<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Kindle as censorship fodder: E more vulnerable to Big Bro than P?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SpiderMatt</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-692683</link>
		<dc:creator>SpiderMatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-692683</guid>
		<description>The Kindle has spyware?  Where did you read this?  Now I'm curious as to how that works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kindle has spyware?  Where did you read this?  Now I&#8217;m curious as to how that works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-691046</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-691046</guid>
		<description>Probably not very likely, but yet another reason to abolish the FCC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably not very likely, but yet another reason to abolish the FCC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-691030</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-691030</guid>
		<description>Alas, Robert, D.C. might not just stop at wireless. Quite objectively, America is becoming more KGBish, as shown by increased surveillance going far beyond the understandable need to fight terrorism. Let's hope the country will change directions soon. As important as I believe is the issue of copyright, the First Amendment as a whole counts even more. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, Robert, D.C. might not just stop at wireless. Quite objectively, America is becoming more KGBish, as shown by increased surveillance going far beyond the understandable need to fight terrorism. Let&#8217;s hope the country will change directions soon. As important as I believe is the issue of copyright, the First Amendment as a whole counts even more. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-690990</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/01/16/the-kindle-as-censorship-fodder-e-more-vulnerable-to-big-bro-than-p/#comment-690990</guid>
		<description>The real issue as I see it is not censorship of content (although that probably is a concern) but state regulatory power  over methods to share infringing content.  Kindle is probably a special case because the seller/manufacturer is providing wireless access as part of the product. In this case, it concerns not merely state regulation but the ability of a product seller to limit the use of its network. (Presumably if consumers had the ability to download pirated content unencumbered, they would buy fewer Amazon ebooks). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real issue as I see it is not censorship of content (although that probably is a concern) but state regulatory power  over methods to share infringing content.  Kindle is probably a special case because the seller/manufacturer is providing wireless access as part of the product. In this case, it concerns not merely state regulation but the ability of a product seller to limit the use of its network. (Presumably if consumers had the ability to download pirated content unencumbered, they would buy fewer Amazon ebooks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
