<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google ads: Pardon our dust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/07/google-ads-pardon-our-dust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/07/google-ads-pardon-our-dust/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/07/google-ads-pardon-our-dust/#comment-844025</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/07/google-ads-pardon-our-dust/#comment-844025</guid>
		<description>Be happy, Kevin---you helped folks out beyond me. The TeleBlog is a veritable time sink, albeit a worthy one, and I'm trying hard for the right balance between insolvency and obnoxious ads. 

So far the ads aren't showing up in the feeds, although this could take time. We might be missing half or more of my readers by not having the ads in feeds, so this is no minor issue, and I thank you for reminding us of it. 

As for relevance, you bet I care about that!

The best ads will lead to useful information. As I get to know Google better, I'll do what I can to help out in that regard, and meanwhile I'll welcome suggestions and other feedback.

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be happy, Kevin&#8212;you helped folks out beyond me. The TeleBlog is a veritable time sink, albeit a worthy one, and I&#8217;m trying hard for the right balance between insolvency and obnoxious ads. </p>
<p>So far the ads aren&#8217;t showing up in the feeds, although this could take time. We might be missing half or more of my readers by not having the ads in feeds, so this is no minor issue, and I thank you for reminding us of it. </p>
<p>As for relevance, you bet I care about that!</p>
<p>The best ads will lead to useful information. As I get to know Google better, I&#8217;ll do what I can to help out in that regard, and meanwhile I&#8217;ll welcome suggestions and other feedback.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/07/google-ads-pardon-our-dust/#comment-843904</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/07/google-ads-pardon-our-dust/#comment-843904</guid>
		<description>DOH - I guess I released the monster!  Ah well...I can read around the ads (and maybe I'll even click one or two from time to time for ya if they are relevant enough).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOH - I guess I released the monster!  Ah well&#8230;I can read around the ads (and maybe I&#8217;ll even click one or two from time to time for ya if they are relevant enough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
