<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Typing test: iPhone vs. Treo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/23/typing-test-iphone-vs-treo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/23/typing-test-iphone-vs-treo/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/23/typing-test-iphone-vs-treo/#comment-857653</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/23/typing-test-iphone-vs-treo/#comment-857653</guid>
		<description>As several commentors on the linked piece note, the methodology used stinks.

There have been studies done and the studies show that text entry on the iPhone is slower and less accurate than text entry on a thumb keyboard.  I'd love to see a _valid_ study that said something different, but this isn't it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As several commentors on the linked piece note, the methodology used stinks.</p>
<p>There have been studies done and the studies show that text entry on the iPhone is slower and less accurate than text entry on a thumb keyboard.  I&#8217;d love to see a _valid_ study that said something different, but this isn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
