgt file). All of my ebooks can be read by Adobe Digital Editions very well. See

http://www.web-books.com/Classics/Default.htm

Thanks, Jon, and other contributors to the IDPF "standards" (hopefully).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jon. I have created dozens of epub ebooks which conform IDPF specs but somewhat different from Adobe&#8217;s sample ebooks (e.g., I do not use  .xpgt file). All of my ebooks can be read by Adobe Digital Editions very well. See</p>
<p><a href="http://www.web-books.com/Classics/Default.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.web-books.com/Classics/Default.htm</a></p>
<p>Thanks, Jon, and other contributors to the IDPF &#8220;standards&#8221; (hopefully).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Noring</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-535272</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Noring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-535272</guid>
		<description>Yes, the EPUB standard is completely open. Anyone may build reading systems based on it with no license, and anyone may build publications to that spec with no license. It is akin to building web sites and web browsers.

Regarding Adobe's "extensions" in Digital Editions (DE), it is my understanding that any conforming EPUB will render in DE according to the requirements of the IDPF specs, and does not need to include any "extensions" to properly render.

Now, if DE does not properly render ordinary EPUB's (those without any Adobe extensions), then I'd like to know (and I do plan to experiment with this soon.) Tamas, do you have reason to believe this is the case? If so, what are the specific extensions required to make an EPUB look decent in DE?

Btw, most of the EPUB's that the major publishers will produce will be done by commercial conversion houses, and at least for the conversion houses I've talked with, they will not use InDesign to generate the EPUB Publications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the EPUB standard is completely open. Anyone may build reading systems based on it with no license, and anyone may build publications to that spec with no license. It is akin to building web sites and web browsers.</p>
<p>Regarding Adobe&#8217;s &#8220;extensions&#8221; in Digital Editions (DE), it is my understanding that any conforming EPUB will render in DE according to the requirements of the IDPF specs, and does not need to include any &#8220;extensions&#8221; to properly render.</p>
<p>Now, if DE does not properly render ordinary EPUB&#8217;s (those without any Adobe extensions), then I&#8217;d like to know (and I do plan to experiment with this soon.) Tamas, do you have reason to believe this is the case? If so, what are the specific extensions required to make an EPUB look decent in DE?</p>
<p>Btw, most of the EPUB&#8217;s that the major publishers will produce will be done by commercial conversion houses, and at least for the conversion houses I&#8217;ve talked with, they will not use InDesign to generate the EPUB Publications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamas Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-535207</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamas Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-535207</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"It’s important to understand that one does not need Adobe InDesign to create EPUB!"&lt;/i&gt;

I understand what you are saying but I disagree.
The de-facto implementation of the IDPF standard is Adobe's Digital Editions but to really get the useful capabilities of it you need to use Adobe's creation tool the reason being that they extended the specification in their implementation but did not document these extensions - at least not for the public.

IDPF/epub is all about preparing Adobe to survive in a post-paper world where the electronic representation of text on paper (PDF) will no longer be meaningful. Kudos for Adobe for realizing this and taking steps... but it's not really an "open standard" then, is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;It’s important to understand that one does not need Adobe InDesign to create EPUB!&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I understand what you are saying but I disagree.<br />
The de-facto implementation of the IDPF standard is Adobe&#8217;s Digital Editions but to really get the useful capabilities of it you need to use Adobe&#8217;s creation tool the reason being that they extended the specification in their implementation but did not document these extensions - at least not for the public.</p>
<p>IDPF/epub is all about preparing Adobe to survive in a post-paper world where the electronic representation of text on paper (PDF) will no longer be meaningful. Kudos for Adobe for realizing this and taking steps&#8230; but it&#8217;s not really an &#8220;open standard&#8221; then, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Noring</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-535059</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Noring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-535059</guid>
		<description>Robert, all OPS Reading Systems must support a minimum subset of XHTML 1.1, which includes the table module. Just think of OPS Reading Systems as similar to standards web browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, all OPS Reading Systems must support a minimum subset of XHTML 1.1, which includes the table module. Just think of OPS Reading Systems as similar to standards web browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadrien</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-534670</link>
		<dc:creator>Hadrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-534670</guid>
		<description>Feedbooks will have on the fly epub files this month. We'll enable this feature on books first and then on RSS feeds too.

In the future, we'll work on improving the overall look of these epub files and would also like to add a "custom epub" feature on the website, where anyone will be able to easily customize the CSS and layout of the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feedbooks will have on the fly epub files this month. We&#8217;ll enable this feature on books first and then on RSS feeds too.</p>
<p>In the future, we&#8217;ll work on improving the overall look of these epub files and would also like to add a &#8220;custom epub&#8221; feature on the website, where anyone will be able to easily customize the CSS and layout of the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-534380</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-534380</guid>
		<description>At heart, .epub is about accessibility (DTBOOK)  and css support.  Really, after you get things in a relatively structured format, all you need to worry about is which CSS features work for which device/software.  Perhaps if there were some way to check that your css conforms with OPS style guidelines, that would make things easier. If project gutenberg created 2 or 3 standard stylesheets and a script for creating the package/manifest and a script for zipping everything, you wouldn't really need an editor. 

Fortunately there are a lot of people adept at composing css. 

what I can't figure out is what table support means. OPS requires table support, but Sony Reader and Mobipocket offer little if any support for it. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At heart, .epub is about accessibility (DTBOOK)  and css support.  Really, after you get things in a relatively structured format, all you need to worry about is which CSS features work for which device/software.  Perhaps if there were some way to check that your css conforms with OPS style guidelines, that would make things easier. If project gutenberg created 2 or 3 standard stylesheets and a script for creating the package/manifest and a script for zipping everything, you wouldn&#8217;t really need an editor. </p>
<p>Fortunately there are a lot of people adept at composing css. </p>
<p>what I can&#8217;t figure out is what table support means. OPS requires table support, but Sony Reader and Mobipocket offer little if any support for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-534054</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-534054</guid>
		<description>Me, too, Jon. Even better, why not lay out your own suggestions for IDPF and PG. I'm really convinced that the IDPF should encourage open source implementations and public domain uses, not just tolerate them. Otherwise the IDPF may just be perceived as a tool of Adobe. Thanks. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me, too, Jon. Even better, why not lay out your own suggestions for IDPF and PG. I&#8217;m really convinced that the IDPF should encourage open source implementations and public domain uses, not just tolerate them. Otherwise the IDPF may just be perceived as a tool of Adobe. Thanks. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-533977</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-533977</guid>
		<description>"My Lordy, I really do need to write the “EPUB Demystified” article that’s been burning in my mind for the last few weeks."

-----

Jon, we're all waiting :-)  Your article would be very helpful, although I would prefer someone wrote a simple tool to handle much of the manual formatting for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My Lordy, I really do need to write the “EPUB Demystified” article that’s been burning in my mind for the last few weeks.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Jon, we&#8217;re all waiting <img src='http://www.teleread.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Your article would be very helpful, although I would prefer someone wrote a simple tool to handle much of the manual formatting for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Noring</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2007/09/17/gutenberg-ceo-open-to-the-idfp-e-book-standard-while-raising-legit-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-533701</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Noring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7117#comment-533701</guid>
		<description>It&#8217;s important to understand that one does not need Adobe InDesign to create EPUB!

EPUB is simply a zip file that contains an OPS Publication. In turn, an OPS Publication is simply a file set containing one or more XHTML 1.1 documents (representing the ebook content), an XML file called the &#8220;Package&#8221; (which contains metadata, a table of contents, and other optional stuff), along with optional CSS style sheets and PNG/JPG images.

An OPS Publication is not that much different from a standards-conforming web site, for gosh sakes!

I use a plain text editor to produce OPS Publications. Others may wish to use some tool to create the XHTML 1.1 document(s) and the Package.

On the other side of the coin, if Opera and/or Firefox so choose, they could quite quickly add a module to their browsers to render EPUB Publications. I&#8217;ve actually approached H&#229;kon Lie at Opera about this possibility.

My Lordy, I really do need to write the &#8220;EPUB Demystified&#8221; article that&#8217;s been burning in my mind for the last few weeks. All the misconceptions floating around about EPUB, especially David Moynihan&#8217;s article, which definitely need to be cleared up.

Btw, for those who wonder who I am, I&#8217;m one of the principal technical contributors to the three IDPF standards which underly EPUB, so I do know a little bit about the EPUB open standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&rsquo;s important to understand that one does not need Adobe InDesign to create EPUB!</p>
<p>EPUB is simply a zip file that contains an OPS Publication. In turn, an OPS Publication is simply a file set containing one or more XHTML 1.1 documents (representing the ebook content), an XML file called the &ldquo;Package&rdquo; (which contains metadata, a table of contents, and other optional stuff), along with optional CSS style sheets and PNG/JPG images.</p>
<p>An OPS Publication is not that much different from a standards-conforming web site, for gosh sakes!</p>
<p>I use a plain text editor to produce OPS Publications. Others may wish to use some tool to create the XHTML 1.1 document(s) and the Package.</p>
<p>On the other side of the coin, if Opera and/or Firefox so choose, they could quite quickly add a module to their browsers to render EPUB Publications. I&rsquo;ve actually approached H&aring;kon Lie at Opera about this possibility.</p>
<p>My Lordy, I really do need to write the &ldquo;EPUB Demystified&rdquo; article that&rsquo;s been burning in my mind for the last few weeks. All the misconceptions floating around about EPUB, especially David Moynihan&rsquo;s article, which definitely need to be cleared up.</p>
<p>Btw, for those who wonder who I am, I&rsquo;m one of the principal technical contributors to the three IDPF standards which underly EPUB, so I do know a little bit about the EPUB open standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
