<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social DRM used by Wiley&#8217;s WROX imprint for chapters on demand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/17/nice-going-joe-social-drm-used-by-wileys-wrox-imprint-for-chapters-on-demand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/17/nice-going-joe-social-drm-used-by-wileys-wrox-imprint-for-chapters-on-demand/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/17/nice-going-joe-social-drm-used-by-wileys-wrox-imprint-for-chapters-on-demand/#comment-802852</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/17/nice-going-joe-social-drm-used-by-wileys-wrox-imprint-for-chapters-on-demand/#comment-802852</guid>
		<description>Thought: Social DRM might be a good solution for larger publishers with the infrastructure to implement it---while smaller publishers simply avoided DRM. But would implementation be that difficult? Bill McCoy picked up the idea from &lt;a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/billmccoy/2007/02/steve_jobs_elim.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Pragmatic Programmer&lt;/a&gt;---hardly a giant conglomerate. Perhaps third parties could handle administration; costs would still be &lt;em&gt;much&lt;/em&gt; lower than for traditional DRM. Meanwhile thanks to Rob for sharing his perspective. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought: Social DRM might be a good solution for larger publishers with the infrastructure to implement it&#8212;while smaller publishers simply avoided DRM. But would implementation be that difficult? Bill McCoy picked up the idea from <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/billmccoy/2007/02/steve_jobs_elim.html" rel="nofollow">The Pragmatic Programmer</a>&#8212;hardly a giant conglomerate. Perhaps third parties could handle administration; costs would still be <em>much</em> lower than for traditional DRM. Meanwhile thanks to Rob for sharing his perspective. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/17/nice-going-joe-social-drm-used-by-wileys-wrox-imprint-for-chapters-on-demand/#comment-802819</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/05/17/nice-going-joe-social-drm-used-by-wileys-wrox-imprint-for-chapters-on-demand/#comment-802819</guid>
		<description>I'll be interested to hear how this works--and whether customers find the dropping of traditional DRM to be helpful. As many of you know, I don't use DRM on BooksForABuck.com books, but because I offer books in multiple formats (a customer can download any or all of them, depending on their device requirements), I've seen social DRM as a administrative non-starter.

Rob Preece
Publisher, www.BooksForABuck.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to hear how this works&#8211;and whether customers find the dropping of traditional DRM to be helpful. As many of you know, I don&#8217;t use DRM on BooksForABuck.com books, but because I offer books in multiple formats (a customer can download any or all of them, depending on their device requirements), I&#8217;ve seen social DRM as a administrative non-starter.</p>
<p>Rob Preece<br />
Publisher, <a href="http://www.BooksForABuck.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.BooksForABuck.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
