TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home

News & views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics
March 5th, 2008

Cellphones vs. dedicated e-readers: Why Cory’s PARTLY right

By David Rothman

doctorow_150x224 The Kindle and the Sony Reader are the rage among many publishing pros—no longer is the focus as much on PDAs and cellphones. You already know about PW editor Sara Nelson’s famously mourned Kindle.

But long term, could the pros be making a mistake, a big one, when cell phones number more than a billion and dedicated e-readers are only in the tens of thousands?

I’ve argued that in the past, while noting that displays on cell phones will get much better. Now along comes Cory Doctorow with a Lotus column headlined: Put not your faith in ebook readers. Jeez, Cory sounds almost biblical, causing me to wonder whether his stubble should be a full beard. Here’s my reading on the Doctorow column.

Where Cory’s right

Yes, people favor multifunction devices, especially those they can carry in their pockets. Not everyone wants to mess with both a Kindle and a cell phone. The real future will be in phones with roll-out E Ink screens or other improved displays that can do justice to e-books. E Ink in the next few years will offer color and higher speeds, not to mention lower costs. Meanwhile, given the choice between no books and those displayed on small screens, many consumers will prefer cell phones if the books are there and are marketed well. Not all phones, granted, can work right now with e-books. But that will change.

I also agree with Cory that book reading isn’t as popular, at least here in the States, as it used to be—but what about the potential market in developing countries?

Furthermore, Cory correctly acknowledges that books will remain a large niche item, and his big point is that the multiuse approach will count more than single-use, Kindle-style gizmos. While you can use the Kindle for Web browsing, books are the machine’s real raison d’etre.

With multiuse, however, the economics of manufacturing become far more attractive than for single-use devices. There are issues such as whether people can focus on e-books when the other uses beckon, but as cell phone screens become more paperlike, books should be more enticing.

No, I’m not saying dedicated Kindle-style readers will die off, and in fact, in the Boing Boing blog, Cory softens his big premise with the headline Why hardware ebook readers are a dead end (for now anyway). Yes: for now. But the big action long term will be in cellphones.

Where the stubbled Prophet is wrong

Cory says the capacity of Chinese factories to make high-quality items is limited and could be a bottleneck for e-book gizmos. That could be a mistake in two respects.

First, the real bottleneck for now seems to be in E Ink displays made by PVI, but this will change as production ramps up—and keep in mind, too. some E Ink alternativea as Nemoptic-based technology.

Second, don’t underestimate the Chinese. I can remember dining in 1985 with a U.S. State Department expert on the economics of high tech in Asia. He assured me that China lacked the capability to churn out high-quality computer products. Well, I don’t have to tell you the rest of the story.

So, yes, I think that Chinese factories will be able to make e-book hardware a lot more cheaply than they can today. The Chinese are no longer just depending on low-cost labor: they’re automating. In the long run, then, any manufacturing bottlenecks in China are temporary, and e-reader prices should drop dramatically. Cory should have dwelt more on such inevitabilities. Even short term, why would Amazon be so energetically pushing the Kindle if it didn’t think that new shipments would soon be on the way? Maybe they won’t be. But my hunch is that the situation might dramatically change in the next few months.

Cory and the DRM angle

In evaluating Cory’s reading, keep in mind his abhorrence of the DRM of the kind found in the Kindle and Sony Reader, and in fact, I myself see DRM as a literary and commercial toxin for e-books.

That said, could the association of DRM with the Kindle and Sony Reader be one reason why Cory isn’t so gung-ho on such devices? Could this factor influence his assessments of their potential? Of course, DRM in itself detracts from the value of books purchased for such readers. You’re at the mercy of Amazon or Sony or other vendor—what if they give up on e-books, perhaps after losing out to vendors with more advanced technology to allow books to be read on cellphones? No guarantees. What’s more, you can’t read DRMed books for the Kindle and Sony on, say, cellphones and PDAs. But again, let’s be objective about Amazon and Sony.

Where America’s gone wrong

Here’s an aside. By now, there could have been a large market for American-made e-book hardware. One of the goals of the original TeleRead plan was to use schools and libraries to help seed the market for low-cost, multifunction machines for e-books and other purposes. Years later, One Laptop Per Child exists. Now guess where the OLPC machines are being made. Yes—of course: Asia. This far into the game, I wouldn’t expect anything else. If you’re in the e-book business, you probably haven’t much choice other than to turn to the mainland or Taiwan, and thanks to automation, as noted, their manufacturing capabilities are only going to get better.

For a different perspective: Alex’s MobileRead commentary on Cory’s premise.

Digg us! Slashdot us! Share the news. These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Netvouz
  • YahooMyWeb

8 Responses to “Cellphones vs. dedicated e-readers: Why Cory’s PARTLY right”

  1. Let’s keep timescale in mind here. Ten or twenty years from now, we’ll all have video input displayed directly onto our optical nerves, rendering the whole cellphone vs. dedicated reader issue moot. So, the question is, how do we get there and whether there’s enough of a market for dedicated readers now to repay the investment.

    I think that, today, a dedicated reader is superior to any of the multifunction devices I’m familiar with. I think this will still be the case at the end of 2008 but I’m not sure about 2009 but it seems possible that dedicated eReaders will be the better reading experience until 2010. Three years is normally a long enough time to repay investments in the high-tech world.

    Like you, I’ve been hearing about the roll-out ePaper display being almost here for years. I know it’ll get here eventually and hope it will be cool and useful. I’d like to see final pricing, refresh rates, screen quality and durability before I’m convinced this is the ultimate solution.

    Besides the multi-function aspect, the great advantage of the PDA/cellphone is that it’s highly portable. Even though I love my eBookWise, I still use my Palm for a lot of reading because I carry it in my pocket and it’s there–when I’m waiting for an appointment, having my oil changed, or when I’m alone at lunch in a restaurant. Ultimately I’d like to see one device, but then, I am looking forward to the direct optical nerve thing.

    Rob Preece
    Publisher, http://www.BooksForABuck.com

  2. Great thoughts, Rob, but even with an OLPC machine and a Sony Reader, I find myself reading on PDAs, too, when I’m in the mood. As for roll-out paper, it’s almost here in the form of the Readius. It’s both a cell phone and e-reader and will be sold later this year. Last I knew, the phone was really for Europeans more than Americans, and of course the resolution and the rest are not what they should be, but it’s still a nice preview of the future. Thanks. David

  3. I sort of agree, actually. I am in the market for a new ipod, and I actually did buy a classic only to return it because, with my other gizmos on board, it was just TOO MUCH to carry. A few times, I have wished that my ebookwise had just a little bit extra on it, or that I could get a phone which syncched to iTunes for less than the enormously expensive iPhone. And now that I have the ebookwise, I have been leaving the Dana at home more and more. I do think that eventually, an OLPC might be my perfect carry-along gizmo, but for right now, it’s the phone, ipod and ebookwise along with either the Dana or the Macbook when the need arises. I do have a hack to get my phone numbers on the ebookwise, but I still have my calendar in the Dana…

  4. As an unabashed Kindle lover, I think Cory’s right. I think this is key:

    “Frankly, book reading just isn’t important enough to qualify for priority treatment in that marketplace.”

    A standalone ebook reader is great for me. But then I read 4 books last week. That apparently puts me in a small subset of heavy readers. This group is clearly not large enough to drive a large dedicated ebook market (as opposed to the niche that the Sony Reader and Kindle seem to occupy).

    If there was a color Kindle that could refresh fast enough to support videogames, however…I would so play WoW on that thing.

  5. Here’s what I wrote for our internal blog:

    Cory Doctorow explains why e-readers are slow, clunky, but still in short supply: manufacturers aren’t interested in reading, either. They’d rather build “socket wrenches, Happy Meal toys, laptop computers, prison cafeteria trays, decorative tin planters, vinyl action figures, keychain flashlights and cheap handguns.” Or phones. Favorite quote:

    E-Ink is a brilliant solution in search of an economically compelling problem. $400 e-book readers are not that problem.

  6. Interesting info about reading on a cellphone - according to the Economist, in Japan sales of mobile-phone novels—books that you download and read, usually in instalments, on the screen of your cell phone—have jumped from nothing five years ago to over ¥10 billion ($82m) a year today (The Economist)

    Those figures are high enough to make you sit up and take notice.

  7. Garson O'Toole Says:
    March 7th, 2008 at 12:06 am

    Websites in the category “How It Works” are popular on the internet. Many people are curious about the techniques behind technology, but it is easy to provide flawed explanations. I think Doctorow’s short description of E-Ink is flawed. He says:

    E-Ink works on the basis of a close-knit grid of little two-tone balls that are physically rotated from white-side to black-side when a charge is applied to them.

    The explanation given at the E-Ink website differs from this. Here is a link to a picture at the E-Ink website that describes how E-Ink works. E-Ink uses two different types of chips – “positively charged white pigment chips” and “negatively charged black pigment chips”. It does not use two-tone balls that rotate. There was a technology called Gyricon developed at Xerox that used “bichromal beads” of the type Doctorow describes. But Gyricon differs from E-Ink and Gyricon development seems to be in limbo.

  8. Cory suggests that the real reason there are so few Kindles is that Amazon couldn’t outbid the people who contract the manufacture Happy Meal toys. But, typical of Cory, he provides zero evidence in support of his theory. Zilch. Nit. Nada.

    Somehow I think Amazon could have outbid the people who contracted for things like this and this.

    (I hope the above URLs work properly. The previewer is mangling them badly and I can’t figure out why! So if they don’t work, just envision any wacky Chinese-made plastic-and-electronic device you want - and you know there are many!)

    So I’m not really buying his theory about there not being enough manufacturers. The more likely bottlenecks are (1) e-ink screen availability (we once saw the same sort of bottleneck with LCD screens, you know), and (2) fact that e-readers still haven’t reached tipping point yet (MP3 players and cellphones didn’t immediately must-have devices either). Or maybe Amazon simply underestimated demand, and it’s taking time to tool up a larger production line.

    How many Cory prognostications have come true? I just don’t see him as the Prophet of All Things E - in fact I think he’s wrong more often than he’s right.

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting