<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anne Gentle: Are wikis good for creating manuals and e-books?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill from Atlassian</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/comment-page-1/#comment-997656</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill from Atlassian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/#comment-997656</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the pragmatic tips. It seems like 90% of the effort in using a wiki for tech writing lies in finding the right set of features that support your process and formats. BTW, we're having a &lt;a href='http://tr.im/2rhe' rel="nofollow"&gt;webinar&lt;/a&gt; on Jan 15 showing how OpenCloud uses wikis for technical documentation if anyone is interested in attending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the pragmatic tips. It seems like 90% of the effort in using a wiki for tech writing lies in finding the right set of features that support your process and formats. BTW, we&#8217;re having a <a href='http://tr.im/2rhe' rel="nofollow">webinar</a> on Jan 15 showing how OpenCloud uses wikis for technical documentation if anyone is interested in attending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notional Slurry &#187; links for 2008-01-10</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/comment-page-1/#comment-686592</link>
		<dc:creator>Notional Slurry &#187; links for 2008-01-10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/#comment-686592</guid>
		<description>[...] Anne Gentle: Are wikis good for creating manuals and ebooks? &#124; TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home (tags: collaboration documentation wiki publishing print books) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anne Gentle: Are wikis good for creating manuals and ebooks? | TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home (tags: collaboration documentation wiki publishing print books) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/comment-page-1/#comment-682267</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/#comment-682267</guid>
		<description>Very good write up and reflects some of the experience we have with FLOSS Manuals very closely. 

On the issue of % of contributors. We are trialling a 'book sprint' model for bringing people together in real space for intensive working periods. It will be interesting to see if this increases the ongoing online collaboration between writers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good write up and reflects some of the experience we have with FLOSS Manuals very closely. </p>
<p>On the issue of % of contributors. We are trialling a &#8216;book sprint&#8217; model for bringing people together in real space for intensive working periods. It will be interesting to see if this increases the ongoing online collaboration between writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Cane</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/comment-page-1/#comment-681893</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/#comment-681893</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... maybe a link of interest?

http://my-ecoach.com/online/webresourcelist.php?rlid=4992</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; maybe a link of interest?</p>
<p><a href="http://my-ecoach.com/online/webresourcelist.php?rlid=4992" rel="nofollow">http://my-ecoach.com/online/webresourcelist.php?rlid=4992</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Gentle</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/comment-page-1/#comment-681887</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Gentle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/03/anne-gentle-are-wikis-good-for-creating-manuals-and-ebooks/#comment-681887</guid>
		<description>Great write-up Robert. I especially appreciate the compare/contrast for experts vs non-experts authoring a wiki - approaching knowledge with a fresh perspective is an excellent way to populate the beginning content, and the collaborative nature of a wiki lends itself well to the first-draft-then-revise writing method. The newbie scenario held true for my contributions to the OLPC wiki - I knew next to nothing going in, and that newbie perspective was valuable. 

Just wanted to say thanks for offering more food for thought! It's such a fascinating subject, wikis for documentation. Stewart Mader (of wikipatterns) and I are hoping to present at DocTrain in Vancouver in May 2008. We're offering perspectives on how well wikis can (or should) be structured and which content is then your "source" - the wiki or the structured document (like DITA XML?) You'd enjoy it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write-up Robert. I especially appreciate the compare/contrast for experts vs non-experts authoring a wiki - approaching knowledge with a fresh perspective is an excellent way to populate the beginning content, and the collaborative nature of a wiki lends itself well to the first-draft-then-revise writing method. The newbie scenario held true for my contributions to the OLPC wiki - I knew next to nothing going in, and that newbie perspective was valuable. </p>
<p>Just wanted to say thanks for offering more food for thought! It&#8217;s such a fascinating subject, wikis for documentation. Stewart Mader (of wikipatterns) and I are hoping to present at DocTrain in Vancouver in May 2008. We&#8217;re offering perspectives on how well wikis can (or should) be structured and which content is then your &#8220;source&#8221; - the wiki or the structured document (like DITA XML?) You&#8217;d enjoy it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
